• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

基于 2018 年至 2022 年护理 MOOC 数据的回顾性研究:通过潜在类别分析对 MOOC 学习者的参与和表现进行分析。

Analysis of participation and performance of MOOC learners via latent class analysis: A retrospective study based on the data of a nursing MOOC from 2018 to 2022.

机构信息

School of Nursing, Sun Yat-sen University, Guangzhou, China.

The Third Affiliated Hospital of Sun Yat-sen University, Guangzhou, China.

出版信息

Nurse Educ Today. 2023 Sep;128:105888. doi: 10.1016/j.nedt.2023.105888. Epub 2023 Jun 21.

DOI:10.1016/j.nedt.2023.105888
PMID:37385148
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Although massive open online courses have been widely used in nurse education, few studies have evaluated MOOC learner behavioral characteristics. Understanding MOOC learners' participation and performance parameters is helpful for further development and administration of this educational approach.

OBJECTIVES

To categorize nursing MOOC learners according to their different learning participation and to compare the differences in learning performance of different types of MOOC learners.

DESIGN

Retrospective.

SETTINGS AND PARTICIPANTS

Participants evaluated in this study were learners of the Health Assessment MOOC on a Chinese MOOC platform for nine semesters from 2018 to 2022.

METHODS

Via latent class analysis, MOOC learners were categorized according to the number of times they participated in each topic test and the final exam. Differences in scores of each topic test and the final exam, case discussion number, and total evaluation score among different learners were compared.

RESULTS

Using latent class analysis, MOOC learners were categorized as committed (28.96 %), negative (16.08 %), mid-term dropout (12.78 %) and early dropout (42.18 %) learners. Committed learners performed best and no significant difference were found among other learner types on most topic tests and the final exam. Committed learners participated in case discussions most actively. According to total evaluations, committed, mid-term dropout, early dropout, and negative learners performed from best to worst.

CONCLUSION

Health Assessment MOOC learners were categorized using five-years of data. Committed learners performed best. No significant difference in performance was found for other learners on most topic tests and the final exam. Understanding learner characteristics and educational behavior is critical for effective design and administration of future MOOC learning approaches.

摘要

背景

尽管大规模在线开放课程已广泛应用于护理教育,但鲜有研究评估 MOOC 学习者的行为特征。了解 MOOC 学习者的参与度和表现参数有助于进一步发展和管理这种教育方法。

目的

根据不同的学习参与度对护理 MOOC 学习者进行分类,并比较不同类型 MOOC 学习者的学习表现差异。

设计

回顾性研究。

设置和参与者

本研究评估的参与者是 2018 年至 2022 年九个学期在一个中国 MOOC 平台上学习健康评估 MOOC 的学习者。

方法

通过潜在类别分析,根据学习者参与每个主题测验和期末考试的次数对 MOOC 学习者进行分类。比较不同学习者在每次主题测验和期末考试中的得分、案例讨论次数和总评分数的差异。

结果

使用潜在类别分析,MOOC 学习者分为四类:投入型(28.96%)、消极型(16.08%)、中期辍学型(12.78%)和早期辍学型(42.18%)。投入型学习者表现最佳,其他类型学习者在大多数主题测验和期末考试中的表现无显著差异。投入型学习者最积极地参与案例讨论。根据总评分数,投入型、中期辍学型、早期辍学型和消极型学习者的表现从好到差。

结论

利用五年的数据对健康评估 MOOC 学习者进行分类。投入型学习者表现最佳。其他类型学习者在大多数主题测验和期末考试中的表现无显著差异。了解学习者的特征和教育行为对于未来 MOOC 学习方法的有效设计和管理至关重要。

相似文献

1
Analysis of participation and performance of MOOC learners via latent class analysis: A retrospective study based on the data of a nursing MOOC from 2018 to 2022.基于 2018 年至 2022 年护理 MOOC 数据的回顾性研究:通过潜在类别分析对 MOOC 学习者的参与和表现进行分析。
Nurse Educ Today. 2023 Sep;128:105888. doi: 10.1016/j.nedt.2023.105888. Epub 2023 Jun 21.
2
Who can benefit more from massive open online courses? A prospective cohort study.谁能从大规模开放在线课程中获益更多?一项前瞻性队列研究。
Nurse Educ Today. 2019 May;76:96-102. doi: 10.1016/j.nedt.2019.02.004. Epub 2019 Feb 12.
3
Benefits of Massive Open Online Course Participation: Deductive Thematic Analysis.大规模在线开放课程参与的益处:演绎主题分析。
J Med Internet Res. 2020 Jul 8;22(7):e17318. doi: 10.2196/17318.
4
Data Collection Approaches to Enable Evaluation of a Massive Open Online Course About Data Science for Continuing Education in Health Care: Case Study.用于评估一门关于医疗保健继续教育的数据科学大规模开放在线课程的数据收集方法:案例研究
JMIR Med Educ. 2019 Apr 2;5(1):e10982. doi: 10.2196/10982.
5
Equipping Learners to Evaluate Online Health Care Resources: Longitudinal Study of Learning Design Strategies in a Health Care Massive Open Online Course.让学习者具备评估在线医疗资源的能力:对一门医疗大规模开放在线课程中学习设计策略的纵向研究。
J Med Internet Res. 2020 Feb 26;22(2):e15177. doi: 10.2196/15177.
6
Protocol for a mixed-methods evaluation of a massive open online course on real world evidence.关于大规模在线开放课程中真实世界证据的混合方法评估方案。
BMJ Open. 2018 Aug 13;8(8):e025188. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2018-025188.
7
Enhancing Learner Participation in Online Discussion Forums in Massive Open Online Courses: The Role of Mandatory Participation.提高大规模在线开放课程中学习者在在线讨论论坛中的参与度:强制参与的作用。
Front Psychol. 2022 Apr 15;13:819640. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2022.819640. eCollection 2022.
8
Self-regulated learning strategies in world's first MOOC in implant dentistry.世界首个种植体牙科领域 MOOC 中的自我调节学习策略。
Eur J Dent Educ. 2019 Aug;23(3):278-285. doi: 10.1111/eje.12428. Epub 2019 Feb 22.
9
Accelerating digital health literacy for the treatment of growth disorders: The impact of a massive open online course.加速数字健康素养以治疗生长障碍:大规模在线开放课程的影响。
Front Public Health. 2023 Apr 18;11:1043584. doi: 10.3389/fpubh.2023.1043584. eCollection 2023.
10
Using Learner Reviews to Inform Instructional Video Design in MOOCs.利用学习者评论为慕课中的教学视频设计提供参考。
Behav Sci (Basel). 2023 Apr 13;13(4):330. doi: 10.3390/bs13040330.

引用本文的文献

1
Effectiveness of a Learning Pathway on Food and Nutrition in Amyotrophic Lateral Sclerosis.肌萎缩侧索硬化症患者食物与营养学习路径的有效性
Nutrients. 2025 Aug 6;17(15):2562. doi: 10.3390/nu17152562.
2
Nursing postgraduates' innovative behaviour, influencing factors and educational requirements: a national cross-sectional study.护理研究生的创新行为、影响因素及教育需求:一项全国性横断面研究。
BMC Med Educ. 2025 Jan 18;25(1):89. doi: 10.1186/s12909-025-06658-1.