Department of Population Health, London School of Hygiene & Tropical Medicine, London, United Kingdom.
Kenya Medical Research Institute - Center for Global Health Research, Kisumu, Kenya.
PLoS One. 2023 Jun 26;18(6):e0287626. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0287626. eCollection 2023.
To compare HIV prevalence estimates from routine programme data in antenatal care (ANC) clinics in western Kenya with HIV prevalence estimates in a general population sample in the era of universal test and treat (UTT).
The study was conducted in the area covered by the Siaya Health Demographic Surveillance System (Siaya HDSS) in western Kenya and used data from ANC clinics and the general population. ANC data (n = 1,724) were collected in 2018 from 13 clinics located within the HDSS. The general population was a random sample of women of reproductive age (15-49) who reside in the Siaya HDSS and participated in an HIV sero-prevalence survey in 2018 (n = 2,019). Total and age-specific HIV prevalence estimates were produced from both datasets and demographic decomposition methods were used to quantify the contribution of the differences in age distributions and age-specific HIV prevalence to the total HIV prevalence estimates.
Total HIV prevalence was 18.0% (95% CI 16.3-19.9%) in the ANC population compared with 18.4% (95% CI 16.8-20.2%) in the general population sample. At most ages, HIV prevalence was higher in the ANC population than in the general population. The age distribution of the ANC population was younger than that of the general population, and because HIV prevalence increases with age, this reduced the total HIV prevalence among ANC attendees relative to prevalence standardised to the general population age distribution.
In the era of UTT, total HIV prevalence among ANC attendees and the general population were comparable, but age-specific HIV prevalence was higher in the ANC population in most age groups. The expansion of treatment may have led to changes in both the fertility of women living with HIV and their use of ANC services, and our results lend support to the assertion that the relationship between ANC and general population HIV prevalence estimates are highly dynamic.
比较肯尼亚西部常规产前保健(ANC)诊所的艾滋病毒流行率估计值与普遍检测和治疗(UTT)时代一般人群样本中的艾滋病毒流行率估计值。
本研究在肯尼亚西部的 Siaya 人口动态监测系统(Siaya HDSS)覆盖的地区进行,使用了 ANC 诊所和一般人群的数据。2018 年,从位于 HDSS 内的 13 个诊所收集了 1724 名 ANC 数据。一般人群是居住在 Siaya HDSS 并参加 2018 年艾滋病毒血清流行率调查的育龄妇女(15-49 岁)的随机样本(n=2019)。从两个数据集生成了总艾滋病毒流行率和年龄特异性艾滋病毒流行率估计值,并使用人口统计分解方法来量化年龄分布和年龄特异性艾滋病毒流行率差异对总艾滋病毒流行率估计值的贡献。
ANC 人群的总艾滋病毒流行率为 18.0%(95%CI 16.3-19.9%),而一般人群样本的总艾滋病毒流行率为 18.4%(95%CI 16.8-20.2%)。在大多数年龄段,ANC 人群中的艾滋病毒流行率高于一般人群。ANC 人群的年龄分布比一般人群年轻,由于艾滋病毒流行率随年龄增长而增加,这降低了 ANC 就诊者的总艾滋病毒流行率,相对于按一般人群年龄分布标准化的流行率。
在 UTT 时代,ANC 就诊者和一般人群的总艾滋病毒流行率相当,但在大多数年龄组中,ANC 人群的年龄特异性艾滋病毒流行率更高。治疗的扩大可能导致艾滋病毒感染者的生育能力和他们对 ANC 服务的使用发生变化,我们的结果支持 ANC 和一般人群艾滋病毒流行率估计之间的关系高度动态的说法。