Scheid P, Hook C, Piiper J
Respir Physiol. 1986 Jun;64(3):365-74. doi: 10.1016/0034-5687(86)90129-5.
The validity of previously used simplified models for the analysis of gas transfer in fish gills was tested using an integrated model which includes water flow and blood flow in counter-current arrangement. The model accounts for the resistance to diffusion of O2 both in the water-blood barrier and in the interlamellar water, which is assumed to flow with a parabolic velocity profile between the secondary lamellae. The O2 diffusing capacity (transfer factor) for this model (Dint) was compared to that (Dm + w) calculated from the diffusing capacity of the water-blood barrier (Dm), and from the effective diffusive conductance of the parabolically streaming interlamellar water (Dw) as 1/Dm + w = 1/Dm + 1/Dw. These diffusing capacities were compared with that (Dadd) calculated from Dm and diffusing capacity of a water layer of 1/4 thickness of the interlamellar space (Dw) as 1/Dadd = 1/Dm + 1/Dw. Calculations with morphometric and gas exchange parameters in the elasmobranch Scyliorhinus stellaris reveal the following features: (1) In physiological conditions, Dm + w and Dint are similar to within 10%, but Dint is always higher. (2) Dint and Dm + w increase with increasing ventilation; Dint increases with decreasing perfusion, while Dm + w remains constant. (3) Both Dint and Dm + w agree reasonably well with Dadd. In other anatomical and physiological conditions, particularly for relatively high Dm, Dw, and Dw and high ventilation, greater discrepancies between Dint and Dm + w may occur but Dm + w appears to represent a reasonable approximation of the effective O2 diffusing capacity, which is best modelled as Dint.
利用一个包含逆流排列的水流和血流的综合模型,对先前用于分析鱼鳃气体交换的简化模型的有效性进行了测试。该模型考虑了氧气在水-血屏障和板间水中扩散的阻力,假定板间水在次生鳃小片之间以抛物线速度分布流动。将该模型的氧气扩散能力(传递因子)(Dint)与根据水-血屏障的扩散能力(Dm)和抛物线流动的板间水的有效扩散传导率(Dw)计算得出的扩散能力(Dm + w)进行比较,计算方式为1/Dm + w = 1/Dm + 1/Dw。将这些扩散能力与根据Dm和板间空间1/4厚度水层的扩散能力(Dw)计算得出的扩散能力(Dadd)进行比较,计算方式为1/Dadd = 1/Dm + 1/Dw。对板鳃亚纲鱼类星鲨的形态测量和气体交换参数进行计算,得出以下特征:(1)在生理条件下,Dm + w和Dint相似,相差在10%以内,但Dint总是更高。(2)Dint和Dm + w随通气增加而增加;Dint随灌注减少而增加,而Dm + w保持不变。(3)Dint和Dm + w与Dadd都相当吻合。在其他解剖和生理条件下,特别是对于相对较高的Dm、Dw以及高通气情况,Dint和Dm + w之间可能会出现更大差异,但Dm + w似乎是有效氧气扩散能力的合理近似值,而将其最好建模为Dint。