• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

Atellica系统的精密度和准确性验证研究

Precision and trueness verification study of an Atellica system.

作者信息

Vílchez Rodríguez Alberto, González Cantó Julia, Esteve Poblador Sara, Valldecabres Ortiz Carmen, Estela Burriel Pedro L

机构信息

Area of Biological Diagnosis, La Ribera University Hospital, Alzira, Spain.

出版信息

Adv Lab Med. 2020 Oct 29;1(4):20200096. doi: 10.1515/almed-2020-0096. eCollection 2020 Dec.

DOI:10.1515/almed-2020-0096
PMID:37360617
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC10243148/
Abstract

OBJECTIVES

Clinical laboratories should use only validated procedures. Precision is an important factor in the validation and verification of a new measurement procedure. Our objective was to verify the precision and trueness of different analysers used for the biochemical and immunochemical characterization of analytes.

METHODS

Advia 1800, Immulite2000 and CentaurXP analysers and the AtellicaSolution system were used. Five analytes were characterized biochemically, whereas another five analytes were characterized immunochemically. Imprecision was assessed using BioRad and Siemens control materials. Within-run and between-run imprecision were calculated by analysing three replicates of each control in a single run every day for five days. Bias was assessed using 40 samples of serum by the analysis of differences and linear regression.

RESULTS

The within-run and between-run imprecision values obtained with the new measurement procedure were lower than the ones claimed by the manufacturer for all the analytes studied. In the bias study, a proportional but not constant systematic error was observed in some analytes.

CONCLUSIONS

The coefficients of variation obtained with AtellicaSolution verified both, the imprecision specifications claimed by the manufacturer and by the laboratory. The conditions of calibration should be revised for some parameters and a wider range of samples should be used.

摘要

目的

临床实验室应仅使用经过验证的程序。精密度是新测量程序验证和核查中的一个重要因素。我们的目的是验证用于分析物生化和免疫化学特性分析的不同分析仪的精密度和准确性。

方法

使用了Advia 1800、Immulite2000和CentaurXP分析仪以及AtellicaSolution系统。对五种分析物进行生化特性分析,另外五种分析物进行免疫化学特性分析。使用BioRad和西门子对照材料评估不精密度。通过连续五天每天在一次运行中分析每个对照的三个重复样品来计算批内和批间不精密度。使用40份血清样本通过差异分析和线性回归评估偏倚。

结果

对于所有研究的分析物,新测量程序获得的批内和批间不精密度值均低于制造商声称的值。在偏倚研究中,在一些分析物中观察到成比例但非恒定的系统误差。

结论

AtellicaSolution获得的变异系数既验证了制造商声称的不精密度规格,也验证了实验室声称的不精密度规格。应针对某些参数修订校准条件,并应使用更广泛的样本。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/ce44/10243148/c5c744e408da/j_almed-2020-0096_fig_001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/ce44/10243148/c5c744e408da/j_almed-2020-0096_fig_001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/ce44/10243148/c5c744e408da/j_almed-2020-0096_fig_001.jpg

相似文献

1
Precision and trueness verification study of an Atellica system.Atellica系统的精密度和准确性验证研究
Adv Lab Med. 2020 Oct 29;1(4):20200096. doi: 10.1515/almed-2020-0096. eCollection 2020 Dec.
2
Verification of point-of-care analysers for C-reactive protein, lipid studies and glycated haemoglobin.即时检验分析器用于 C 反应蛋白、脂类研究和糖化血红蛋白的验证。
Pathology. 2023 Dec;55(7):989-999. doi: 10.1016/j.pathol.2023.07.004. Epub 2023 Sep 9.
3
[Analytical performance verification protocols and performance specifications of platelet-dependent von Willebrand factor activity testing].[血小板依赖性血管性血友病因子活性检测的分析性能验证方案及性能规范]
Zhonghua Yi Xue Za Zhi. 2022 Oct 11;102(37):2969-2974. doi: 10.3760/cma.j.cn112137-20220408-00742.
4
Verification of examination procedures for 72 biochemical parameters on the atellica clinical chemistry and immunoassay analyzers.对 atellica 临床化学和免疫分析仪器上 72 项生化参数的检验程序进行验证。
Scand J Clin Lab Invest. 2022 Sep;82(5):419-431. doi: 10.1080/00365513.2022.2102541. Epub 2022 Aug 3.
5
Analytical performance evaluation of a new integrated clinical chemistry and immunoassay analyzer.一种新型集成临床化学与免疫分析分析仪的分析性能评估
Pract Lab Med. 2024 Sep 2;41:e00427. doi: 10.1016/j.plabm.2024.e00427. eCollection 2024 Aug.
6
Verification of Atellica 1500 and comparison with Iris urine analyser and urine culture.验证 Atellica 1500 并与 Iris 尿液分析仪和尿液培养进行比较。
Biochem Med (Zagreb). 2022 Feb 15;32(1):010701. doi: 10.11613/BM.2022.010701. Epub 2021 Dec 15.
7
Evaluation of imprecision, bias and total error of clinical chemistry analysers.临床化学分析仪的不精密度、偏倚及总误差评估。
Indian J Clin Biochem. 2015 Jan;30(1):104-8. doi: 10.1007/s12291-014-0448-y. Epub 2014 Jun 22.
8
Performance evaluation of Siemens Atellica enhanced estradiol assay.西门子Atellica增强型雌二醇检测法的性能评估
Adv Lab Med. 2020 Jan 7;1(1):20190009. doi: 10.1515/almed-2019-0009. eCollection 2020 Mar.
9
Verification of automated latex-enhanced particle immunoturbidimetric D-Dimer assays on different analytical platforms and comparability of test results.验证不同分析平台上自动乳胶增强的颗粒免疫比浊法 D-二聚体检测的准确性以及检测结果的可比性。
Biochem Med (Zagreb). 2020 Oct 15;30(3):030705. doi: 10.11613/BM.2020.030705.
10
Third-party verification of total and specific immunoglobulin E on analyzer Immulite® 2000XPi.免疫印迹法检测分析仪 Immulite 2000XPi 上总免疫球蛋白 E 和特异性免疫球蛋白 E 的第三方验证。
Clin Chim Acta. 2020 Jan;500:28-33. doi: 10.1016/j.cca.2019.09.015. Epub 2019 Oct 10.