Cardiology Department, Hillel Yaffe Medical Center, Hadera, Israel; Rappaport Faculty of Medicine, Technion - Israel Institute of Technology, Haifa, Israel.
Cardiology Department, Assuta Ashdod University Hospital, Ashdod, Israel; Ben-Gurion University of the Negev, Ashdod, Israel.
Am J Cardiol. 2023 Aug 15;201:268-272. doi: 10.1016/j.amjcard.2023.06.004. Epub 2023 Jun 30.
Risk models to estimate percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) mortality have limited value in complex high-risk patients. However, it was improved by a recently developed bedside model to predict in-hospital mortality using data from the American College of Cardiology CathPCI Registry that included 706,263 patients. The median risk-standardized in-hospital mortality rate was 1.9%. In an attempt to validate this model in patients admitted because of acute coronary ischemia to predict in-hospital, 30-day, and 1-year mortality, we applied the proposed risk score to the study population of the Acute Coronary Syndrome Israeli Survey (ACSIS). This study was conducted for 2 months in 2018 and included all patients admitted to 25 coronary care units and cardiology departments in Israel. The ACSIS included 1,155 patients admitted because of acute myocardial infarction and who underwent PCI. In-hospital, 30-day, and 1-year mortality were 2.3%, 3.1%, and 6.2%, respectively. The CathPCI risk score yielded an area under the receiver operating characteristic curve of 0.96 (95% confidence interval [CI] 0.94 to 0.99) for in-hospital mortality; 0.96 (95% CI 0.94 to 0.98) for the 30-day mortality, and 0.88 (95% CI 0.83 to 0.93) for the 1-year mortality. The current model also included frail patients, and those with aortic stenosis, refractory shock, and after cardiac arrest. In conclusion, the CathPCI Registry risk score was validated using data from the ACSIS. Because the ACSIS population comprised patients with acute ischemia including those with high-risk features this model demonstrates a wider scope of application compared with previous ones. In addition, the model seems to be suitable to predict also the 30-day and 1-year mortality.
用于估算经皮冠状动脉介入治疗 (PCI) 死亡率的风险模型在复杂的高危患者中的应用价值有限。然而,最近开发的一种床边模型通过使用包含 706263 名患者的美国心脏病学会 CathPCI 注册中心的数据来预测住院死亡率,从而提高了其预测能力。中位风险标准化住院死亡率为 1.9%。为了尝试在因急性冠状动脉缺血而入院的患者中验证该模型以预测住院、30 天和 1 年死亡率,我们将提出的风险评分应用于急性冠状动脉综合征以色列调查(ACSIS)的研究人群。该研究于 2018 年进行了 2 个月,纳入了以色列 25 个冠心病监护病房和心脏病科的所有入院患者。ACSIS 纳入了 1155 名因急性心肌梗死接受 PCI 的患者。住院、30 天和 1 年的死亡率分别为 2.3%、3.1%和 6.2%。CathPCI 风险评分对住院死亡率的受试者工作特征曲线下面积为 0.96(95%置信区间 [CI] 0.94 至 0.99);对 30 天死亡率的曲线下面积为 0.96(95%CI 0.94 至 0.98);对 1 年死亡率的曲线下面积为 0.88(95%CI 0.83 至 0.93)。该模型还包括虚弱患者、主动脉瓣狭窄患者、难治性休克患者和心脏骤停后患者。总之,使用 ACSIS 的数据验证了 CathPCI 登记处风险评分。由于 ACSIS 人群包括急性缺血患者,包括高危特征患者,因此与之前的模型相比,该模型的应用范围更广。此外,该模型似乎也适用于预测 30 天和 1 年的死亡率。