• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

经患者同意后联系具有医学可干预遗传易感性患者的高危亲属所涉及的隐私问题:一项澳大利亚的假设性案例研究

Privacy Implications of Contacting the At-Risk Relatives of Patients with Medically Actionable Genetic Predisposition, with Patient Consent: A Hypothetical Australian Case Study.

作者信息

Tiller Jane, Nowak Kristen, Boughtwood Tiffany, Otlowski Margaret

机构信息

Australian Genomics, Parkville, VIC 3052, Australia.

Murdoch Children's Research Institute, Parkville, VIC 3052, Australia.

出版信息

BioTech (Basel). 2023 Jun 2;12(2):45. doi: 10.3390/biotech12020045.

DOI:10.3390/biotech12020045
PMID:37366793
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC10296322/
Abstract

Genetic risk information has relevance for patients' blood relatives. However, cascade testing uptake in at-risk families is <50%. International research supports direct notification of at-risk relatives by health professionals (HPs), with patient consent. However, HPs express concerns about the privacy implications of this practice. Our privacy analysis, grounded in a clinically relevant hypothetical scenario, considers the types of personal information involved in direct notification of at-risk relatives and the application of Australian privacy regulations. It finds that collecting relatives' contact details, and using those details (with patient consent) to notify relatives of possible genetic risk, does not breach Australian privacy law, providing that HPs adhere to regulatory requirements. It finds the purported "right to know" does not prevent disclosure of genetic information to at-risk relatives. Finally, the analysis confirms that the discretion available to HPs does not equate to a positive duty to warn at-risk relatives. Thus, direct notification of a patient's at-risk relatives regarding medically actionable genetic information, with patient consent, is not a breach of Australian privacy regulations, providing it is conducted in accordance with the applicable principles set out. Clinical services should consider offering this service to patients where appropriate. National guidelines would assist with the clarification of the discretion for HPs.

摘要

基因风险信息与患者的血亲相关。然而,高危家庭中进行级联检测的比例不到50%。国际研究支持在患者同意的情况下,由医疗专业人员(HPs)直接通知高危亲属。然而,医疗专业人员对这种做法的隐私影响表示担忧。我们基于一个具有临床相关性的假设情景进行的隐私分析,考虑了直接通知高危亲属所涉及的个人信息类型以及澳大利亚隐私法规的适用情况。研究发现,收集亲属的联系方式,并在患者同意的情况下使用这些信息通知亲属可能存在的基因风险,并不违反澳大利亚隐私法,前提是医疗专业人员遵守监管要求。研究发现,所谓的“知情权”并不妨碍向高危亲属披露基因信息。最后,分析证实,医疗专业人员的自由裁量权并不等同于有积极义务警告高危亲属。因此,在患者同意的情况下,直接通知患者的高危亲属有关具有医学可操作性的基因信息,只要按照规定的适用原则进行,就不违反澳大利亚隐私法规。临床服务机构应考虑在适当情况下为患者提供这项服务。国家指南将有助于明确医疗专业人员的自由裁量权范围。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/4db0/10296322/00001c9b747c/biotech-12-00045-g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/4db0/10296322/b920812eafab/biotech-12-00045-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/4db0/10296322/00001c9b747c/biotech-12-00045-g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/4db0/10296322/b920812eafab/biotech-12-00045-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/4db0/10296322/00001c9b747c/biotech-12-00045-g002.jpg

