Department of Neurosurgery, Tri-Service General Hospital, National Defense Medical Center, Taipei, Taiwan, R.O.C.
Institute of Medical Sciences, Tzu Chi University, Hualien, Taiwan, R.O.C.
In Vivo. 2023 Jul-Aug;37(4):1838-1846. doi: 10.21873/invivo.13275.
BACKGROUND/AIM: To investigate the radiographic and clinical outcomes in patients diagnosed with multilevel lumbar spine degeneration, undergoing hybrid stabilization with an interspinous device (IPD) adjacent to spine fusion, as compared with those experiencing three-segment or two-segment transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion (TLIF) via minimally invasive surgery (MIS).
Between 2015-2017, 51 consecutive patients who received three-segment TLIF, interspinous dynamic stabilization combined with two-segment TLIF (topping-off surgery), and two-segment TLIF coupled with adjacent level lumbar discectomy (two-segment TLIF+discectomy) were studied. These three operative procedures were performed by one neurosurgeon at the same hospital. Post-operative analysis of the two-year analysis was conducted by another neurosurgeon. Radiographic and clinical outcomes were compared among the three groups.
Duration of surgery was significantly shorter in the topping-off surgery and TLIF+discectomy compared to three-segment TLIF group. Although there was no difference in hospital stay among the three groups, visual analogue scale (VAS) and Oswestry disability index (ODI) were less in the topping-off group than in the three-segment TLIF or two-segment TLIF+discectomy groups after one week and three months follow-up, respectively. Disc high index (DHI) in adjacent segment decreased from before the operation to two years follow-up postoperatively in the two-segment TLIF+discectomy group. In contrast, DHI in the segment adjacent to spondylolisthesis increased from before the operation to last follow-up post-operatively in the three-segment TLIF group. Compared with the two-segment TLIF+discectomy group, the topping-off group showed higher foramen high index at the IPD level. While there was no difference in segment range of motion among the three groups, the topping-off group showed preserved total range of motion at a two-year follow-up, as compared with the three-segment TLIF group.
Under strict indications, topping-off surgery is an acceptable alternative to fusion surgery for spondylolisthesis combined with adjacent disc degeneration.
背景/目的:本研究旨在对比分析接受后路融合术相邻节段脊柱融合(TLIF)、后路融合术相邻节段 TLIF 附加 2 个节段经皮椎间孔腰椎间融合术(TLIF)、后路融合术相邻节段 TLIF 附加 1 个节段融合术(加钉术)治疗多节段腰椎退变性疾病患者的影像学和临床疗效。
本研究回顾性分析 2015 年至 2017 年在我院接受上述 3 种手术的 51 例患者的临床资料。术后 2 年,由另一名神经外科医生进行影像学和临床疗效评估。比较 3 组患者的手术时间、术中出血量、住院时间、影像学参数(邻近节段椎间盘高度指数 DHI、椎间孔高度指数)、临床疗效(视觉模拟评分 VAS、Oswestry 功能障碍指数 ODI)。
与 3 节段 TLIF 组相比,加钉术和 TLIF+椎间盘切除术的手术时间更短,而住院时间无明显差异。与 3 节段 TLIF 组或 2 节段 TLIF+椎间盘切除术组相比,加钉术组术后 1 周和 3 个月的 VAS 和 ODI 评分更低,而 2 节段 TLIF+椎间盘切除术组术后相邻节段 DHI 逐渐降低。2 节段 TLIF+椎间盘切除术组术后邻近滑脱节段的 DHI 逐渐增加,而 3 节段 TLIF 组术后邻近 TLIF 节段的 DHI 逐渐增加。与 2 节段 TLIF+椎间盘切除术组相比,加钉术组 IPD 水平的椎间孔高度指数更高。3 组患者的节段活动度无明显差异,加钉术组在术后 2 年时总活动度保持更好。
对于存在明确适应证的患者,加钉术是一种可替代融合手术治疗退变性腰椎疾病合并邻近节段椎间盘退变的方法。