Suppr超能文献

近端深静脉阻塞支架置入术后的长期随访、再次干预原因及监测后果

Long Term Follow Up, Causes for Re-intervention, and Consequences for Surveillance After Stenting for Proximal Deep Vein Obstruction.

作者信息

Bakas Jay M, Moelker Adriaan, van Montfrans Catherine, Kruip Marieke, Verhagen Hence J M, van Rijn Marie Josee E

机构信息

Department of Vascular and Endovascular Surgery, Erasmus University Medical Centre, Rotterdam, The Netherlands.

Department of Radiology and Nuclear Medicine, Erasmus University Medical Centre, Rotterdam, The Netherlands.

出版信息

Eur J Vasc Endovasc Surg. 2023 Sep;66(3):389-396. doi: 10.1016/j.ejvs.2023.06.033. Epub 2023 Jun 28.

Abstract

OBJECTIVE

Venous stenting is performed increasingly for acute deep vein thrombosis (DVT) and post-thrombotic syndrome (PTS) with good short term patency results, but long term data are scarce. The purpose of this study was to evaluate long term outcome of stenting for acute DVT and PTS and to study causes of re-intervention.

METHODS

All patients stented for acute DVT and PTS between May 2006 and November 2021 were included retrospectively in this single centre cohort study. Patency was studied by duplex ultrasound (DUS) or computed tomography. The primary endpoint was stent patency. Re-intervention free survival was calculated using Kaplan-Meier methods. Secondary endpoints were causes of re-intervention, using the Pouncey classification system (2022). Binary logistic regression was used to calculate odds ratios for predictors of re-intervention.

RESULTS

A total of 114 patients were included, with 129 limbs involved (acute DVT n = 53; 41%), PTS n = 76; 59%). Median follow up was 2.3 years (interquartile range [IQR] 2.3) for acute DVT and 5.2 years (IQR 7.1) for PTS. Primary patency, secondary patency, and permanent occlusion were 73.5%, 98.1%, and 1.9% for acute DVT, and 63.2%, 92.1%, and 7.9% for PTS limbs. Overall, 41 limbs underwent at least one re-intervention: 14 in the acute DVT group and 27 for PTS. Most re-interventions (82.9%) were performed within the first year after stenting. Missed inflow, insufficient flow, and thrombosis despite anticoagulation were the most common causes of re-intervention. The strongest predictor for re-intervention for PTS was inflow disease (odds ratio 3.57, 95% confidence interval 1.26 - 10.13, p= .017).

CONCLUSION

Long term patency of deep venous stenting is good. Re-interventions are typically performed in the first year and are potentially preventable by improving the procedure and patient selection. Since secondary patency rates are excellent, selected patients may be considered for discharge from long term surveillance.

摘要

目的

静脉支架置入术在急性深静脉血栓形成(DVT)和血栓后综合征(PTS)中的应用越来越多,短期通畅效果良好,但长期数据稀缺。本研究的目的是评估急性DVT和PTS支架置入术的长期疗效,并研究再次干预的原因。

方法

本单中心队列研究回顾性纳入了2006年5月至2021年11月期间因急性DVT和PTS接受支架置入术的所有患者。通过双功超声(DUS)或计算机断层扫描研究通畅情况。主要终点是支架通畅率。采用Kaplan-Meier方法计算无再次干预生存率。次要终点是再次干预的原因,采用Pouncey分类系统(2022年)。使用二元逻辑回归计算再次干预预测因素的比值比。

结果

共纳入114例患者,涉及129条肢体(急性DVT 53例;41%),PTS 76例;59%)。急性DVT的中位随访时间为2.3年(四分位间距[IQR]2.3),PTS为5.2年(IQR 7.1)。急性DVT的原发性通畅率、继发性通畅率和永久性闭塞率分别为73.5%、98.1%和1.9%,PTS肢体分别为63.2%、92.1%和7.9%。总体而言,41条肢体至少接受了一次再次干预:急性DVT组14条,PTS组27条。大多数再次干预(82.9%)在支架置入后的第一年内进行。流入道遗漏、血流不足和抗凝后仍发生血栓形成是再次干预最常见的原因。PTS再次干预的最强预测因素是流入道疾病(比值比3.57,95%置信区间1.26 - 10.13,p = 0.017)。

结论

深静脉支架置入术的长期通畅效果良好。再次干预通常在第一年内进行,通过改进手术和患者选择可能可以预防。由于继发性通畅率极佳,对于部分患者可考虑停止长期监测。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验