Li Tenglong, Wang Zilong, He Shuyue, Chen Ying
Wisdom Lake Academy of Pharmacy, Xi'an Jiaotong-Liverpool University, Suzhou 215123, China.
Department of Financial and Actuarial Mathematics, Xi'an Jiaotong-Liverpool University, Suzhou 215123, China.
Vaccines (Basel). 2023 Jun 9;11(6):1078. doi: 10.3390/vaccines11061078.
Vaccination campaigns have been rolled out in most countries to increase vaccination coverage and protect against case mortality during the ongoing pandemic. To evaluate the effectiveness of COVID-19 vaccination, it is vital to disentangle the herd effect from the marginal effect and parameterize them separately in a model. To demonstrate this, we study the relationship between the COVID-19 vaccination coverage and case fatality rate (CFR) based on U.S. vaccination coverage at county level, with daily records from 11 March 2021 to 26 January 2022 for 3109 U.S. counties. Using segmented regression, we discovered three breakpoints of the vaccination coverage, at which herd effects could potentially exist. Controlling for county heterogeneity, we found the size of the marginal effect was not constant but actually increased as the vaccination coverage increased, and only the herd effect at the first breakpoint to be statistically significant, which implied an indirect benefit of vaccination may exist at the early stage of a vaccination campaign. Our results demonstrated that public-health researchers should carefully differentiate and quantify the herd and marginal effects when analyzing vaccination data, to better inform vaccination-campaign strategies as well as evaluate vaccination effectiveness.
大多数国家已开展疫苗接种运动,以提高疫苗接种覆盖率,并在当前的疫情期间预防病例死亡。为了评估新冠疫苗接种的有效性,区分群体效应和边际效应并在模型中分别对它们进行参数化至关重要。为了证明这一点,我们基于美国县级疫苗接种覆盖率,研究新冠疫苗接种覆盖率与病死率(CFR)之间的关系,数据来自2021年3月11日至2022年1月26日美国3109个县的每日记录。通过分段回归,我们发现了疫苗接种覆盖率的三个断点,在这些断点处可能存在群体效应。在控制县的异质性后,我们发现边际效应的大小并非恒定不变,而是实际上随着疫苗接种覆盖率的增加而增加,并且只有第一个断点处的群体效应具有统计学意义,这意味着在疫苗接种运动的早期阶段可能存在疫苗接种的间接益处。我们的结果表明,公共卫生研究人员在分析疫苗接种数据时应仔细区分和量化群体效应和边际效应,以便更好地为疫苗接种运动策略提供信息并评估疫苗接种效果。