Clinical Haematology, St Vincent's Hospital Melbourne, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia.
Cellular Therapy Laboratory, St Vincent's Hospital Melbourne, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia.
Intern Med J. 2024 Jan;54(1):108-114. doi: 10.1111/imj.16170. Epub 2023 Jul 23.
Bortezomib, lenalidomide and dexamethasone (VRd) is now the standard-of-care induction therapy for newly diagnosed transplant-eligible multiple myeloma patients, replacing bortezomib, cyclophosphamide and dexamethasone (VCD) therapy. Lenalidomide can negatively impact stem cell yield because of its myelosuppressive effects, although studies have shown that the latter can be overcome with the use of cyclophosphamide for peripheral blood stem cell (PBSC) mobilisation.
To investigate whether lenalidomide impacts on PBSC mobilisation and to evaluate the optimal mobilisation strategy post VRd induction, we performed a retrospective review of 56 myeloma patients at a single centre who had PBSC mobilisation between January 2019 and March 2021 and compared three cohorts: (i) VCD induction; mobilisation with granulocyte colony-stimulating factor (G-CSF) alone (n = 23); (ii) four cycles VRd induction; mobilisation with G-CSF and cyclophosphamide (G-CSF + Cyclo) (n = 20); and (iii) three cycles VRd induction; mobilisation with G-CSF alone (n = 13).
There was no difference in the mean total CD34 count between VCD and VRd patients who had G-CSF mobilisation (6.27 × 10 /kg vs 5.50 × 10 /kg, P > 0.99). VRd patients mobilised with G-CSF + Cyclo achieved higher mean total CD34 counts compared with G-CSF alone (8.89 × 10 /kg vs 5.50 × 10 /kg, P = 0.04). The majority of VRd patients who had G-CSF + Cyclo (19 of 20; 95%) collected sufficient cells for two or more autologous stem cell transplants (ASCTs), regardless of whether this was required, compared with eight of 13 (62%) VRd patients who had G-CSF alone.
We conclude that successful PBSC mobilisation for at least one ASCT is possible after three cycles of VRd induction using G-CSF alone. The upfront use of a cyclophosphamide-based mobilisation strategy has a role in patients who have had VRd induction, where the aim is to collect enough stem cells for two or more ASCTs.
硼替佐米、来那度胺和地塞米松(VRd)现已成为适合移植的多发性骨髓瘤新诊断患者的标准诱导治疗药物,取代了硼替佐米、环磷酰胺和地塞米松(VCD)治疗。来那度胺会产生骨髓抑制作用,从而对干细胞产量产生负面影响,尽管研究表明,通过使用环磷酰胺进行外周血造血干细胞(PBSC)动员,可以克服这种负面影响。
为了研究来那度胺是否会影响 PBSC 动员,并评估 VRd 诱导后的最佳动员策略,我们对单中心 2019 年 1 月至 2021 年 3 月期间进行 PBSC 动员的 56 例骨髓瘤患者进行了回顾性研究,并将患者分为三组进行比较:(i)VCD 诱导;单独使用粒细胞集落刺激因子(G-CSF)动员(n=23);(ii)4 个周期 VRd 诱导;使用 G-CSF 和环磷酰胺(G-CSF+Cyclo)动员(n=20);以及(iii)3 个周期 VRd 诱导;单独使用 G-CSF 动员(n=13)。
接受 G-CSF 动员的 VCD 和 VRd 患者的平均总 CD34 计数没有差异(6.27×10 6 /kg 与 5.50×10 6 /kg,P>0.99)。与单独使用 G-CSF 相比,接受 G-CSF+Cyclo 动员的 VRd 患者的平均总 CD34 计数更高(8.89×10 6 /kg 与 5.50×10 6 /kg,P=0.04)。大多数接受 G-CSF+Cyclo 动员的 VRd 患者(20 例中的 19 例,95%)收集了足够的细胞进行两次或更多次自体干细胞移植(ASCT),无论是否需要,而单独使用 G-CSF 动员的 VRd 患者中只有 13 例中的 8 例(62%)收集了足够的细胞。
我们的结论是,在接受 3 个周期 VRd 诱导后单独使用 G-CSF 进行动员,至少可以为一次 ASCT 提供足够的 PBSC。在已经接受 VRd 诱导的患者中,提前使用基于环磷酰胺的动员策略是有作用的,目的是为两次或更多次 ASCT 收集足够的干细胞。