Suppr超能文献

透明质酸寡糖与透明质酸对 DSS 诱导的小鼠结肠炎的改善作用比较及相关机制研究。

A comparative study of the ameliorative effects of hyaluronic acid oligosaccharides and hyaluronic acid on DSS-induced colitis in mice and research on relevant mechanisms.

机构信息

Department of Cardiology, Lishui District Hospital of Traditional Chinese Medicine, Nanjing 211200, China.

Affiliated Hospital of Integrated Traditional Chinese and Western Medicine, Nanjing University of Chinese Medicine, Nanjing 210028, Jiangsu Province, P.R. China.

出版信息

Food Funct. 2023 Jul 17;14(14):6482-6495. doi: 10.1039/d2fo03644d.

Abstract

As a dietary supplement, hyaluronic acid (HA) has exhibited appreciable immunomodulatory activity and an ameliorative effect on rodent colitis. However, its high viscosity is not only refractory to absorb through the gut, but also causes flatulence. In contrast to HA, hyaluronic acid oligosaccharides (o-HAs) can overcome the above-mentioned constraints, but their treatment effect still remains ill-defined contemporarily. Herein, the current study intends to compare the modulatory effects of HA and o-HA on colitis and assess the underlying molecular mechanism. We first showed that o-HA had a better preventive effect than HA in alleviating colitis symptoms, as evidenced by lower body weight loss, lower disease activity index scores, a lower inflammatory response (TNF-α, IL-6, IL-1β, p-NF-κB), and more intact colon epithelial integrity . The best efficiency was observed in the o-HA treated group with a dosage of 30 mg kg. In an barrier function assay, o-HA exerted a better protective effect on the transepithelial electrical resistance (TEER), FITC permeability, and wound healing and modulated the expression of tight junction (TJ) proteins (ZO-1, occludin) in lipopolysaccharide (LPS)-stimulated Caco-2 cells. In summary, both HA and o-HA showed the potential to reduce inflammation and ameliorate intestinal damage in DSS-induced colitis and LPS-induced inflammation, but o-HA had improved outcomes. The results also provided a glimpse of the latent mechanism by which HA and o-HA enhanced intestinal barrier function MLCK/p-MLC signaling pathway suppression.

摘要

作为膳食补充剂,透明质酸(HA)表现出相当的免疫调节活性,并对啮齿动物结肠炎具有改善作用。然而,其高粘度不仅难以通过肠道吸收,还会引起胀气。与 HA 相比,透明质酸寡糖(o-HA)可以克服上述限制,但它们的治疗效果仍不明确。在此,本研究旨在比较 HA 和 o-HA 对结肠炎的调节作用,并评估其潜在的分子机制。我们首先表明,o-HA 在缓解结肠炎症状方面比 HA 具有更好的预防作用,表现在体重减轻、疾病活动指数评分、炎症反应(TNF-α、IL-6、IL-1β、p-NF-κB)降低以及结肠上皮完整性更高。在 30mg/kg 剂量下,o-HA 的治疗效果最佳。在屏障功能测定中,o-HA 对脂多糖(LPS)刺激的 Caco-2 细胞的跨上皮电阻(TEER)、FITC 通透性、伤口愈合具有更好的保护作用,并调节紧密连接(TJ)蛋白(ZO-1、occludin)的表达。总之,HA 和 o-HA 均显示出减轻 DSS 诱导的结肠炎和 LPS 诱导的炎症中炎症和改善肠道损伤的潜力,但 o-HA 的效果更好。结果还提供了 HA 和 o-HA 增强肠道屏障功能的潜在机制的线索,即肌球蛋白轻链激酶(MLCK)/p-MLC 信号通路抑制。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验