• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

妇科医生对子宫颈顶端脱垂手术治疗的看法:一项定性研究。

Gynecologists' perspectives on surgical treatment for apical prolapse: a qualitative study.

机构信息

Department of Gynecology and Obstetrics, VieCuri Medical Centre, P.O. Box 1926, 5900 BX, Venlo, The Netherlands.

Department of Gynecology and Obstetrics, GROW, School for Oncology & Reproduction, Maastricht University, P.O. Box 616, 6200 MD, Maastricht, The Netherlands.

出版信息

Int Urogynecol J. 2023 Nov;34(11):2705-2712. doi: 10.1007/s00192-023-05587-1. Epub 2023 Jul 1.

DOI:10.1007/s00192-023-05587-1
PMID:37392227
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC10682281/
Abstract

INTRODUCTION AND HYPOTHESIS

Vaginal sacrospinous fixation (VSF) without mesh and sacrocolpopexy (SCP) with mesh are the most frequently performed surgical procedures for apical prolapse in the Netherlands. There is no long-term evidence suggesting the optimal technique, however. The aim was to identify which factors play a role in the choice between these surgical treatment options.

METHODS

A qualitative study using semi-structured interviews amongst Dutch gynecologists was carried out. An inductive content analysis was performed with Atlas.ti.

RESULTS

Ten interviews were analyzed. All gynecologists performed vaginal surgeries for apical prolapse, six gynecologists perform SCP themselves. Six gynecologists would perform VSF for a primary vaginal vault prolapse (VVP); three gynecologists preferred a SCP. All participants prefer a SCP for recurrent VVP. All participants have stated that multiple comorbidities could be a reason for choosing VSF, as this procedure is considered less invasive. Most participants choose a VSF in the case of older age (6 out of 10) or higher body mass index (7 out of 10). All treat primary uterine prolapse with vaginal, uterine-preserving surgery.

CONCLUSIONS

Recurrent apical prolapse is the most important factor in advising patients which treatment they should undergo for VVP or uterine descent. Also, the patient's health status and the patient's own preference are important factors. Gynecologists who do not perform the SCP in their own clinic are more likely to perform a VSF and find more reasons not to advise a SCP. All participants prefer a vaginal surgery for a primary uterine prolapse.

摘要

介绍和假设

阴道骶骨固定术(VSF)不使用网片和骶骨阴道固定术(SCP)联合网片是荷兰治疗子宫顶端脱垂最常施行的手术。然而,目前尚无长期证据表明哪种技术是最佳的。本研究旨在确定在这些手术治疗方案之间选择的因素。

方法

对荷兰妇科医生进行了一项使用半结构式访谈的定性研究。采用 Atlas.ti 进行了归纳内容分析。

结果

分析了 10 次访谈。所有妇科医生都施行阴道手术治疗子宫顶端脱垂,其中 6 位医生亲自施行 SCP。6 位妇科医生会对原发性阴道穹窿脱垂(VVP)施行 VSF;3 位妇科医生更倾向 SCP。所有参与者均更倾向对复发性 VVP 施行 SCP。所有参与者都表示,多种合并症可能是选择 VSF 的原因,因为该手术被认为侵入性更小。大多数参与者选择 VSF 的情况为年龄较大(10 人中的 6 人)或体重指数较高(10 人中的 7 人)。所有医生都采用阴道、保留子宫的手术治疗原发性子宫脱垂。

结论

复发性子宫顶端脱垂是向患者建议应施行哪种手术治疗 VVP 或子宫下降的最重要因素。此外,患者的健康状况和患者自身的偏好也是重要因素。不在自己的诊所施行 SCP 的妇科医生更可能施行 VSF,并且找到更多不建议施行 SCP 的理由。所有参与者都更倾向对原发性子宫脱垂施行阴道手术。

