Suppr超能文献

采用替代内镜治疗方式的递进策略是治疗术后和创伤性胰管破裂的有效策略。

A Step-Up Approach Using Alternative Endoscopic Modalities Is an Effective Strategy for Postoperative and Traumatic Pancreatic Duct Disruption.

机构信息

Department of Gastroenterology, Ankara City Hospital, University of Health Sciences, Bilkent Avenue, 06800, Çankaya, Ankara, Turkey.

出版信息

Dig Dis Sci. 2023 Sep;68(9):3745-3755. doi: 10.1007/s10620-023-07996-0. Epub 2023 Jun 26.

Abstract

BACKGROUND AND AIMS

Standard endotherapy for pancreatic duct (PD) disruption is pancreatic stenting and sphincterotomy. In patients refractory to standard treatment, treatment algorithm is currently not standardized. This study aims to report the 10-year experience with the endoscopic treatment of postoperative or traumatic PD disruption and to share our algorithmic approach.

METHODS

This retrospective study was conducted on 30 consecutive patients who underwent endoscopic treatment for postoperative (n = 26) or traumatic (n = 4) PD disruption between 2011 and 2021. Standard treatment was initially applied to all patients. Endoscopic modalities used with a step-up approach in patients unresponsive to standard treatment were stent upsizing and N-butyl-2-cyanoacrilate (NBCA) injection for partial disruption, and the bridging of the disruption with a stent and cystogastrostomy for complete disruption.

RESULTS

PD disruption was partial in 26 and complete in 4 patients. Cannulation and stenting of PD was successful in all patients and sphincterotomy was performed in 22 patients. Standard treatment was successful in 20 patients (66.6%). The resolution of PD disruption in 9 of 10 patients refractory to standard treatment was achieved with stent upsizing in 4, NBCA injection in 2, the bridging of the complete disruption in one, and cystogastrostomy after spontaneously and intentionally developed pseudocyst in one patient each. Overall, therapeutic success rate was 96.6% (100% for partial, 75% for complete disruption). Procedural complications occurred in 7 patients.

CONCLUSIONS

Standart treatment for PD disruption is usually effective. In patients refractory to standard treatment, the outcome may be improved by step-up approach using alternative endoscopic modalities.

摘要

背景与目的

标准的胰管(PD)破裂内镜治疗方法是胰管支架置入和括约肌切开术。对于标准治疗无效的患者,目前治疗方案尚无标准化。本研究旨在报告 10 年来内镜治疗术后或创伤性 PD 破裂的经验,并分享我们的治疗方法。

方法

本回顾性研究纳入了 2011 年至 2021 年期间接受内镜治疗的 30 例术后(n=26)或创伤性(n=4)PD 破裂患者。所有患者均首先接受标准治疗。对于标准治疗无效的患者,采用逐步升级的内镜方法,包括支架升级和部分破裂时的 N-丁基-2-氰基丙烯酸酯(NBCA)注射,以及完全破裂时的支架桥接和囊肿胃吻合术。

结果

26 例患者 PD 破裂为部分破裂,4 例患者为完全破裂。所有患者均成功进行 PD 管腔插管和支架置入,并对 22 例患者进行了括约肌切开术。20 例患者(66.6%)标准治疗成功。在 10 例对标准治疗有反应的患者中,9 例(4 例支架升级、2 例 NBCA 注射、1 例完全破裂支架桥接、1 例自发性和故意形成假性囊肿后囊肿胃吻合术)的 PD 破裂得到解决。总体而言,治疗成功率为 96.6%(部分破裂为 100%,完全破裂为 75%)。7 例患者出现操作相关并发症。

结论

PD 破裂的标准治疗通常是有效的。对于标准治疗无效的患者,通过使用替代内镜方法逐步升级的方法,可能会改善治疗效果。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验