相似文献

1
Privacy Implications of Contacting the At-Risk Relatives of Patients with Medically Actionable Genetic Predisposition, with Patient Consent: A Hypothetical Australian Case Study.经患者同意后联系具有医学可干预遗传易感性患者的高危亲属所涉及的隐私问题:一项澳大利亚的假设性案例研究
BioTech (Basel). 2023 Jun 2;12(2):45. doi: 10.3390/biotech12020045.
2
Direct notification by health professionals of relatives at-risk of genetic conditions (with patient consent): views of the Australian public.卫生专业人员直接通知有遗传疾病风险的亲属(经患者同意):澳大利亚公众的看法。
Eur J Hum Genet. 2024 Jan;32(1):98-108. doi: 10.1038/s41431-023-01395-9. Epub 2023 Jun 6.
3
Disclosing genetic information to family members without consent: Five Australian case studies.未经同意向家庭成员透露遗传信息:五个澳大利亚案例研究。
Eur J Med Genet. 2020 Nov;63(11):104035. doi: 10.1016/j.ejmg.2020.104035. Epub 2020 Aug 14.
4
Disclosure to genetic relatives without consent - Australian genetic professionals' awareness of the health privacy law.未经同意向遗传亲属披露信息-澳大利亚遗传专业人员对健康隐私法的认识。
BMC Med Ethics. 2020 Feb 4;21(1):13. doi: 10.1186/s12910-020-0451-1.
5
Disclosing genetic information to at-risk relatives: new Australian privacy principles, but uniformity still elusive.向有风险的亲属披露遗传信息:新的澳大利亚隐私原则,但仍难以实现统一。
Med J Aust. 2015 Apr 6;202(6):335-7. doi: 10.5694/mja14.00670.
6
The Double Helix: Applying an Ethic of Care to the Duty to Warn Genetic Relatives of Genetic Information.《双螺旋:将关怀伦理应用于向基因亲属告知基因信息的义务》
Bioethics. 2016 Mar;30(3):181-7. doi: 10.1111/bioe.12176. Epub 2015 Jul 21.
7
Disclosure of Genetic Results to At-risk Relatives without Consent: Issues for Health Care Professionals in Australia.未经同意向高危亲属披露基因检测结果:澳大利亚医疗保健专业人员面临的问题
J Law Med. 2019 Oct;27(1):108-121.
8
What guidance does HIPAA offer to providers considering familial risk notification and cascade genetic testing?对于考虑进行家族风险通知和级联基因检测的医疗服务提供者,《健康保险流通与责任法案》提供了哪些指导?
J Law Biosci. 2020 Dec 11;7(1):lsaa071. doi: 10.1093/jlb/lsaa071. eCollection 2020 Jan-Dec.
9
American Society of Clinical Oncology policy statement update: genetic testing for cancer susceptibility.美国临床肿瘤学会政策声明更新:癌症易感性基因检测
J Clin Oncol. 2003 Jun 15;21(12):2397-406. doi: 10.1200/JCO.2003.03.189. Epub 2003 Apr 11.
10
Duty to warn at-risk relatives for genetic disease: genetic counselors' clinical experience.向有遗传疾病风险的亲属发出警告的职责:遗传咨询师的临床经验。
Am J Med Genet C Semin Med Genet. 2003 May 15;119C(1):27-34. doi: 10.1002/ajmg.c.10005.

引用本文的文献

1
Maximizing cascade genetic testing for disease prevention through direct notification of at-risk relatives.通过直接通知高危亲属,最大限度地利用级联基因检测进行疾病预防。
Nat Med. 2025 Jul 23. doi: 10.1038/s41591-025-03838-w.
2
Clinicians' discretion to contact patients' at-risk relatives about their genetic risk: new guidance from Australia's privacy regulator provides timely clarification.临床医生就患者的遗传风险联系其高危亲属的自由裁量权:澳大利亚隐私监管机构的新指南提供了及时的澄清。
Med J Aust. 2025 Aug 4;223(3):123-126. doi: 10.5694/mja2.52712. Epub 2025 Jul 13.
3
Public perspectives on healthcare professional-directed communication of hereditary genetic risks: a mixed-method systematic review.