相似文献

1
Gynecologists' perspectives on surgical treatment for apical prolapse: a qualitative study.妇科医生对子宫颈顶端脱垂手术治疗的看法:一项定性研究。
Int Urogynecol J. 2023 Nov;34(11):2705-2712. doi: 10.1007/s00192-023-05587-1. Epub 2023 Jul 1.
2
Surgical management practice of pelvic organ prolapse among Ethiopian gynecologists, 2021: a descriptive study.2021 年埃塞俄比亚妇科医生在盆腔器官脱垂中的手术管理实践:一项描述性研究。
BMC Womens Health. 2023 Dec 8;23(1):654. doi: 10.1186/s12905-023-02818-x.
3
Gynecologists' perspectives on two types of uterus-preserving surgical repair of uterine descent; sacrospinous hysteropexy versus modified Manchester.妇科医生对子宫脱垂两种保留子宫手术修复方式的看法:骶棘韧带子宫固定术与改良曼彻斯特手术对比
Int Urogynecol J. 2021 Apr;32(4):835-840. doi: 10.1007/s00192-020-04568-y. Epub 2020 Oct 26.
4
Laparoscopic sacrocolpopexy versus vaginal sacrospinous fixation for vaginal vault prolapse: a randomised controlled trial and prospective cohort (SALTO-2 trial).腹腔镜骶骨阴道固定术与阴道骶棘韧带固定术治疗阴道穹窿脱垂的随机对照试验和前瞻性队列研究(SALTO-2 试验)。
BJOG. 2023 Nov;130(12):1542-1551. doi: 10.1111/1471-0528.17525. Epub 2023 May 2.
5
Guideline No. 413: Surgical Management of Apical Pelvic Organ Prolapse in Women.指南第 413 号:女性 apical pelvic organ prolapse 的手术治疗。
J Obstet Gynaecol Can. 2021 Apr;43(4):511-523.e1. doi: 10.1016/j.jogc.2021.02.001. Epub 2021 Feb 3.
6
Two parallel, pragmatic, UK multicentre, randomised controlled trials comparing surgical options for upper compartment (vault or uterine) pelvic organ prolapse (the VUE Study): study protocol for a randomised controlled trial.两项平行、实用的英国多中心随机对照试验,比较上盆腔(穹窿或子宫)盆腔器官脱垂的手术选择(VUE研究):一项随机对照试验的研究方案
Trials. 2016 Sep 8;17(1):441. doi: 10.1186/s13063-016-1576-x.
7
Vaginal vault prolapse and recurrent surgery: A nationwide observational cohort study.阴道穹隆脱垂和再次手术:一项全国性观察队列研究。
Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand. 2022 May;101(5):542-549. doi: 10.1111/aogs.14341. Epub 2022 Mar 2.
8
Comparison of patients undergoing vaginal hysterectomy with sacrospinous ligament fixation, laparoscopic hysterectomy with sacrocolpopexy and abdominal hysterectomy with sacrocolpopexy in terms of postoperative quality of life and sexual function.比较经阴道子宫切除术联合骶棘韧带固定术、腹腔镜子宫切除术联合骶骨阴道固定术和经腹子宫切除术联合骶骨阴道固定术患者的术后生活质量和性功能。
J Gynecol Obstet Hum Reprod. 2021 Apr;50(4):101977. doi: 10.1016/j.jogoh.2020.101977. Epub 2020 Nov 6.
9
Uterine preservation vs hysterectomy in pelvic organ prolapse surgery: a systematic review with meta-analysis and clinical practice guidelines.子宫保留与子宫切除术在盆腔器官脱垂手术中的比较:系统评价与荟萃分析及临床实践指南。
Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2018 Aug;219(2):129-146.e2. doi: 10.1016/j.ajog.2018.01.018. Epub 2018 Jan 17.
10
Repair of recurrent vaginal vault prolapse using sacrospinous ligament fixation with mesh interposition and reinforcement.使用带网片置入和加强的骶棘韧带固定术修复复发性阴道穹窿脱垂。
Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand. 2005 Oct;84(10):992-5. doi: 10.1111/j.0001-6349.2005.00821.x.

