University of Trás-os-Montes and Alto Douro, Quinta dos Prados, Vila Real, Portugal.
Centro Hospitalar de Trás-os-Montes e Alto Douro, E.P.E., Vila Real, Portugal.
In Vivo. 2023 Jul-Aug;37(4):1498-1503. doi: 10.21873/invivo.13234.
BACKGROUND/AIM: Hepatitis C virus (HCV) core antigen (Ag) test has been increasingly applied as an effective alternative to conventional molecular tests allowing rapid and affordable diagnosis, which is of paramount relevance to achieve global elimination of HCV infection.
ARCHITECT HCV Ag test was evaluated in comparison with HCV RNA quantification test (CAP/CTM) to calculate its sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value (PPV), negative predictive value (NPV) and to determine their correlation level. Its performance, according to low and high viral load values and in different treatment stages [during treatment (T), at the end of the therapeutic protocol (EOT) and when sustained virological response (SVR) was evaluated].
In total, 145 samples were included. Considering CAP/CTM, the sensitivity, specificity, PPV and NPV of the HCV-Ag test were 88.9%, 99.1%, 97.0% and 96.4%, respectively, and the correlation among tests was high (r=0.890), with only five discordant results. A decrease in sensitivity was found for low viral load values (<1,000 IU/ml), but the opposite was verified for high viral concentrations (≥1,000 IU/ml). A good agreement was verified for the T and EOT groups (k=0.789 and k=0.638) and an excellent agreement in the SVR group (k=1.000).
HCV-Ag seems to be an effective alternative that can be routinely combined with other faster and more accessible tests (e.g., HCV antibody tests) for the identification of new HCV infections in suspected patients, eventually reserving the molecular techniques for samples with discordant results.
背景/目的:丙型肝炎病毒 (HCV) 核心抗原 (Ag) 检测已越来越多地被用作替代传统分子检测的有效方法,可实现快速且经济实惠的诊断,这对于实现全球消除 HCV 感染至关重要。
ARCHITECT HCV Ag 检测与 HCV RNA 定量检测 (CAP/CTM) 进行比较,以计算其灵敏度、特异性、阳性预测值 (PPV)、阴性预测值 (NPV),并确定它们的相关水平。根据低病毒载量和高病毒载量值以及不同治疗阶段[治疗期间 (T)、治疗方案结束时 (EOT) 和持续病毒学应答 (SVR)时]评估其性能。
共纳入 145 例样本。考虑到 CAP/CTM,HCV-Ag 检测的灵敏度、特异性、PPV 和 NPV 分别为 88.9%、99.1%、97.0%和 96.4%,且两种检测方法相关性高(r=0.890),仅存在 5 个不一致的结果。对于低病毒载量值(<1,000 IU/ml),灵敏度降低,但对于高病毒浓度(≥1,000 IU/ml)则相反。在 T 组和 EOT 组中,一致性较好(k=0.789 和 k=0.638),在 SVR 组中,一致性极好(k=1.000)。
HCV-Ag 似乎是一种有效的替代方法,可以与其他更快、更易于获得的检测方法(例如 HCV 抗体检测)常规联合使用,以识别疑似患者中的新 HCV 感染,最终将分子技术保留用于存在不一致结果的样本。