Archila Pablo Antonio, Restrepo Silvia, Truscott de Mejía Anne-Marie, Molina Jorge
Vice-Presidency of Research and Creation, Universidad de los Andes, Cra 1 Nº 18A-12, 111711 Bogotá, Colombia.
School of Education, Universidad de los Andes, Cra 1 Nº 18A-12, 111711 Bogotá, Colombia.
Sci Educ (Dordr). 2023 Mar 27:1-19. doi: 10.1007/s11191-023-00428-5.
Even though it is widely held that the theory of evolution is one of the pillars of the biological sciences, as we begin the third decade of the twenty-first century, it is alarming how little we know about science, technology, engineering, and mathematics (STEM) majors and non-STEM majors' misconceptions about evolution in countries such as Brazil, Chile, Colombia, and Greece, to name a few. The situation is even more complicated if we acknowledge that contemporary educational approaches (e.g., student-centered learning) mean that students' misconceptions are one of the multiple aspects that influence the construction of meaningful learning. Here, we present a picture of Colombian STEM/non-STEM majors' misconceptions about evolution. Participants were 547 students from different STEM/non-STEM majors (278 females and 269 males, 16-24 years old). During 5 years (10 academic semesters), data were collected from students' responses to an 11-item questionnaire administered in a Colombian university. We hypothesized that the academic semester within these 5 years in which each student completed the instrument as well as respondents' age, gender, and/or major may influence their misconceptions about evolution. Results reveal that participants had a moderate understanding of evolution. Also, we found a limited understanding of microevolution among participants. Furthermore, cross-sectional analyses of differences in undergraduates' responses across demographic variables showed that despite apparent differences, these were not reliable since the differences were not statistically significant. Implications for evolution education are discussed.
尽管普遍认为进化理论是生物科学的支柱之一,但在21世纪进入第三个十年之际,令人担忧的是,在巴西、智利、哥伦比亚和希腊等国,我们对科学、技术、工程和数学(STEM)专业以及非STEM专业学生对进化的误解了解甚少,仅举几例。如果我们承认当代教育方法(例如以学生为中心的学习)意味着学生的误解是影响有意义学习构建的多个方面之一,那么情况就更加复杂了。在此,我们呈现了一幅哥伦比亚STEM/非STEM专业学生对进化的误解图景。参与者是来自不同STEM/非STEM专业的547名学生(278名女生和269名男生,年龄在16至24岁之间)。在5年(10个学术学期)的时间里,从哥伦比亚一所大学的学生对一份11项问卷的回答中收集数据。我们假设,在这5年中每个学生完成该问卷的学术学期以及受访者的年龄、性别和/或专业可能会影响他们对进化的误解。结果显示,参与者对进化有一定程度的理解。此外,我们发现参与者对微进化的理解有限。此外,对本科生在不同人口统计学变量上的回答差异进行的横断面分析表明,尽管存在明显差异,但这些差异并不可靠,因为差异没有统计学意义。文中讨论了对进化教育的启示。