Department of Ecology, Montana State University, Bozeman, MT 59717, USA.
CBE Life Sci Educ. 2012 Fall;11(3):248-59. doi: 10.1187/cbe.11-12-0107.
This study explores biology undergraduates' misconceptions about genetic drift. We use qualitative and quantitative methods to describe students' definitions, identify common misconceptions, and examine differences before and after instruction on genetic drift. We identify and describe five overarching categories that include 16 distinct misconceptions about genetic drift. The accuracy of students' conceptions ranges considerably, from responses indicating only superficial, if any, knowledge of any aspect of evolution to responses indicating knowledge of genetic drift but confusion about the nuances of genetic drift. After instruction, a significantly greater number of responses indicate some knowledge of genetic drift (p = 0.005), but 74.6% of responses still contain at least one misconception. We conclude by presenting a framework that organizes how students' conceptions of genetic drift change with instruction. We also articulate three hypotheses regarding undergraduates' conceptions of evolution in general and genetic drift in particular. We propose that: 1) students begin with undeveloped conceptions of evolution that do not recognize different mechanisms of change; 2) students develop more complex, but still inaccurate, conceptual frameworks that reflect experience with vocabulary but still lack deep understanding; and 3) some new misconceptions about genetic drift emerge as students comprehend more about evolution.
本研究探讨了生物学本科生对遗传漂变的误解。我们使用定性和定量方法来描述学生的定义,确定常见的误解,并检查遗传漂变教学前后的差异。我们确定并描述了五个总体类别,其中包括 16 个关于遗传漂变的独特误解。学生概念的准确性差异很大,从仅表示对进化的任何方面只有表面、如果有的话的知识的反应,到表示对遗传漂变的了解但对遗传漂变的细微差别感到困惑的反应。教学后,更多的反应表明对遗传漂变有一定的了解(p=0.005),但仍有 74.6%的反应至少包含一个误解。我们最后提出了一个框架,组织了学生对遗传漂变的概念随着教学的变化而变化。我们还阐述了关于大学生对进化一般和遗传漂变特别的三个假设。我们提出:1)学生开始对进化没有发展的概念,没有认识到不同的变化机制;2)学生发展出更复杂但仍然不准确的概念框架,反映了词汇的经验,但仍然缺乏深刻的理解;3)随着学生对进化的理解加深,一些关于遗传漂变的新误解出现了。