Suppr超能文献

神经危重症监护中非惊厥性癫痫持续状态:预后评分的批判性再评估。

Nonconvulsive status epilepticus in neurocritical care: A critical reappraisal of outcome prediction scores.

机构信息

Neurocritical Care Unit, Institute for Intensive Care Medicine and Department of Neurosurgery, University Hospital Zurich, University of Zurich, Zurich, Switzerland.

Department of Neurology, Clinical Neuroscience Center, University Hospital Zurich, University of Zurich, Zurich, Switzerland.

出版信息

Epilepsia. 2023 Sep;64(9):2409-2420. doi: 10.1111/epi.17708. Epub 2023 Jul 7.

Abstract

OBJECTIVE

Nonconvulsive status epilepticus (NCSE) is a frequent condition in the neurocritical care unit (NCCU) patient population, with high morbidity and mortality. We aimed to assess the validity of available outcome prediction scores for prognostication in an NCCU patient population in relation to their admission reason (NCSE vs. non-NCSE related).

METHODS

All 196 consecutive patients diagnosed with NCSE during the NCCU stay between January 2010 and December 2020 were included. Demographics, Simplified Acute Physiology Score II (SAPS II), NCSE characteristics, and in-hospital and 3-month outcome were extracted from the electronic charts. Status Epilepticus Severity Score (STESS), Epidemiology-Based Mortality Score in Status Epilepticus (EMSE), and encephalitis, NCSE, diazepam resistance, imaging features, and tracheal intubation score (END-IT) were evaluated as previously described. Univariable and multivariable analysis and comparison of sensitivity/specificity/positive and negative predictive values/accuracy were performed.

RESULTS

A total of 30.1% died during the hospital stay, and 63.5% of survivors did not achieve favorable outcome at 3 months after onset of NCSE. Patients admitted primarily due to NCSE had longer NCSE duration and were more likely to be intubated at diagnosis. The receiver operating characteristic (ROC) for SAPS II, EMSE, and STESS when predicting mortality was between .683 and .762. The ROC for SAPS II, EMSE, STESS, and END-IT when predicting 3-month outcome was between .649 and .710. The accuracy in predicting mortality/outcome was low, when considering both proposed cutoffs and optimized cutoffs (estimated using the Youden Index) as well as when adjusting for admission reason.

SIGNIFICANCE

The scores EMSE, STESS, and END-IT perform poorly when predicting outcome of patients with NCSE in an NCCU environment. They should be interpreted cautiously and only in conjunction with other clinical data in this particular patient group.

摘要

目的

非惊厥性癫痫持续状态(NCSE)是神经重症监护病房(NCCU)患者中一种常见的疾病,具有较高的发病率和死亡率。我们旨在评估现有的预后预测评分在 NCCU 患者人群中的有效性,以及它们与入院原因(NCSE 相关与非 NCSE 相关)的关系。

方法

纳入 2010 年 1 月至 2020 年 12 月期间在 NCCU 住院期间被诊断为 NCSE 的 196 例连续患者。从电子病历中提取患者的人口统计学、简化急性生理学评分 II(SAPS II)、NCSE 特征、住院期间和 3 个月的结局。评估状态癫痫严重程度评分(STESS)、基于病因的癫痫持续状态死亡率评分(EMSE)和脑炎、NCSE、地西泮耐药、影像学特征和气管插管评分(END-IT)。进行单变量和多变量分析,并比较敏感性/特异性/阳性和阴性预测值/准确性。

结果

共有 30.1%的患者在住院期间死亡,63.5%的幸存者在 NCSE 发作后 3 个月时未获得良好的结局。因 NCSE 入院的患者 NCSE 持续时间更长,且在诊断时更有可能被插管。SAPS II、EMSE 和 STESS 预测死亡率的受试者工作特征(ROC)曲线在 0.683 到 0.762 之间。SAPS II、EMSE、STESS 和 END-IT 预测 3 个月结局的 ROC 在 0.649 到 0.710 之间。考虑到两个建议的截断值和优化的截断值(使用约登指数估计)以及调整入院原因,这些评分在预测死亡率/结局方面的准确性都较低。

意义

在 NCCU 环境中,EMSE、STESS 和 END-IT 等评分在预测 NCSE 患者结局方面表现不佳。在这个特定的患者群体中,应该谨慎解读这些评分,并且仅将其与其他临床数据结合使用。

相似文献

1
Nonconvulsive status epilepticus in neurocritical care: A critical reappraisal of outcome prediction scores.
Epilepsia. 2023 Sep;64(9):2409-2420. doi: 10.1111/epi.17708. Epub 2023 Jul 7.
2
Prognostic value of Salzburg nonconvulsive status epilepticus criteria: The SACE score.
Epilepsia. 2024 Jan;65(1):138-147. doi: 10.1111/epi.17830. Epub 2023 Nov 28.
3
External validation of the epidemiology-based mortality score in status epilepticus in an American intensive care population.
Epilepsy Res. 2018 Dec;148:32-36. doi: 10.1016/j.eplepsyres.2018.10.001. Epub 2018 Oct 3.
4
Elderly patients with nonconvulsive status epilepticus: Clinical-EEG data, hospital mortality, STESS and EMSE.
Seizure. 2022 Jan;94:18-22. doi: 10.1016/j.seizure.2021.11.004. Epub 2021 Nov 11.
5
Comparison of scoring tools for the prediction of in-hospital mortality in status epilepticus.
Seizure. 2018 Mar;56:92-97. doi: 10.1016/j.seizure.2018.01.024. Epub 2018 Feb 1.
7
Prediction of in-hospital mortality in status epilepticus: Evaluation of four scoring tools in younger and older adult patients.
Epilepsy Behav. 2021 Jan;114(Pt A):107572. doi: 10.1016/j.yebeh.2020.107572. Epub 2020 Nov 29.
8
Predictors of outcomes and refractoriness in status epilepticus: A prospective study.
Epilepsy Behav. 2017 Oct;75:158-164. doi: 10.1016/j.yebeh.2017.07.046. Epub 2017 Sep 15.
9
Clinical utility of EMSE and STESS in predicting hospital mortality for status epilepticus.
Seizure. 2018 Aug;60:23-28. doi: 10.1016/j.seizure.2018.05.017. Epub 2018 May 25.
10
Severity scores for status epilepticus in the ICU: systemic illness also matters.
Crit Care. 2023 Jan 16;27(1):19. doi: 10.1186/s13054-022-04276-7.

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验