Seaberg Maasa H, Kazda Tomas, Youland Ryan S, Laack Nadia N, Pafundi Deanna H, Anderson S Keith, Sarkaria Jann N, Galanis Evanthia, Brown Paul D, Brinkmann Debra H
University of California San Francisco Medical Center, Department of Radiation Oncology, San Francisco, CA, USA.
Department of Radiation Oncology, Masaryk Memorial Cancer Institute, Brno, Czech Republic.
Radiother Oncol. 2023 Nov;188:109768. doi: 10.1016/j.radonc.2023.109768. Epub 2023 Jun 28.
Patterns of failure (POF) may provide an alternative quantitative endpoint to overall survival for evaluation of novel chemoradiotherapy regimens with glioblastoma.
POF of 109 newly-diagnosed glioblastoma patients per 2016 WHO classification who received conformal radiotherapy with concomitant and adjuvant temozolomide were reviewed. Seventy-five of those patients also received an investigational chemotherapy agent (everolimus, erlotinib, or vorinostat). Recurrence volumes were defined with MRI contrast enhancement. POF at protocol (POF), initial (POF), and RANO (POF) progression timepoints were characterized by the percentage of recurrence volume within the 95% dose region. POF, POF, and POF of each patient were categorized (central, non-central, or both).
POF of the temozolomide-only control cohort were unchanged (79% central, 12% non-central, and 9% both) across protocol, initial, and RANO progression timepoints. Unlike the temozolomide-only cohort, POF of the collective novel chemotherapy cohort appeared increasingly non-central when comparing POF with POF, with a non-central component increasing from 16% to 29% (p = 0.078). POF did not correlate with overall survival or time to progression.
POF of patients receiving a novel chemotherapy appeared to be influenced by the timepoint of analysis and were increasingly non-central at protocol progression as compared with initial recurrence, suggesting that recurrence originates from the central region. Addition of everolimus and vorinostat appeared to influence POF, despite similar survival outcomes with the temozolomide-only control group. In studies dealing with novel therapeutic agents, robust and properly-timed dosimetric POF analysis may be helpful to evaluate biologic aspects of novel agents.
失败模式(POF)可能为胶质母细胞瘤新型放化疗方案的评估提供一个替代总生存的定量终点。
回顾了2016年世界卫生组织分类下109例新诊断胶质母细胞瘤患者接受适形放疗联合同步及辅助替莫唑胺治疗的POF情况。其中75例患者还接受了一种研究性化疗药物(依维莫司、厄洛替尼或伏立诺他)。复发体积通过MRI对比增强来定义。方案(POF)、初始(POF)和RANO(POF)进展时间点的POF通过95%剂量区域内复发体积的百分比来表征。每位患者的POF、POF和POF被分类(中心型、非中心型或两者皆有)。
仅使用替莫唑胺的对照组在方案、初始和RANO进展时间点的POF保持不变(79%为中心型,12%为非中心型,9%两者皆有)。与仅使用替莫唑胺的队列不同,当将POF与POF进行比较时,联合新型化疗队列的POF似乎越来越多地为非中心型,非中心型成分从16%增加到29%(p = 0.078)。POF与总生存或进展时间无关。
接受新型化疗患者的POF似乎受分析时间点的影响,与初始复发相比,在方案进展时越来越多地为非中心型,提示复发起源于中心区域。尽管与仅使用替莫唑胺的对照组生存结果相似,但添加依维莫司和伏立诺他似乎影响了POF。在涉及新型治疗药物的研究中,稳健且适时的剂量学POF分析可能有助于评估新型药物的生物学方面。