Suppr超能文献

积极老龄化生活的自主性如何?一项关于延长职业生涯决定因素的生命历程研究。

How voluntary is the active ageing life? A life-course study on the determinants of extending careers.

作者信息

Madero-Cabib Ignacio, Kaeser Laure

机构信息

LIVES Research Centre - Life Course and Inequality Research Centre, University of Lausanne, Quartier UNIL-Mouline, Bâtiment Géopolis, Bureau 5609, 1015 Lausanne, Switzerland.

LIVES Research Centre - Centre for the Interdisciplinary Study of Gerontology and Vulnerability, University of Applied Sciences and Arts of Western Switzerland, Route des Acacias 54, 1227 Carouge, Switzerland.

出版信息

Eur J Ageing. 2015 Sep 14;13(1):25-37. doi: 10.1007/s10433-015-0355-y. eCollection 2016 Mar.

Abstract

In Switzerland, as in many other European states, there is an increasing emphasis in public policy on promoting later retirement from the labour market. But this accelerating drive in Swiss policy-making to extend occupational activity does not mean that every worker is currently likely to retire late, nor does it imply that all those who do retire late do so voluntarily. This article uses a life-course approach, first to study the determinants of late retirement, and secondly to analyse whether the decision to postpone retirement is made voluntarily or involuntarily. Both objectives are addressed on the basis of data from the Swiss survey Vivre/Leben/Vivere. The results of logistic regression modelling indicate that, whereas self-employed and more highly educated individuals are more likely to retire late, people with access to private pension funds and workers who have benefited from periods of economic growth have a lower tendency to retire late. Regarding voluntariness, those who are more likely to opt for voluntary late retirement tend to be Swiss citizens, more highly educated, and also benefited from periods of economic expansion, while the self-employed, men and widowed individuals leaving the labour market late tend to do so involuntarily. In conclusion, the article discusses the absence of a social inequality debate in the design of active ageing policies.

摘要

在瑞士,与许多其他欧洲国家一样,公共政策越来越强调促进劳动者延迟退休。但瑞士决策层推动延长职业活动的这一加速趋势,并不意味着每个劳动者目前都有可能延迟退休,也不意味着所有延迟退休的人都是自愿的。本文采用生命历程方法,首先研究延迟退休的决定因素,其次分析延迟退休的决定是自愿还是非自愿做出的。这两个目标都是基于瑞士“生活/生存/生活”调查的数据来探讨的。逻辑回归模型的结果表明,虽然个体经营者和受教育程度较高的人更有可能延迟退休,但有私人养老金的人和受益于经济增长时期的劳动者延迟退休的倾向较低。关于自愿性,那些更有可能选择自愿延迟退休的人往往是瑞士公民,受教育程度较高,并且也受益于经济扩张时期,而个体经营者、男性和较晚离开劳动力市场的丧偶者往往是被迫延迟退休。总之,本文讨论了积极老龄化政策设计中缺乏社会不平等辩论的问题。

相似文献

5
Retirement and wealth.退休与财富。
Soc Secur Bull. 2001;64(2):66-91. doi: 10.3386/w8229.
7
The politics of ageing and retirement: Evidence from Swiss referenda.老龄化和退休政策:来自瑞士公投的证据。
Popul Stud (Camb). 2021 Mar;75(1):3-18. doi: 10.1080/00324728.2020.1841270. Epub 2020 Nov 18.

引用本文的文献

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验