Landová Eva, Rádlová Silvie, Pidnebesna Anna, Tomeček David, Janovcová Markéta, Peléšková Šárka, Sedláčková Kristýna, Štolhoferová Iveta, Polák Jakub, Hlinka Jaroslav, Frynta Daniel
Department of Zoology, Faculty of Science, Charles University, Prague, Czechia.
National Institute of Mental Health, Klecany, Czechia.
Front Psychiatry. 2023 Jun 8;14:1196785. doi: 10.3389/fpsyt.2023.1196785. eCollection 2023.
The administration of questionnaires presents an easy way of obtaining important knowledge about phobic patients. However, it is not well known how these subjective measurements correspond to the patient's objective condition. Our study aimed to compare scores on questionnaires and image evaluation to the objective measurements of the behavioral approach test (BAT) and the neurophysiological effect of spiders extracted from fMRI measurements. The objective was to explore how reliably subjective statements about spiders and physiological and behavioral parameters discriminate between phobics and non-phobics, and what are the best predictors of overall brain activation.
Based on a clinical interview, 165 subjects were assigned to either a "phobic" or low-fear "control" group. Finally, 30 arachnophobic and 32 healthy control subjects (with low fear of spiders) participated in this study. They completed several questionnaires (SPQ, SNAQ, DS-R) and underwent a behavioral approach test (BAT) with a live tarantula. Then, they were measured in fMRI while watching blocks of pictures including spiders and snakes. Finally, the respondents rated all the visual stimuli according to perceived fear. We proposed the Spider Fear Index (SFI) as a value characterizing the level of spider fear, computed based on the fMRI measurements. We then treated this variable as the "neurophysiological effect of spiders" and examined its contribution to the respondents' fear ratings of the stimuli seen during the fMRI using the redundancy analysis (RDA).
The results for fear ranks revealed that the SFI, SNAQ, DS-R, and SPQ scores had a significant effect, while BAT and SPQ scores loaded in the same direction of the first multivariate axis. The SFI was strongly correlated with both SPQ and BAT scores in the pooled sample of arachnophobic and healthy control subjects.
Both SPQ and BAT scores have a high informative value about the subject's fear of spiders and together with subjective emotional evaluation of picture stimuli can be reliable predictors of spider phobia. These parameters provide easy and non-expensive but reliable measurement wherever more expensive devices such as magnetic resonance are not available. However, SFI still reflects individual variability within the phobic group, identifying individuals with higher brain activation, which may relate to more severe phobic reactions or other sources of fMRI signal variability.
问卷调查是获取有关恐惧症患者重要信息的一种简便方法。然而,这些主观测量与患者的客观状况之间的对应关系尚不清楚。我们的研究旨在比较问卷调查得分和图像评估得分与行为趋近测试(BAT)的客观测量结果以及从功能磁共振成像(fMRI)测量中提取的蜘蛛的神经生理效应。目的是探讨关于蜘蛛的主观陈述以及生理和行为参数在区分恐惧症患者和非恐惧症患者方面的可靠性如何,以及大脑整体激活的最佳预测指标是什么。
基于临床访谈,165名受试者被分为“恐惧症”组或低恐惧“对照组”。最终,30名蜘蛛恐惧症患者和32名健康对照者(对蜘蛛恐惧程度低)参与了本研究。他们完成了几份问卷(SPQ、SNAQ、DS-R),并对一只活狼蛛进行了行为趋近测试(BAT)。然后,在他们观看包含蜘蛛和蛇的图片组时进行fMRI测量。最后,受访者根据感知到的恐惧对所有视觉刺激进行评分。我们提出了蜘蛛恐惧指数(SFI)作为表征蜘蛛恐惧程度的一个值,该值基于fMRI测量计算得出。然后,我们将这个变量视为“蜘蛛的神经生理效应”,并使用冗余分析(RDA)研究其对受访者在fMRI期间看到的刺激的恐惧评分的贡献。
恐惧等级结果显示,SFI、SNAQ、DS-R和SPQ得分有显著影响,而BAT和SPQ得分在第一个多变量轴的同一方向上加载。在蜘蛛恐惧症患者和健康对照者的合并样本中,SFI与SPQ和BAT得分均密切相关。
SPQ和BAT得分对于受试者对蜘蛛的恐惧都具有很高的信息价值,并且与图片刺激的主观情绪评估一起可以作为蜘蛛恐惧症的可靠预测指标。在无法使用磁共振等更昂贵设备的情况下,这些参数提供了简单、廉价但可靠的测量方法。然而,SFI仍然反映了恐惧症组内的个体差异,识别出大脑激活程度较高的个体,这可能与更严重的恐惧反应或fMRI信号变异性的其他来源有关。