• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

决策表的阈值分析

Threshold analysis of decision tables.

作者信息

Glasziou P, Hilden J

出版信息

Med Decis Making. 1986 Jul-Sep;6(3):161-8. doi: 10.1177/0272989X8600600306.

DOI:10.1177/0272989X8600600306
PMID:3736378
Abstract

When a decision table is used to find a maximum expected utility testing strategy, it is based on a given prior probability distribution of diseases. In the two-disease situation, a threshold analysis over all prior probabilities can be done using threshold transformations of the points of indifference between treatments. This results in a set of prior probability intervals each with its own unique decision rule. The Boolean expression for the table indicates the acceptable testing strategies. A decision table analysis may then be extended to include invasive or costly investigations. The technique represents a saving in time and effort compared with standard decision tree approaches, especially where investigative recommendations are to be made for a broad range of prior probabilities, e.g., where initial symptoms and signs are considered before the investigations.

摘要

当使用决策表来寻找最大期望效用测试策略时,它基于给定的疾病先验概率分布。在两种疾病的情况下,可以使用治疗之间无差异点的阈值变换对所有先验概率进行阈值分析。这会产生一组先验概率区间,每个区间都有其独特的决策规则。该表的布尔表达式表示可接受的测试策略。然后,可以将决策表分析扩展到包括侵入性或昂贵的检查。与标准决策树方法相比,该技术节省了时间和精力,特别是在要针对广泛的先验概率提出调查建议的情况下,例如在进行检查之前考虑初始症状和体征的情况。

相似文献

1
Threshold analysis of decision tables.决策表的阈值分析
Med Decis Making. 1986 Jul-Sep;6(3):161-8. doi: 10.1177/0272989X8600600306.
2
Decision tables and logic in decision analysis.
Med Decis Making. 1986 Jul-Sep;6(3):154-60. doi: 10.1177/0272989X8600600305.
3
A computer simulation of medical decision strategy performance.
Comput Biomed Res. 1985 Dec;18(6):563-75. doi: 10.1016/0010-4809(85)90031-x.
4
Threshold analysis using diagnostic tests with multiple results.
Med Decis Making. 1989 Apr-Jun;9(2):91-103. doi: 10.1177/0272989X8900900204.
5
Derived thresholds. Determining the diagnostic probabilities at which clinicians initiate testing and treatment.衍生阈值。确定临床医生开始检测和治疗时的诊断概率。
Med Decis Making. 1983;3(2):155-68. doi: 10.1177/0272989X8300300203.
6
Decision analysis with cumulative prospect theory.基于累积前景理论的决策分析
Med Decis Making. 2000 Oct-Dec;20(4):404-12. doi: 10.1177/0272989X0002000404.
7
To test or not to test--to treat or not to treat: the decision-threshold approach to patient management.检测还是不检测——治疗还是不治疗:患者管理的决策阈值方法
J Gen Intern Med. 1986 May-Jun;1(3):177-82. doi: 10.1007/BF02602334.
8
Use of augmented decision tables to convert probabilistic data into clinical algorithms for the diagnosis of appendicitis.使用增强决策表将概率数据转换为用于阑尾炎诊断的临床算法。
Proc Annu Symp Comput Appl Med Care. 1991:686-90.
9
Management of the patient with suspected temporal arteritis a decision-analytic approach.疑似颞动脉炎患者的管理:一种决策分析方法。
Ophthalmology. 2005 May;112(5):744-56. doi: 10.1016/j.ophtha.2005.01.031.
10
The threshold approach to clinical decision making.临床决策的阈值方法。
N Engl J Med. 1980 May 15;302(20):1109-17. doi: 10.1056/NEJM198005153022003.

引用本文的文献

1
Assessment of diagnostic capacity and decision-making based on the 2015 American Thyroid Association ultrasound classification system.基于2015年美国甲状腺协会超声分类系统的诊断能力评估与决策制定
World J Methodol. 2022 May 20;12(3):148-163. doi: 10.5662/wjm.v12.i3.148.
2
Representation of clinical practice guidelines in conventional and augmented decision tables.传统决策表和增强决策表中临床实践指南的呈现
J Am Med Inform Assoc. 1997 Sep-Oct;4(5):382-93. doi: 10.1136/jamia.1997.0040382.