Khan Hizbullah, Sirajuddin Muhammad, Badshah Amin, Ahmad Sajjad, Bilal Muhammad, Salman Syed Muhammad, Butler Ian S, Wani Tanveer A, Zargar Seema
Department of Chemistry, University of Science and Technology, Bannu 28100, Pakistan.
Department of Chemistry, Quaid-i-Azam University, Islamabad 45320, Pakistan.
Pharmaceuticals (Basel). 2023 May 29;16(6):806. doi: 10.3390/ph16060806.
One homoleptic () and three heteroleptic (-) palladium(II) complexes were synthesized and characterized by various physicochemical techniques, i.e., elemental analysis, FTIR, Raman spectroscopy, H, C, and P NMR. Compound was also confirmed by single crystal XRD, showing a slightly distorted square planar geometry. The antibacterial results obtained via the agar-well diffusion method for compound were maximum among the screen compounds. All the compounds have shown good to significant antibacterial results against the tested bacterial strains, and except against . Similarly, the molecular docking study of compound has shown the best affinity with binding energy scores of -8.6569, -6.5716, and -7.6966 kcal/mol against and , respectively. Compound has exhibited the highest activity (3.67 µM), followed by compound (4.57 µM), (6.94 µM), and (21.7 µM) against the DU145 human prostate cancer cell line using the sulforhodamine B (SRB) method as compared to cisplatin (>200 µM). The highest docking score was obtained for compounds (-7.5148 kcal/mol) and (-7.0343 kcal/mol). Compound shows that the Cl atom of the compound acts as a chain side acceptor for the DR5 receptor residue and the pyridine ring is involved in interaction with the residue via arene-H, while Compound interacts with the residue via the Cl atom. The physicochemical parameters determined by the SwissADME webserver revealed that no blood-brain barrier (BBB) permeation is predicted for all four compounds, while gastrointestinal absorption is low for compound and high for the rest of the compounds (-). As concluding remarks based on the obtained in vitro biological results, the evaluated compounds after in vivo studies might be a good choice for future antibiotics and anticancer agents.
合成了一种均配型( )和三种杂配型( - )钯(II)配合物,并通过各种物理化学技术进行了表征,即元素分析、傅里叶变换红外光谱(FTIR)、拉曼光谱、氢谱、碳谱和磷谱核磁共振。化合物 也通过单晶X射线衍射(XRD)得到证实,显示出略微扭曲的平面正方形几何结构。通过琼脂孔扩散法对化合物 获得的抗菌结果在筛选的化合物中是最高的。所有化合物对测试的细菌菌株均显示出良好到显著的抗菌结果,除了 对 没有效果。同样,化合物 的分子对接研究表明,其对 和 的结合能得分分别为 -8.6569、-6.5716和 -7.6966 kcal/mol,具有最佳亲和力。与顺铂(>200 µM)相比,使用磺酰罗丹明B(SRB)法,化合物 对DU145人前列腺癌细胞系表现出最高活性(3.67 µM),其次是化合物 (4.57 µM)、 (6.94 µM)和 (21.7 µM)。化合物 和 获得了最高对接分数(分别为 -7.5148 kcal/mol和 -7.0343 kcal/mol)。化合物 表明该化合物的氯原子作为DR5受体残基 的链侧受体,吡啶环通过芳烃 - 氢与 残基相互作用,而化合物 通过氯原子与 残基相互作用。瑞士ADME网络服务器测定的物理化学参数表明,预测所有四种化合物均无血脑屏障(BBB)渗透,而化合物 的胃肠道吸收较低,其余化合物( - )的胃肠道吸收较高。作为基于所获得的体外生物学结果的总结,经过体内研究后,所评估的化合物可能是未来抗生素和抗癌药物的良好选择。