本文引用的文献

1
Laparoscopic sacrocolpopexy versus vaginal sacrospinous fixation for vaginal vault prolapse: a randomised controlled trial and prospective cohort (SALTO-2 trial).腹腔镜骶骨阴道固定术与阴道骶棘韧带固定术治疗阴道穹窿脱垂的随机对照试验和前瞻性队列研究(SALTO-2 试验)。
BJOG. 2023 Nov;130(12):1542-1551. doi: 10.1111/1471-0528.17525. Epub 2023 May 2.
2
Risk factors for primary pelvic organ prolapse and prolapse recurrence: an updated systematic review and meta-analysis.原发性盆腔器官脱垂和脱垂复发的危险因素:更新的系统评价和荟萃分析。
Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2022 Aug;227(2):192-208. doi: 10.1016/j.ajog.2022.04.046. Epub 2022 Apr 30.
3
Vaginal vault prolapse and recurrent surgery: A nationwide observational cohort study.阴道穹隆脱垂和再次手术:一项全国性观察队列研究。
Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand. 2022 May;101(5):542-549. doi: 10.1111/aogs.14341. Epub 2022 Mar 2.
4
Spinal Anesthesia or General Anesthesia for Hip Surgery in Older Adults.老年人髋关节手术选择椎管内麻醉或全身麻醉。
N Engl J Med. 2021 Nov 25;385(22):2025-2035. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa2113514. Epub 2021 Oct 9.
5
Comparison of the effectiveness of sacrospinous ligament fixation and sacrocolpopexy: a meta-analysis.骶棘韧带固定与骶骨阴道固定术治疗效果的比较:一项荟萃分析。
Int Urogynecol J. 2022 Jan;33(1):3-13. doi: 10.1007/s00192-021-04823-w. Epub 2021 Jun 3.
6
Pelvic organ prolapse after laparoscopic hysterectomy compared with vaginal hysterectomy: the POP-UP study.腹腔镜子宫切除术与阴道子宫切除术治疗盆腔器官脱垂的比较:POP-UP 研究。
Int Urogynecol J. 2021 Apr;32(4):841-850. doi: 10.1007/s00192-020-04591-z. Epub 2020 Nov 10.
7
Long-term safety and efficacy of laparoscopically placed mesh for apical prolapse.腹腔镜下放置网片治疗 apical prolapse 的长期安全性和有效性。
Int Urogynecol J. 2021 Apr;32(4):871-877. doi: 10.1007/s00192-020-04374-6. Epub 2020 Jun 10.
8
Hysteropexy in the treatment of uterine prolapse stage 2 or higher: laparoscopic sacrohysteropexy versus sacrospinous hysteropexy-a multicentre randomised controlled trial (LAVA trial).经阴道子宫骶骨固定术治疗 2 度或 2 度以上子宫脱垂:腹腔镜骶骨子宫固定术与骶棘韧带固定术的多中心随机对照试验(LAVA 试验)
BJOG. 2020 Sep;127(10):1284-1293. doi: 10.1111/1471-0528.16242. Epub 2020 May 10.
9
Surgical interventions for uterine prolapse and for vault prolapse: the two VUE RCTs.手术干预治疗子宫脱垂和阴道顶端脱垂:两项 VUE RCT 研究。
Health Technol Assess. 2020 Mar;24(13):1-220. doi: 10.3310/hta24130.
10
Sacrospinous hysteropexy versus vaginal hysterectomy with uterosacral ligament suspension in women with uterine prolapse stage 2 or higher: observational follow-up of a multicentre randomised trial.骶棘韧带固定术与阴道子宫切除术联合子宫骶骨韧带悬吊术治疗 2 度或以上子宫脱垂的疗效比较:多中心随机试验的随访观察。
BMJ. 2019 Sep 10;366:l5149. doi: 10.1136/bmj.l5149.