Suppr超能文献

远程医疗在风湿病学中的应用:一项混合方法研究,旨在探索患者和临床医生对其接受度、偏好和体验。

Telemedicine in rheumatology: a mixed methods study exploring acceptability, preferences and experiences among patients and clinicians.

机构信息

Department of Public Health and Primary Care, School of Clinical Medicine, University of Cambridge, Cambridge.

Rheumatology Department, Northwick Park Hospital, Harrow.

出版信息

Rheumatology (Oxford). 2022 May 30;61(6):2262-2274. doi: 10.1093/rheumatology/keab796.

Abstract

OBJECTIVES

The Covid-19 pandemic necessitated a rapid global transition towards telemedicine; yet much remains unknown about telemedicine's acceptability and safety in rheumatology. To help address this gap and inform practice, this study investigated rheumatology patient and clinician experiences and views of telemedicine.

METHODS

Sequential mixed methodology combined analysis of surveys and in-depth interviews. Between and within-group differences in views of telemedicine were examined for patients and clinicians using t-tests.

RESULTS

Surveys (patients n = 1340, clinicians n = 111) and interviews (patients n = 31, clinicians n = 29) were completed between April 2021 and July 2021. The majority of patients were from the UK (96%) and had inflammatory arthritis (32%) or lupus (32%). Patients and clinicians rated telemedicine as worse than face-to-face consultations in almost all categories, although >60% found it more convenient. Building trusting medical relationships and assessment accuracy were great concerns (93% of clinicians and 86% of patients rated telemedicine as worse than face-to-face for assessment accuracy). Telemedicine was perceived to have increased misdiagnoses, inequalities and barriers to accessing care. Participants reported highly disparate telemedicine delivery and responsiveness from primary and secondary care. Although rheumatology clinicians highlighted the importance of a quick response to flaring patients, only 55% of patients were confident that their rheumatology department would respond within 48 hours.

CONCLUSION

Findings indicate a preference for face-to-face consultations. Some negative experiences may be due to the pandemic rather than telemedicine specifically, although the risk of greater diagnostic inaccuracies using telemedicine is unlikely to be fully resolved. Training, choice, careful patient selection, and further consultation with clinicians and patients is required to increase telemedicine's acceptability and safety.

TRIAL REGISTRATION

This telemedicine study is part of a pre-registered longitudinal multi-stage trial, the LISTEN study (ISRCTN-14966097), with later Covid-related additions registered in March 2021, including a pre-registered statistical analysis plan.

摘要

目的

Covid-19 大流行促使全球迅速向远程医疗转变;然而,远程医疗在风湿病学中的可接受性和安全性仍有许多未知之处。为了帮助填补这一空白并为实践提供信息,本研究调查了风湿病患者和临床医生对远程医疗的经验和看法。

方法

采用顺序混合方法对调查和深入访谈进行综合分析。使用 t 检验比较患者和临床医生对远程医疗的看法的组间和组内差异。

结果

2021 年 4 月至 7 月期间完成了调查(患者 n=1340,临床医生 n=111)和访谈(患者 n=31,临床医生 n=29)。大多数患者来自英国(96%),患有炎症性关节炎(32%)或狼疮(32%)。患者和临床医生在几乎所有类别中都将远程医疗评为不如面对面咨询,尽管超过 60%的人认为它更方便。建立信任的医疗关系和评估准确性是主要关注点(93%的临床医生和 86%的患者认为远程医疗在评估准确性方面不如面对面咨询)。远程医疗被认为会增加误诊、不平等和获得医疗服务的障碍。参与者报告说,初级保健和二级保健的远程医疗提供和响应差异很大。尽管风湿病临床医生强调了对病情加重患者快速做出反应的重要性,但只有 55%的患者有信心他们的风湿病科将在 48 小时内做出回应。

结论

研究结果表明患者更倾向于选择面对面咨询。一些负面体验可能是由于大流行而不是远程医疗本身引起的,尽管使用远程医疗可能会导致诊断准确性降低,但不太可能完全解决这一问题。需要培训、选择、仔细选择患者,并与临床医生和患者进一步协商,以提高远程医疗的可接受性和安全性。

试验注册

本项远程医疗研究是一项预先注册的纵向多阶段试验 LISTEN 研究(ISRCTN-14966097)的一部分,其中包括 2021 年 3 月注册的与新冠病毒相关的后续内容,包括预先注册的统计分析计划。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/7cb8/9157099/8250c860a444/keab796f1.jpg

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验