Suppr超能文献

一种新型电脑化隐斜视测试的精度和可靠性评估

Assessment of precision and reliability of a novel computerized heterophoria test.

作者信息

Wang Yuwen, Zheng Fuhao, Zhou Fengchao, Song E

机构信息

Department of Ophthalmology, the Second Affiliated Hospital of Soochow University, Suzhou, Jiangsu, China.

Eye Hospital and School of Ophthalmology and Optometry, Wenzhou Medical University, Wenzhou, Zhejiang, China.

出版信息

Front Neurosci. 2023 Jun 12;17:1207945. doi: 10.3389/fnins.2023.1207945. eCollection 2023.

Abstract

PURPOSE

To assess the precision and reliability of a novel computerized heterophoria test (CHT).

METHODS

One hundred and three subjects aged 20 to 48 (27.37 ± 5.15) were recruited from Wenzhou Medical University. All subjects with corrected spectacles were examined with CHT and a prism-neutralized objective cover test (POCT) in a randomized order. They were then re-examined with CHT within 1 week. Their heterophoria was measured at three different distances (3 m, 0.77 m and 0.4 m); the average was recorded after three consecutive measurements. Inter-examiner repeatability, intra-examiner repeatability of CHT and agreement between CHT and POCT were evaluated.

RESULTS

There was no significant difference among repeated measurements using CHT (all  > 0.05). The difference between POCT and CHT was statistically significant at three distances (all  < 0.001). However, the mean absolute difference was 1.20, 1.93, and 2.41, all of which were significantly smaller than the permissible range of error (4) at three different distances (all  < 0.001).

CONCLUSION

The CHT demonstrated excellent inter- and intra-examiner repeatability, as well as good correlation with POCT. The differences between CHT and POCT were within the permissible range of error, indicating that CHT could provide a precise and reliable measurement for clinical applications.

摘要

目的

评估一种新型电脑化隐斜视测试(CHT)的精度和可靠性。

方法

从温州医科大学招募了103名年龄在20至48岁(27.37±5.15)之间的受试者。所有佩戴矫正眼镜的受试者均以随机顺序接受CHT和棱镜中和客观遮盖试验(POCT)检查。然后在1周内对他们进行CHT复查。在三个不同距离(3米、0.77米和0.4米)测量他们的隐斜视;连续测量三次后记录平均值。评估了CHT的检查者间重复性、检查者内重复性以及CHT与POCT之间的一致性。

结果

使用CHT进行的重复测量之间无显著差异(均>0.05)。POCT与CHT在三个距离处的差异具有统计学意义(均<0.001)。然而,平均绝对差异分别为1.20、1.93和2.41,在三个不同距离处均显著小于允许误差范围(4)(均<0.001)。

结论

CHT表现出出色的检查者间和检查者内重复性,以及与POCT的良好相关性。CHT与POCT之间的差异在允许误差范围内,表明CHT可为临床应用提供精确可靠的数据。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/a2b2/10291043/0ec8f5c3a975/fnins-17-1207945-g001.jpg

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验