本文引用的文献

1
Direct notification by health professionals of relatives at-risk of genetic conditions (with patient consent): views of the Australian public.卫生专业人员直接通知有遗传疾病风险的亲属(经患者同意):澳大利亚公众的看法。
Eur J Hum Genet. 2024 Jan;32(1):98-108. doi: 10.1038/s41431-023-01395-9. Epub 2023 Jun 6.
2
Cascade Testing for Hereditary Cancer Syndromes: Should We Move Toward Direct Relative Contact? A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.遗传性癌症综合征的级联检测:我们是否应该转向直系亲属接触?系统评价和荟萃分析。
J Clin Oncol. 2022 Dec 10;40(35):4129-4143. doi: 10.1200/JCO.22.00303. Epub 2022 Aug 12.
3
Cascade testing for inherited arrhythmia conditions: Experiences and attitudes of family communication approaches for a Canadian cohort.
公众对医疗保健专业人员指导下的遗传性基因风险沟通的看法:一项混合方法的系统评价
Eur J Hum Genet. 2025 Feb 3. doi: 10.1038/s41431-025-01790-4.
4
Health professionals contacting patients' relatives directly about genetic risk (with patient consent): current clinical practice and perspectives.在获得患者同意的情况下,医疗专业人员直接联系患者亲属告知基因风险:当前临床实践与观点。
Eur J Hum Genet. 2025 Apr;33(4):476-484. doi: 10.1038/s41431-024-01730-8. Epub 2024 Dec 19.
5
Direct notification by health professionals of relatives at-risk of genetic conditions (with patient consent): views of the Australian public.卫生专业人员直接通知有遗传疾病风险的亲属(经患者同意):澳大利亚公众的看法。
Eur J Hum Genet. 2024 Jan;32(1):98-108. doi: 10.1038/s41431-023-01395-9. Epub 2023 Jun 6.
级联检测遗传性心律失常疾病:加拿大队列的家族沟通方法的经验和态度。
J Genet Couns. 2022 Jun;31(3):815-828. doi: 10.1002/jgc4.1550. Epub 2022 Jan 14.
4
A tailored approach to informing relatives at risk of inherited cardiac conditions: results of a randomised controlled trial.针对遗传性心脏疾病风险亲属的定制告知方法:一项随机对照试验的结果。
Eur J Hum Genet. 2022 Feb;30(2):203-210. doi: 10.1038/s41431-021-00993-9. Epub 2021 Nov 24.
5
Patient and Family Preferences on Health System-Led Direct Contact for Cascade Screening.患者及家属对卫生系统主导的级联筛查直接接触的偏好。
J Pers Med. 2021 Jun 10;11(6):538. doi: 10.3390/jpm11060538.
6
Ethical and practical implications of returning genetic research results: two Australian case studies.
Med J Aust. 2021 Apr;214(6):259-262.e1. doi: 10.5694/mja2.50842. Epub 2020 Nov 8.
7
Barriers and facilitators for cascade testing in genetic conditions: a systematic review.遗传疾病级联检测的障碍和促进因素:系统评价。
Eur J Hum Genet. 2020 Dec;28(12):1631-1644. doi: 10.1038/s41431-020-00725-5. Epub 2020 Sep 18.
8
Disclosing genetic information to family members without consent: Five Australian case studies.未经同意向家庭成员透露遗传信息:五个澳大利亚案例研究。
Eur J Med Genet. 2020 Nov;63(11):104035. doi: 10.1016/j.ejmg.2020.104035. Epub 2020 Aug 14.
9
Prospective Feasibility Trial of a Novel Strategy of Facilitated Cascade Genetic Testing Using Telephone Counseling.利用电话咨询促进级联基因检测的新策略的前瞻性可行性试验。
J Clin Oncol. 2020 May 1;38(13):1389-1397. doi: 10.1200/JCO.19.02005. Epub 2020 Jan 10.
10
How to inform at-risk relatives? Attitudes of 1379 Dutch patients, relatives, and members of the general population.如何告知高危亲属?1379 名荷兰患者、亲属和普通民众的态度。
J Genet Couns. 2020 Oct;29(5):786-799. doi: 10.1002/jgc4.1206. Epub 2019 Dec 30.