Cheng Qingyuan, Ye Shuxin, Fu Chuqi, Zhou Jiejie, He Xiaxia, Miao Haiwei, Xu Nina, Wang Meihao
1 Department of Radiology, First Affiliated Hospital of Wenzhou Medical University, Wenzhou, China.
Br J Radiol. 2019 Aug;92(1100):20180978. doi: 10.1259/bjr.20180978. Epub 2019 Jul 10.
To assess the value of computed diffusion-weighted imaging (cDWI) and voxelwise computed diffusion-weighted imaging (vcDWI) in breast cancer.
This retrospective study involved 130 patients (age range, 25-70 years; mean age ± standard deviation, 48.6 ± 10.5 years) with 130 malignant lesions, who underwent MRI examinations, including a DWI sequence, prior to needle biopsy or surgery. cDWIs with higher -values of 1500, 2000, 2500, 3000, 3500, and 4000 s/mm, and vcDWI were generated from measured (m) DWI with two lower -values of 0/600, 0/800, or 0/1000 s/mm. The signal-to-noise ratio (SNR) and contrast ratio (CR) of all image sets were computed and compared among different DWIs by two experienced radiologists independently. To better compare the CR with the SNR, the CR value was multiplied by 100 (CR100).
The CR of vcDWI, and cDWIs, except for cDWI, differed significantly from that of measured diffusion-weighted imaging (mDWI) (cDWI: CR = 0.4904, = 0.394; cDWI: CR = 0.5503, p = 0.006; cDWI: CR = 0.5889, p < 0.001; cDWI: CR = 0.6109, < 0.001; cDWI: mean = 0.6214, < 0.001; cDWI: CR = 0.6245, < 0.001; cDWI: CR = 0.6228, < 0.001). The vcDWI provided the highest CR, while the CRs of all cDWI image sets improved with increased -values. The SNR of neither cDWI nor vcDWI differed significantly from that of mDWI, but the mean SNRs of the remaining cDWIs were significantly lower than that of mDWI. The SNRs of cDWIs declined with increasing -values, and the initial decrease at low -values was steeper than the gradual attenuation at higher -values; the CR rose gradually, and the two converged on the -value interval of 1500-2000 s/mm .
The highest CR was achieved with vcDWI; this could be a promising approach easier detection of breast cancer.
This study comprehensively compared and evaluated the value of the emerging post-processing DWI techniques (including a set of cDWIs and vcDWI) in breast cancer.
评估计算机扩散加权成像(cDWI)和体素内计算机扩散加权成像(vcDWI)在乳腺癌中的价值。
本回顾性研究纳入130例患者(年龄范围25 - 70岁;平均年龄±标准差,48.6±10.5岁),共130个恶性病变,这些患者在进行穿刺活检或手术前接受了包括扩散加权成像(DWI)序列在内的MRI检查。从测量得到的(m)DWI生成b值分别为1500、2000、2500、3000、3500和4000 s/mm²的cDWI,以及b值为0/600、0/800或0/1000 s/mm²的vcDWI。由两位经验丰富的放射科医生独立计算并比较所有图像集的信噪比(SNR)和对比率(CR),以评估不同DWI之间的差异。为了更好地将CR与SNR进行比较,将CR值乘以100(CR100)。
vcDWI以及除cDWI(b值 = 1500 s/mm²)之外的其他cDWI的CR与测量扩散加权成像(mDWI)相比有显著差异(cDWI:CR = 0.4904,p = 0.394;cDWI:CR = 0.5503,p = 0.006;cDWI:CR = 0.5889,p < 0.001;cDWI:CR = 0.6109,p < 0.001;cDWI:平均值 = 0.6214,p < 0.001;cDWI:CR = 0.6245,p < 0.001;cDWI:CR = 0.6228,p < 0.001)。vcDWI提供了最高的CR,并且所有cDWI图像集的CR随着b值增加而提高。cDWI和vcDWI的SNR与mDWI相比均无显著差异,但其余cDWI的平均SNR显著低于mDWI。cDWI的SNR随着b值增加而下降,在低b值时的初始下降比高b值时的逐渐衰减更陡峭;CR则逐渐上升,两者在b值1500 - 2000 s/mm²区间交汇。
vcDWI获得了最高的CR;这可能是一种更易于检测乳腺癌的有前景的方法。
本研究全面比较和评估了新兴的后处理DWI技术(包括一组cDWI和vcDWI)在乳腺癌中的价值。