Muntean Paul, Popa Anca, Miclos-Balica Monica, Schick Falk, Munteanu Oana, Pupazan Vasile, Neagu Adrian, Neagu Monica
Department of Functional Sciences, "Victor Babeș" University of Medicine and Pharmacy of Timișoara, 300041 Timisoara, Romania.
Center for Modeling Biological Systems and Data Analysis, "Victor Babeș" University of Medicine and Pharmacy of Timisoara, 300041 Timisoara, Romania.
Life (Basel). 2023 Jun 2;13(6):1315. doi: 10.3390/life13061315.
Air displacement plethysmography (ADP) is a widespread technique for assessing global obesity in both health and disease. The reliability of ADP has been demonstrated by studies focused on duplicate trials. The present study was purported to evaluate learning effects on the reliability of body composition assessment using the BOD POD system, the sole commercially available ADP instrument. To this end, quadruplicate trials were performed on a group of 105 subjects (51 women and 54 men). We estimated measurement error from pairs of consecutive trials-(1,2), (2,3), and (3,4)-to test the hypothesis that early measurements are subject to larger errors. Indeed, statistical analysis revealed that measures of reliability inferred from the first two trials were inferior to those computed for the other pairs of contiguous trials: for percent body fat (%BF), the standard error of measurement (SEM) was 1.04% for pair (1,2), 0.71% for pair (2,3), and 0.66% for pair (3,4); the two-way random effects model intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC) was 0.991 for pair (1,2), and 0.996 for pairs (2,3) and (3,4). Our findings suggest that, at least for novice subjects, the first ADP test should be regarded as a practice trial. When the remaining trials were pooled together, the reliability indices of single ADP tests were the following: ICC = 0.996, SEM = 0.70%, and minimum detectable change (MDC) = 1.93% for %BF, and ICC = 0.999, SEM = 0.49 kg, and MDC = 1.35 kg for fat-free mass (FFM). Thus, the present study pleads for eliminating learning effects to further increase the reliability of ADP.
空气置换体积描记法(ADP)是一种广泛应用于评估健康和疾病状态下总体肥胖情况的技术。专注于重复试验的研究已证明了ADP的可靠性。本研究旨在评估使用BOD POD系统(唯一可商购的ADP仪器)对身体成分评估可靠性的学习效应。为此,对一组105名受试者(51名女性和54名男性)进行了四次重复试验。我们通过连续试验对(1,2)、(2,3)和(3,4)来估计测量误差,以检验早期测量误差更大这一假设。事实上,统计分析表明,从前两次试验推断出的可靠性测量结果不如其他相邻试验对计算出的结果:对于体脂百分比(%BF),(1,2)对的测量标准误差(SEM)为1.04%,(2,3)对为0.71%,(3,4)对为0.66%;(1,2)对的双向随机效应模型组内相关系数(ICC)为0.991,(2,3)对和(3,4)对为0.996。我们的研究结果表明,至少对于新手受试者,首次ADP测试应被视为一次练习试验。当将其余试验合并在一起时,单次ADP测试的可靠性指标如下:%BF的ICC = 0.996,SEM = 0.70%,最小可检测变化(MDC) = 1.93%;无脂肪质量(FFM)的ICC = 0.999,SEM = 0.49 kg,MDC = 1.35 kg。因此,本研究主张消除学习效应以进一步提高ADP的可靠性。