Sarbassova Gulzat, Kudaibergenova Aliya, Madaliyeva Zabira, Kassen Gulmira, Sadvakassova Zukhra, Ramazanova Samal, Ryskulova Madina
Department of Pedagogy and Psychology, Kazakh Humanitarian and Legal Innovation University in Semipalatinsk, Semey, Kazakhstan.
Department of Pedagogy and Educational Management, Al-Farabi Kazakh National University, Almaty, Kazakhstan.
Curr Psychol. 2023 May 11:1-13. doi: 10.1007/s12144-023-04712-z.
The study concerns the question of how much the emotional competence and the ability to cope with problems in one's own personality increase in the process of professional psychological education, for which students of different years of study were tested. The aim of this study is to deeply diagnose various components of psychological flexibility and the ability to cope with unexpected events among psychology students. The study involved 30 students from 1 to 4 years of university grade level participated into study, divided into 4 equal groups from. Based on testing various aspects of psychological flexibility, emotional intelligence test (EQ test), Emotion Regulation Questionnaire (ERQ) and D.V. Lyusin emotional intelligence instrument (Emin) were used; it was tested using Student's t-test and Kruskal-Wallis H-test to evaluate differences between three or more samples simultaneously. As a result of the study, the significant differences between all groups of participants and between the assessment of individual factors of psychological flexibility in different groups was accepted. Each of the groups demonstrated its specific characteristics of the relationship between emotional competence and coping with stress. Comparison of the results of students from different years of study showed that psychological education does not have a significant effect on emotional intelligence as an indicator of emotional flexibility, but positively affects the development of coping with stress, although in predominantly passive forms. The practical application of the research lies in improving psychology students' learning; the research results can be used as methods for determining psychological flexibility factors that require development in study groups.
该研究关注的问题是,在专业心理教育过程中,个人性格中的情绪能力和应对问题的能力会提升多少,为此对不同年级的学生进行了测试。本研究的目的是深入诊断心理学专业学生心理灵活性的各个组成部分以及应对意外事件的能力。该研究涉及30名大学1至4年级的学生参与,分为4个相等的组。基于对心理灵活性各个方面的测试,使用了情商测试(EQ测试)、情绪调节问卷(ERQ)和D.V.柳辛情绪智力量表(Emin);使用学生t检验和克鲁斯卡尔 - 沃利斯H检验来同时评估三个或更多样本之间的差异。研究结果表明,所有参与组之间以及不同组中心理灵活性个体因素评估之间存在显著差异。每个组都展示了其在情绪能力与应对压力关系方面的特定特征。对不同年级学生的结果比较表明,心理教育作为情绪灵活性指标对情商没有显著影响,但对应对压力的发展有积极影响,尽管主要是以被动形式。该研究的实际应用在于改善心理学专业学生的学习;研究结果可作为确定学习小组中需要培养的心理灵活性因素的方法。