• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

选择留下:了解安大略省南部四个非都市县的移民留存情况。

Choosing to Stay: Understanding Immigrant Retention in Four Non-metropolitan Counties in Southern Ontario.

作者信息

Kelly Melissa, Nguyen Michelle

机构信息

Canada Excellence Research Chair in Migration and Integration Program, Toronto Metropolitan University, 44 Gerrard Street East, CUI-330, Toronto, ON M5B 1G3 Canada.

出版信息

J Int Migr Integr. 2023 Apr 11:1-21. doi: 10.1007/s12134-023-01034-8.

DOI:10.1007/s12134-023-01034-8
PMID:37360643
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC10089691/
Abstract

Every year, Ontario attracts more international migrants than any other province in Canada. The majority of these immigrants settle in the Greater Toronto Area (GTA). Policymakers at the federal, provincial, and municipal levels have identified a need to reduce the concentration of immigrants and to spread the benefits of immigration more evenly across the province. Despite policy and community interventions, most immigrants continue to move to larger centres. Previous academic research has mostly focused on the challenges smaller cities face in trying to attract and retain immigrants, suggesting that smaller cities lack what larger cities have to offer. We have taken another approach and instead considered what makes some immigrants choose to stay in non-metropolitan areas. Focusing on two sets of adjoining counties in Southern Ontario (Grey & Bruce counties and Lanark & Renfrew counties), we adopted a qualitative case study approach to understand what has led some immigrants to live in one of these regional areas for 3 years or more. The findings reveal that living outside of a metropolitan area comes with many benefits including relative affordability and easy access to nature. Moreover, study participants were inclined to stay in the counties under study because they could meet their needs there, at least for the time being. Interestingly, only some of the study participants viewed social attachments as a reason to stay. These were mostly individuals who had lived in one of the counties for a significant amount of time.

摘要

安大略省每年吸引的国际移民比加拿大其他任何省份都多。这些移民中的大多数都定居在大多伦多地区(GTA)。联邦、省和市各级的政策制定者都意识到有必要减少移民的集中程度,并将移民带来的好处更均匀地分布在全省各地。尽管有政策和社区干预措施,但大多数移民仍继续迁往更大的中心城市。以往的学术研究大多集中在小城市在吸引和留住移民方面所面临的挑战,表明小城市缺乏大城市所能提供的条件。我们采取了另一种方法,转而考虑是什么让一些移民选择留在非大都市地区。以安大略省南部的两组相邻县(格雷县和布鲁斯县以及拉纳克县和伦弗鲁县)为重点,我们采用了定性案例研究方法,以了解是什么导致一些移民在这些地区之一居住了三年或更长时间。研究结果表明,居住在大都市地区以外有许多好处,包括相对较低的生活成本和方便接触自然。此外,研究参与者倾向于留在所研究的县,因为他们至少在目前能够在那里满足自己的需求。有趣的是,只有一些研究参与者将社会依恋视为留下来的一个原因。这些大多是在其中一个县生活了很长时间的人。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/a505/10089691/511296cc4cbb/12134_2023_1034_Fig3_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/a505/10089691/dd546a54a1ea/12134_2023_1034_Fig1_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/a505/10089691/6f71737d4675/12134_2023_1034_Fig2_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/a505/10089691/511296cc4cbb/12134_2023_1034_Fig3_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/a505/10089691/dd546a54a1ea/12134_2023_1034_Fig1_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/a505/10089691/6f71737d4675/12134_2023_1034_Fig2_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/a505/10089691/511296cc4cbb/12134_2023_1034_Fig3_HTML.jpg

