Suppr超能文献

评估一种即时检测设备测量血清和全血中非酯化脂肪酸浓度的诊断准确性。

Evaluation of the diagnostic accuracy of a point-of-care device to measure concentrations of nonesterified fatty acids in serum and whole blood.

作者信息

Venjakob P L, Bretzinger L F, Borchardt S, Weber C, Heuwieser W

机构信息

Clinic for Animal Reproduction, Faculty of Veterinary Medicine, Freie Universität Berlin, 14163 Berlin, Germany.

Clinic for Ruminants, Justus-Liebig-Universität Gießen, Frankfurter Str. 104, 35392 Gießen, Germany.

出版信息

JDS Commun. 2023 Feb 9;4(3):219-224. doi: 10.3168/jdsc.2022-0269. eCollection 2023 May.

Abstract

The objective of this study was to compare measurements of nonesterified fatty acids (NEFA) between the gold standard diagnostic laboratory method and a handheld NEFA meter (Qucare Pro meter, DFI Co. Ltd.). Three experiments were conducted to study the usability of the meter. In experiment 1 we compared results of the meter obtained from measurements in serum and whole blood with results of the gold standard method. Based on the results of experiment 1 we compared the results measured by the meter in whole blood with results obtained from the gold standard method on a larger scale, as we wanted to omit the step of centrifugation with the cow-side test. In experiment 3 we determined the influence of ambient temperature on measurements. Overall, blood samples of 231 cows were collected between 14 and 20 d in milk. The Spearman correlation coefficients (ρ) were calculated and Bland-Altman plots were created to compare the accuracy of the NEFA meter with the gold standard. In addition, in experiment 2 receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve analyses were performed, to define thresholds for the NEFA meter to detect cows with a NEFA concentration above 0.3, 0.4, and 0.7 mEq/L. In experiment 1, there was a high correlation between NEFA concentrations in whole blood and serum determined by the NEFA meter and the gold standard (ρ = 0.90 for measurement in whole blood; ρ = 0.93 for measurement in serum). In experiment 2, the measurement in whole blood with the NEFA meter was compared with the gold standard. Despite a lower correlation (ρ = 0.79) the ROC curve analyses revealed a high specificity and a moderate sensitivity for lower cut-points (i.e., 0.3 and 0.4 mEq/L). The NEFA meter underestimated especially high concentration of >0.7 mEq/L. Considering thresholds of 0.3, 0.4, and 0.7 mEq/L measured by the gold standard test, sensitivity and specificity were 59.1% and 96.7%, 79.0% and 95.4%, and 86.4% and 95.6%, respectively, when using 0.3, 0.3, and 0.4 mEq/L as thresholds for the NEFA meter. Accuracy was 74.1%, 88.3%, and 93.8% for the 3 thresholds tested. Experiment 3 showed that measurements should be conducted at approximately 21°C (ρ = 0.73) as correlations were poor at 6.2°C and 15.1°C (ρ = 0.18 and 0.22, respectively).

摘要

本研究的目的是比较金标准诊断实验室方法与手持式非酯化脂肪酸(NEFA)测定仪(Qucare Pro测定仪,DFI有限公司)对非酯化脂肪酸的测量结果。进行了三项实验来研究该测定仪的可用性。在实验1中,我们将该测定仪在血清和全血中测量得到的结果与金标准方法的结果进行了比较。基于实验1的结果,由于我们希望在奶牛现场检测时省略离心步骤,因此我们在更大规模上比较了该测定仪在全血中测量的结果与金标准方法得到的结果。在实验3中,我们确定了环境温度对测量的影响。总体而言,采集了231头处于产奶14至20天的奶牛的血样。计算了Spearman相关系数(ρ),并绘制了Bland-Altman图,以比较NEFA测定仪与金标准的准确性。此外,在实验2中进行了受试者工作特征(ROC)曲线分析,以确定NEFA测定仪检测NEFA浓度高于0.3、0.4和0.7 mEq/L奶牛的阈值。在实验1中,NEFA测定仪测定的全血和血清中的NEFA浓度与金标准之间存在高度相关性(全血测量的ρ = 0.90;血清测量的ρ = 0.93)。在实验2中,将NEFA测定仪在全血中的测量结果与金标准进行了比较。尽管相关性较低(ρ = 0.79),但ROC曲线分析显示,对于较低的切点(即0.3和0.4 mEq/L),具有高特异性和中等敏感性。NEFA测定仪尤其低估了>0.7 mEq/L的高浓度。考虑到金标准检测测量的0.3、0.4和0.7 mEq/L的阈值,当将0.3、0.3和0.4 mEq/L用作NEFA测定仪的阈值时,敏感性和特异性分别为59.1%和96.7%、79.0%和95.4%、86.4%和95.6%。对于测试的3个阈值,准确性分别为74.1%、88.3%和93.8%。实验3表明,测量应在约21°C下进行(ρ = 0.73),因为在6.2°C和15.1°C时相关性较差(ρ分别为0.18和0.22)。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/9a29/10285242/2240ebd2f2af/fx1.jpg

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验