Department of Psychiatry and Behavioral Neuroscience, University of Cincinnati College of Medicine, Cincinnati, OH, USA.
Department of Psychiatry and Behavioral Neuroscience, University of Cincinnati College of Medicine, Cincinnati, OH, USA.
J Affect Disord. 2023 Oct 15;339:43-51. doi: 10.1016/j.jad.2023.06.030. Epub 2023 Jun 26.
Evaluate differences in sustained attention (SAT) and associated neurofunctional profiles between bipolar disorder type I (BD), attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder (ADHD), and healthy comparison (HC) youth.
Adolescent participants, aged 12-17 years, with BD (n = 30) and ADHD (n = 28) and HC adolescents (n = 26) underwent structural and functional magnetic resonance imaging (fMRI) while completing a modified Continuous Performance Task-Identical Pairs task. Attentional load was modifying in this task using three levels of image distortion (0 %, 25 % and 50 % image distortion). Task related fMRI activation and performance measures: perceptual sensitivity index (PSI); response bias (RB) and response time (RT); were calculated and compared between groups.
BD participants displayed lower perceptual sensitivity index (0 % p = 0.012; 25 % p = 0.015; 50 % p = 0.036) and higher values of response bias across levels of distortion (0 % p = 0.002, 25 % p = 0.001, and 50 % p = 0.008) as compared to HC. No statistically significant differences were observed for PSI and RB between BD and ADHD groups. No difference in RT were detected. Between-group and within-group differences in task related fMRI measures were detected in several clusters. In a region of interest (ROI) analysis of these clusters comparing BD and ADHD confirmed differences between these two groups.
Compared with HC, BD participants displayed SAT deficits. Increased attentional load revealed that BD participants had lower activation in brain regions associated with performance and integration of neural processes in SAT. ROI analysis between BD and ADHD participants shows that the differences were likely not attributable to ADHD comorbidity, suggesting SAT deficits were distinct to the BD group.
评估 1 型双相情感障碍(BD)、注意缺陷多动障碍(ADHD)和健康对照组(HC)青少年在持续性注意力(SAT)和相关神经功能特征方面的差异。
12-17 岁的青少年参与者,患有 BD(n=30)和 ADHD(n=28)和 HC 青少年(n=26)在完成改良连续绩效任务-相同对任务时接受了结构和功能磁共振成像(fMRI)。在这个任务中,使用三个级别的图像失真(0%、25%和 50%的图像失真)来调整注意力负荷。计算并比较了组间任务相关 fMRI 激活和表现指标:感知灵敏度指数(PSI);反应偏差(RB)和反应时间(RT)。
BD 参与者在感知灵敏度指数(0% p=0.012;25% p=0.015;50% p=0.036)和在各个失真水平的反应偏差值(0% p=0.002,25% p=0.001 和 50% p=0.008)方面显示出较低的 PSI 和较高的 RB,与 HC 相比。BD 和 ADHD 组之间 PSI 和 RB 无统计学差异。未检测到 RT 的差异。在几个聚类中检测到任务相关 fMRI 测量的组间和组内差异。在这些聚类的感兴趣区域(ROI)分析中,BD 和 ADHD 之间的比较证实了这两组之间的差异。
与 HC 相比,BD 参与者表现出 SAT 缺陷。增加注意力负荷表明,BD 参与者在与 SAT 中表现和神经过程整合相关的大脑区域的激活较低。BD 和 ADHD 参与者之间的 ROI 分析表明,这些差异不太可能归因于 ADHD 共病,这表明 SAT 缺陷与 BD 组有明显的不同。