相似文献

1
Choosing to Stay: Understanding Immigrant Retention in Four Non-metropolitan Counties in Southern Ontario.选择留下:了解安大略省南部四个非都市县的移民留存情况。
J Int Migr Integr. 2023 Apr 11:1-21. doi: 10.1007/s12134-023-01034-8.
2
Examining the relationship between neighbourhood deprivation and mental health service use of immigrants in Ontario, Canada: a cross-sectional study.考察加拿大安大略省邻里贫困与移民心理健康服务利用之间的关系:一项横断面研究。
BMJ Open. 2015 Mar 13;5(3):e006690. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2014-006690.
3
Linking national immigration data to provincial repositories: The case of Canada.将国家移民数据与省级资料库相链接:以加拿大为例。
Int J Popul Data Sci. 2021 May 25;6(1):1412. doi: 10.23889/ijpds.v6i1.1412.
4
A comparison of health access between permanent residents, undocumented immigrants and refugee claimants in Toronto, Canada.加拿大多伦多永久居民、无证移民和难民申请人之间的医疗服务可及性比较。
J Immigr Minor Health. 2014 Feb;16(1):165-76. doi: 10.1007/s10903-012-9740-1.
5
Immigrant health, place effect and regional disparities in Canada.加拿大的移民健康、地点效应和区域差异。
Soc Sci Med. 2013 Dec;98:8-17. doi: 10.1016/j.socscimed.2013.08.040. Epub 2013 Sep 8.
6
The future of Cochrane Neonatal.考克兰新生儿协作网的未来。
Early Hum Dev. 2020 Nov;150:105191. doi: 10.1016/j.earlhumdev.2020.105191. Epub 2020 Sep 12.
7
Race, class and the shaping of a policy for immigrants: the case of the Netherlands.种族、阶级与移民政策的形成:以荷兰为例。
Int Migr. 1987 Mar;25(1):5-20. doi: 10.1111/j.1468-2435.1987.tb00122.x.
8
Prostate cancer incidence among immigrant men in Ontario, Canada: a population-based retrospective cohort study.加拿大安大略省移民男性中的前列腺癌发病率:一项基于人群的回顾性队列研究。
CMAJ Open. 2022 Nov 1;10(4):E956-E963. doi: 10.9778/cmajo.20220069. Print 2022 Oct-Dec.
9
Coverage and Framing of Immigration Policy in US Newspapers.美国报纸对移民政策的报道和框架
Milbank Q. 2022 Mar;100(1):78-101. doi: 10.1111/1468-0009.12547. Epub 2021 Dec 22.
10
Association of Immigrant and Refugee Status With Risk Factors for Exposure to Violent Assault Among Youths and Young Adults in Canada.移民和难民身份与加拿大青年和年轻人遭受暴力袭击风险因素的关联。
JAMA Netw Open. 2020 Mar 2;3(3):e200375. doi: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2020.0375.

本文引用的文献

1
Is there no "I" in team? Potential bias in key informant interviews when asking individuals to represent a collective perspective.团队中没有“我”吗?在要求个人代表集体观点时,关键知情人访谈中可能存在潜在偏见。
PLoS One. 2022 Jan 14;17(1):e0261452. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0261452. eCollection 2022.
2
The Role of Place Attachment in Promoting Refugees' Well-Being and Resettlement: A Literature Review.地方依恋在促进难民福祉与重新安置中的作用:一项文献综述
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2021 Oct 20;18(21):11021. doi: 10.3390/ijerph182111021.
3
Is Social Contact With the Resident Population a Prerequisite of Well-Being and Place Attachment? The Case of Refugees in Rural Regions of Germany.
与当地居民的社交接触是幸福安康和地方依恋感的先决条件吗?以德国农村地区的难民为例。
Front Sociol. 2020 Dec 18;5:578495. doi: 10.3389/fsoc.2020.578495. eCollection 2020.
4
Examining the relationship between social support availability, urban center size, and self-perceived mental health of recent immigrants to Canada: a mixed-methods analysis.考察加拿大新移民的社会支持可得性、城市中心规模与自我感知心理健康之间的关系:一项混合方法分析。
Soc Sci Med. 2015 Mar;128:220-30. doi: 10.1016/j.socscimed.2015.01.036. Epub 2015 Jan 22.
5
The migration decisions of physicians in Canada: the roles of immigrant status and spousal characteristics.加拿大医生的移民决策:移民身份和配偶特征的作用。
Soc Sci Med. 2012 Nov;75(9):1581-8. doi: 10.1016/j.socscimed.2012.07.009. Epub 2012 Jul 27.
6
Conceptualising Irish rural youth migration: a biographical approach.
Int J Popul Geogr. 2000 May-Jun;6(3):229-43. doi: 10.1002/1099-1220(200005/06)6:3<229::AID-IJPG185>3.0.CO;2-R.