Department of Diagnostic Radiology, Tokai University School of Medicine, Isehara, Japan.
Department of Biomedical Engineering, Tokai University School of Engineering, Hiratsuka, Japan.
Br J Radiol. 2023 Nov;96(1151):20220951. doi: 10.1259/bjr.20220951. Epub 2023 Jul 10.
This study aimed to compare the image quality and diagnostic performance of computed diffusion-weighted imaging (DWI) with low-apparent diffusion coefficient (ADC)-pixel cut-off technique (cDWI cut-off) and actual measured DWI (mDWI).
Eighty-seven consecutive patients with malignant breast lesions and 72 with negative breast lesions who underwent breast MRI were retrospectively evaluated. Computed DWI with high b-values of 800, 1200, and 1500 s/mm and ADC cut-off thresholds of none, 0, 0.3, and 0.6 (×10 mm/s) were generated from DWI with two b-values (0 and 800 s/mm). To identify the optimal conditions, two radiologists evaluated the fat suppression and lesion reduction failure using a cut-off technique. The contrast between breast cancer and glandular tissue was evaluated using region of interest analysis. Three other board-certified radiologists independently assessed the optimised cDWI cut-off and mDWI data sets. Diagnostic performance was evaluated using receiver operating characteristic (ROC) analysis.
When an ADC cut-off threshold of 0.3 or 0.6 (× 10 mm/s) was applied, fat suppression improved significantly ( < .05). The contrast of the cDWI cut-off with a b-value of 1200 or 1500 s/mm was better than the mDWI ( < .01). The ROC area under the curve for breast cancer detection was 0.837 for the mDWI and 0.909 for the cDWI cut-off ( < .01).
The cDWI cut-off provided better diagnostic performance than mDWI for breast cancer detection.
Using the low-ADC-pixel cut-off technique, computed DWI can improve diagnostic performance by increasing contrast and eliminating un-suppressed fat signals.
本研究旨在比较低表观扩散系数(ADC)-像素截断技术(cDWI 截断)和实际测量弥散加权成像(mDWI)的图像质量和诊断性能。
回顾性分析 87 例恶性乳腺病变和 72 例乳腺阴性病变患者的乳腺 MRI 检查资料。在双 b 值(0 和 800 s/mm)弥散加权成像(DWI)的基础上生成高 b 值(800、1200 和 1500 s/mm)的计算 DWI 以及 ADC 截断阈值为 0、0.3 和 0.6(×10 mm/s)。两位放射科医生使用截断技术评估脂肪抑制和病变检出失败情况,以确定最佳条件。使用感兴趣区分析评估乳腺癌与腺体组织之间的对比度。另外三位经过认证的放射科医生独立评估优化后的 cDWI 截断和 mDWI 数据集。使用受试者工作特征(ROC)分析评估诊断性能。
当应用 ADC 截断阈值为 0.3 或 0.6(×10 mm/s)时,脂肪抑制明显改善(<0.05)。b 值为 1200 或 1500 s/mm 时,cDWI 截断的对比度优于 mDWI(<0.01)。乳腺癌检测的 mDWI 和 cDWI 截断的 ROC 曲线下面积分别为 0.837 和 0.909(<0.01)。
cDWI 截断用于乳腺癌检测的诊断性能优于 mDWI。
使用低 ADC 像素截断技术,计算 DWI 可以通过增加对比度和消除未抑制的脂肪信号来提高诊断性能。