• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

小农户与大科技:缅甸脸书上的农业商业与知识

Small farmers, big tech: agrarian commerce and knowledge on Myanmar Facebook.

作者信息

Faxon Hilary Oliva

机构信息

Department of Society and Conservation, University of Montana, Missoula, MT USA.

Department of Food and Resource Economics, University of Copenhagen, Copenhagen, Denmark.

出版信息

Agric Human Values. 2023 May 6:1-15. doi: 10.1007/s10460-023-10446-2.

DOI:10.1007/s10460-023-10446-2
PMID:37359840
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC10163574/
Abstract

Despite increasing attention to the sensors, drones, robots, and apps permeating agri-food systems, little attention has been paid to social media, perhaps the most ubiquitous digital technology in rural areas globally. This article draws on analysis of farming groups on Myanmar Facebook to posit social media as : a generic technology incorporated into existing circuits of economic and social exchange that becomes a site of agrarian innovation. Through analysis of an original archive of popular posts collected from Myanmar-language Facebook pages and groups related to agriculture, I explore the ways that farmers, traders, agronomists and agricultural companies use social media to further agrarian commerce and knowledge. These activities evidence that farmers use Facebook not only to exchange market or planting information, but also to interact in ways structured by existing social, political and economic relations. More broadly, my analysis builds on insights from STS and postcolonial computing to disrupt assumptions about the totalizing power of digital technologies and affirm the relevance of social media to agriculture, while inviting new research into the surprising, ambiguous relationships between small farmers and big tech.

摘要

尽管人们越来越关注渗透到农业食品系统中的传感器、无人机、机器人和应用程序,但社交媒体——或许是全球农村地区最普遍存在的数字技术——却很少受到关注。本文通过对缅甸脸书上的农业群组进行分析,将社交媒体定位为:一种融入现有经济和社会交流循环的通用技术,它成为了农业创新的场所。通过分析从缅甸语脸书页面和与农业相关的群组中收集的热门帖子原始档案,我探讨了农民、贸易商、农学家和农业公司利用社交媒体促进农业商业和知识传播的方式。这些活动表明,农民使用脸书不仅是为了交流市场或种植信息,也是为了以由现有社会、政治和经济关系构建的方式进行互动。更广泛地说,我的分析基于科学技术与社会(STS)以及后殖民计算的见解,以打破对数字技术总体化力量的假设,并肯定社交媒体与农业的相关性,同时引发对小农户与大型科技公司之间令人惊讶且模糊的关系的新研究。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/3507/10163574/5504078f06b9/10460_2023_10446_Fig4_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/3507/10163574/a18f194addf8/10460_2023_10446_Fig1_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/3507/10163574/75db1d2dd1d3/10460_2023_10446_Fig2_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/3507/10163574/60d0060f793c/10460_2023_10446_Fig3_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/3507/10163574/5504078f06b9/10460_2023_10446_Fig4_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/3507/10163574/a18f194addf8/10460_2023_10446_Fig1_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/3507/10163574/75db1d2dd1d3/10460_2023_10446_Fig2_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/3507/10163574/60d0060f793c/10460_2023_10446_Fig3_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/3507/10163574/5504078f06b9/10460_2023_10446_Fig4_HTML.jpg

相似文献

1
Small farmers, big tech: agrarian commerce and knowledge on Myanmar Facebook.小农户与大科技:缅甸脸书上的农业商业与知识
Agric Human Values. 2023 May 6:1-15. doi: 10.1007/s10460-023-10446-2.
2
Global case study of digital marketing on social media by a top soda brand.全球顶级苏打饮料品牌社交媒体数字化营销案例研究。
Health Promot Int. 2022 Oct 1;37(5). doi: 10.1093/heapro/daac133.
3
[Peasant women and agrarian life in Latin America].[拉丁美洲的农村妇女与农业生活]
Tiers Monde (1960). 1985 Apr-Jul;26(102):325-34.
4
Social Media Use by Young People Living in Conflict-Affected Regions of Myanmar.年轻人在缅甸受冲突影响地区使用社交媒体的情况。
Cyberpsychol Behav Soc Netw. 2020 Dec;23(12):876-888. doi: 10.1089/cyber.2020.0131.
5
Digitalization and the third food regime.数字化与第三种食物体系
Agric Human Values. 2021;38(3):641-655. doi: 10.1007/s10460-020-10161-2. Epub 2020 Oct 13.
6
The portrayal and perceptions of cesarean section in Mexican media Facebook pages: a mixed-methods study.墨西哥媒体 Facebook 页面中对剖宫产的描述和看法:一项混合方法研究。
Reprod Health. 2022 Feb 22;19(1):49. doi: 10.1186/s12978-022-01351-8.
7
Examining the Influence on Perceptions of Endometriosis via Analysis of Social Media Posts: Cross-sectional Study.通过社交媒体帖子分析探讨对子宫内膜异位症认知的影响:横断面研究
JMIR Form Res. 2022 Mar 18;6(3):e31135. doi: 10.2196/31135.
8
Farmers' Knowledge, Attitude, and Adoption of Smart Agriculture Technology in Taiwan.台湾农民对智慧农业技术的认知、态度和采用。
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2020 Oct 3;17(19):7236. doi: 10.3390/ijerph17197236.
9
Exploring Hospitals' Use of Facebook: Thematic Analysis.探索医院对脸书的使用:主题分析
J Med Internet Res. 2018 May 16;20(5):e190. doi: 10.2196/jmir.9549.
10
Social networks influence farming practices and agrarian sustainability.社交网络影响农业实践和农业可持续性。
PLoS One. 2021 Jan 7;16(1):e0244619. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0244619. eCollection 2021.

引用本文的文献

1
Configuration analysis of crop-pollination service management: a novel insight from the theory of planned behavior.作物授粉服务管理的配置分析:基于计划行为理论的新见解
PLoS One. 2025 Jul 11;20(7):e0326226. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0326226. eCollection 2025.
2
Meta-analysis of the impacts of digital information interventions on agricultural development.数字信息干预对农业发展影响的荟萃分析。
Glob Food Sec. 2025 Jun;45:100866. doi: 10.1016/j.gfs.2025.100866.

本文引用的文献

1
New but for whom? Discourses of innovation in precision agriculture.新事物,但为了谁?精准农业中的创新话语。
Agric Human Values. 2021;38(4):1181-1199. doi: 10.1007/s10460-021-10244-8. Epub 2021 Jul 14.
2
'I will know it when I taste it': trust, food materialities and social media in Chinese alternative food networks.“尝过便知”:中国替代食品网络中的信任、食物物质性与社交媒体
Agric Human Values. 2021;38(2):365-380. doi: 10.1007/s10460-020-10155-0. Epub 2020 Oct 13.
3
Digitalization and the third food regime.数字化与第三种食物体系
Agric Human Values. 2021;38(3):641-655. doi: 10.1007/s10460-020-10161-2. Epub 2020 Oct 13.
4
Interpersonal Goals as Predictors of Facebook Use, Social Capital, and Envy.人际关系目标对 Facebook 使用、社会资本和嫉妒的预测作用。
Cyberpsychol Behav Soc Netw. 2020 Apr;23(4):257-263. doi: 10.1089/cyber.2019.0446. Epub 2020 Feb 25.
5
The politics of biofuels, land and agrarian change: editors' introduction.生物燃料、土地和农地变化的政治:编辑介绍。
J Peasant Stud. 2010;37(4):575-92. doi: 10.1080/03066150.2010.512448.