Fowler Kennedy Sport Medicine Clinic, Western University, London, Ontario; Bone and Joint Institute, Western University, London, Ontario; Department of Surgery, Western University, London, Ontario.
Department of Mechanical and Materials Engineering, Western University, London, Ontario.
Arthroscopy. 2024 Feb;40(2):362-370. doi: 10.1016/j.arthro.2023.05.037. Epub 2023 Jun 29.
To evaluate the impact of capsular management on joint constraint and femoral head translations during simulated activities of daily living (ADL).
Using 6 (n = 6) cadaveric hip specimens, the effect of capsulotomies and repair was then evaluated during simulated ADL. Joint forces and rotational kinematics associated with gait and sitting, adopted from telemeterized implant studies, were applied to the hip using a 6-degrees of freedom (DOF) joint motion simulator. Testing occurred after creation of portals, interportal capsulotomy (IPC), IPC repair, T-capsulotomy (T-Cap), partial T-Cap repair, and full T-Cap repair. The anterior-posterior (AP), medial-lateral (ML), and axial compression DOFs were operated in force control, whereas flexion-extension, adduction-abduction, and internal-external rotation were manipulated in displacement control. Resulting femoral head translations and joint reaction torques were recorded and evaluated. Subsequently, the mean-centered range of femoral head displacements and peak signed joint restraint torques were calculated and compared.
During simulated gait and sitting, the mean range of AP femoral head displacements with respect to intact exceeded 1% of the femoral head diameter after creating portals, T-Caps, and partial T-Cap repair (Wilcoxon signed rank P < .05); the mean ranges of ML displacements did not. Deviations in femoral head kinematics varied by capsule stage but were never very large. No consistent trends with respect to alterations in peak joint restrain torques were observed.
In this cadaveric biomechanical study, capsulotomy and repair minimally affected resultant femoral head translation and joint torques during simulated ADLs.
The tested ADLs appear safe to perform after surgery, regardless of capsular status, because adverse kinematics were not observed. However, further study is required to determine the importance of capsular repair beyond time-zero biomechanics and the resultant effect on patient-reported outcomes.
评估在模拟日常活动(ADL)中,囊袋管理对关节约束和股骨头移位的影响。
使用 6 个(n=6)尸体髋关节标本,评估模拟 ADL 中囊袋切开术和修复术的效果。采用从遥测植入物研究中采用的步态和坐姿相关关节力和旋转运动学,通过 6 自由度(DOF)关节运动模拟器应用于髋关节。在创建端口、端口间囊袋切开术(IPC)、IPC 修复、T 囊袋切开术(T-Cap)、部分 T-Cap 修复和完全 T-Cap 修复后进行测试。前-后(AP)、内-外侧(ML)和轴向压缩 DOF 在力控制下操作,而屈曲-伸展、内收-外展和内-外旋转在位移控制下操纵。记录和评估由此产生的股骨头位移和关节反作用力矩。随后,计算并比较了股骨头位移的平均中心范围和峰值符号关节约束力矩。
在模拟步态和坐姿时,与完整的相比,在创建端口、T-Cap 和部分 T-Cap 修复后,AP 股骨头位移的平均范围超过 1%的股骨头直径(Wilcoxon 符号秩检验 P <.05);ML 位移的平均范围没有。股骨头运动学的偏差因囊袋阶段而异,但通常不大。未观察到与峰值关节约束力矩变化相关的一致趋势。
在这项尸体生物力学研究中,囊袋切开术和修复术在模拟 ADL 中对最终股骨头移位和关节力矩的影响很小。
无论囊袋状态如何,测试的 ADL 在手术后似乎都很安全,可以进行,因为没有观察到不良运动学。然而,需要进一步的研究来确定囊袋修复除了零时间生物力学之外的重要性,以及对患者报告结果的最终影响。