Wallace Claire, Mytna-Kurekova Lucia, Leon Margarita, O'Reilly Jacqueline, Blome Constantin, Bussi Margarita, Faith Becky, Finney Mark, Leschke Janine, Ruffa Chiara, Russell Emma, AhSchøyen Mi, Thurer Matthias, Unt Marge, Verdin Rachel
University of Aberdeen, Aberdeen, Scotland.
Slovak Academy of Sciences, Bratislava, Slovakia.
Int J Community Wellbeing. 2023 May 9:1-18. doi: 10.1007/s42413-023-00189-7.
The COVID lockdowns were characterised by new forms of governmentality as lives were disrupted and controlled through the vertical transmission of biopolitics by the state. The paper considers how this was experienced by academics in 11 different countries through analysis of diaries written during the first lockdown. The paper asks if communities can offer an alternative to governmentality by looking at three levels: the national, the neighbourhood and the personal. Whilst at a national level the idea of community was instrumentalised to encourage compliance to extraordinary measures, at the local level community compassion through helping neighbours encouraged horizontal connections that could offer a "space" within the dominant logic of governmentality. At the level of personal communities, the digitalisation of social relationships helped to create supportive networks over widely dispersed areas but these were narrowly rather than widely focused, avoiding critical discussion.
新冠疫情封锁的特点是出现了新的治理形式,因为国家通过生物政治的垂直传播扰乱并控制了人们的生活。本文通过分析在首次封锁期间撰写的日记,探讨了11个不同国家的学者是如何体验这一情况的。本文通过审视国家、邻里和个人这三个层面,探讨社区是否能够提供一种不同于治理的方式。虽然在国家层面,社区的概念被用来促使人们遵守非常措施,但在地方层面,通过帮助邻居展现出的社区关怀鼓励了横向联系,这种联系可以在治理的主导逻辑中提供一个“空间”。在个人社区层面,社会关系的数字化有助于在广泛分散的地区建立支持网络,但这些网络的关注点较为狭窄,而非广泛,回避了批判性讨论。