Department of Caring Sciences, Faculty of Health and Occupational Studies, University of Gävle, Gävle, Sweden.
Department of Neurobiology, Care Sciences and Society (NVS), Aging Research Centre (ARC), Karolinska Institute, Stockholm, Sweden.
Work. 2023;76(4):1481-1492. doi: 10.3233/WOR-220480.
Health and work environment are known factors in being active in working life beyond legal retirement.
To investigate sociodemographic, health and work environment factors as possible predictors of being active in working life at ages 66 and 72. Secondly, investigate eventual changes over time, shortly after a major reform in the Swedish pension system, and predictors of still being active in working life at age 66.
We used a longitudinal design with two separate cohorts of people at age 60. One baseline assessment was made in 2001-2003 with two 6 years follow-ups, and one in 2007-2009 with one 6 years follow-up. Data were accessed through a Swedish national population-based study and analysed using logistic regression. To examine possible differences between the two cohorts, interaction terms with each independent variable were analysed.
Being a man and working in a profession that requires at least three years of university education predicted that the person would still be active in working life at age 66 and 72. Additionally, having a light level of physical activity at work and being diagnosed with fewer than two diseases, also predicted still being active in working life at age 66. Only physical activity at work showed significant changes over time.
Shortly after a major reform of the public pension system, there was an increase in participation in working life after age 66 and 72. However, gender, profession, and health factors are still important considerations regarding older people's participation in working life.
健康和工作环境是影响人们在法定退休年龄后继续积极工作的已知因素。
调查社会人口统计学、健康和工作环境因素,以确定它们是否是 66 岁和 72 岁时仍积极工作的预测因素。其次,研究在瑞典养老金制度重大改革后不久的时间内可能发生的变化,以及预测 66 岁时仍在工作的因素。
我们使用了一个具有两个独立队列的纵向设计,队列中的人年龄为 60 岁。一次基线评估是在 2001-2003 年进行的,有两次 6 年的随访,另一次是在 2007-2009 年进行的,有一次 6 年的随访。数据通过一项瑞典全国性的人口研究获取,并使用逻辑回归进行分析。为了研究两个队列之间的可能差异,我们分析了每个独立变量的交互项。
男性和从事需要至少三年大学教育的职业的人更有可能在 66 岁和 72 岁时仍积极工作。此外,工作时体力活动水平较轻和被诊断出的疾病少于两种,也预示着 66 岁时仍会积极工作。只有工作时的体力活动显示出随时间的显著变化。
在公共养老金制度重大改革后不久,66 岁和 72 岁后参与工作生活的人数有所增加。然而,性别、职业和健康因素仍然是考虑老年人参与工作生活的重要因素。