Unit of Neurology, Department of Medicine and Surgery, University of Parma, Parma, Italy.
Unit of Neurology, University Hospital of Parma, Parma, Italy.
Epilepsia. 2024 Jan;65(1):138-147. doi: 10.1111/epi.17830. Epub 2023 Nov 28.
This study was undertaken to investigate the association between the Salzburg nonconvulsive status epilepticus (NCSE) criteria and in-hospital outcome, to determine the predictive accuracy of the Status Epilepticus Severity Score (STESS), modified STESS (mSTESS), Epidemiology-Based Mortality Score in Status Epilepticus (EMSE), and END-IT (encephalitis, NCSE, diazepam resistance, imaging features, and tracheal intubation) in NCSE patients, and to develop a new prognostic score specifically designed for NCSE patients.
Clinical and electroencephalographic (EEG) data of adult patients treated for NCSE from 2020 to 2023 were retrospectively assessed. Age, sex, modified Rankin Scale at admission, comorbidities, history of seizures, etiology, status epilepticus type, and outcome were collected from the patients' digital charts. EEG data were assessed and categorized applying the Salzburg NCSE criteria. In-hospital death was defined as the primary outcome.
A total of 116 NCSE patients were included. Multivariable logistic regression revealed that Salzburg NCSE criterion A2 (ictal morphological, spatial, and temporal evolution) was associated with in-hospital survival. The best STESS cutoff was ≥4 (sensitivity = .62, specificity = .69, accuracy = 67%). mSTESS ≥ 5 reached a sensitivity of .68, a specificity of .57, and an overall accuracy of 60%, EMSE ≥ 64 a sensitivity of .82, a specificity of .39, and an overall accuracy of 52%, and END-IT ≥ 3 a sensitivity of .65, a specificity of .44, and an overall accuracy of 50%. Through a hypothesis-generating approach, we developed the SACE score, which integrates EEG features (criterion A2) with patient age (with a 75-year cutoff), history of seizures, and level of consciousness. With a cutoff of ≥3, it had a sensitivity of .77, a specificity of .74, and an overall accuracy of 76%, performing better than other prognostic scores.
We developed a new user-friendly scoring system, the SACE score, which integrates EEG features with other established outcome-related variables assessable in early stages, to assist neurologists and neurointensivists in making more tailored prognostic decisions for NCSE patients.
本研究旨在探讨萨尔茨堡非惊厥性癫痫持续状态(NCSE)标准与院内结局之间的关系,确定癫痫持续状态严重程度评分(STESS)、改良 STESS(mSTESS)、基于病因的癫痫持续状态死亡率评分(EMSE)和 END-IT(脑炎、NCSE、地西泮耐药、影像学特征和气管插管)在 NCSE 患者中的预测准确性,并为 NCSE 患者专门设计一种新的预后评分。
回顾性评估了 2020 年至 2023 年期间接受 NCSE 治疗的成年患者的临床和脑电图(EEG)数据。从患者的电子病历中收集年龄、性别、入院时改良 Rankin 量表、合并症、癫痫发作史、病因、癫痫持续状态类型和结局。评估 EEG 数据并应用萨尔茨堡 NCSE 标准进行分类。院内死亡定义为主要结局。
共纳入 116 例 NCSE 患者。多变量逻辑回归显示,萨尔茨堡 NCSE 标准 A2(发作时形态、空间和时间演变)与院内生存相关。最佳 STESS 截断值为≥4(敏感性=.62,特异性=.69,准确性=.67%)。mSTESS≥5 达到敏感性 68%、特异性 57%和总体准确性 60%,EMSE≥64 达到敏感性 82%、特异性 39%和总体准确性 52%,END-IT≥3 达到敏感性 65%、特异性 44%和总体准确性 50%。通过假设生成方法,我们开发了 SACE 评分,该评分整合了脑电图特征(标准 A2)和患者年龄(以 75 岁为界)、癫痫发作史和意识水平。截断值≥3 时,其敏感性为 77%,特异性为 74%,总准确性为 76%,优于其他预后评分。
我们开发了一种新的易于使用的评分系统 SACE 评分,该评分将脑电图特征与其他可在早期评估的既定与结局相关的变量相结合,以帮助神经科医生和神经重症监护医生为 NCSE 患者做出更具针对性的预后决策。