Suppr超能文献

适可而止:严重人工关节周围感染的挽救手术

Enough is enough: salvage procedures in severe periprosthetic joint infection.

作者信息

Gramlich Yves, Parvizi Javad

机构信息

Department of Trauma and Orthopedic Surgery, Berufsgenossenschaftliche Unfallklinik Frankfurt Am Main, Frankfurt, 60389, Germany.

Rothman Orthopaedic Institute at Thomas Jefferson University, Philadelphia, PA, 19107, USA.

出版信息

Arthroplasty. 2023 Jul 3;5(1):36. doi: 10.1186/s42836-023-00182-7.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

In severe cases of periprosthetic joint infection involving negative host-dependent factors, individual-based decisions between a curative therapy vs. salvage procedure are necessary. We aimed to review salvage procedures in severe periprosthetic joint infection cases, where a gold standard of a curative two-stage exchange can no longer be achieved. The options of knee arthrodesis, amputation, persistent fistula (stable drainage), or a debridement, antibiotics, and implant retention procedure in late-onset cases are discussed, including lifelong antibiotic suppression alone.

METHODS

We focused on known salvage procedures for severe periprosthetic joint infection of the hip and knee, such as amputation, arthrodesis, antibiotic suppression, persistent fistula, and debridement, antibiotics, and implant retention in late-stage infections, and the role of local antibiotics. The current literature regarding indications and outcomes was reviewed.

RESULTS

Whereas a successful single-stage above-knee amputation can be a curative effort in younger patients, this is associated with limited outcome in older patients, as the proportion who receive an exoprosthesis leading to independent mobility is low. Therefore, arthrodesis using an intramedullary modular nail is an option for limb salvage, pain reduction, and preservation of quality of life and everyday life mobility, when revision total knee arthroplasty is not an option. Carrying out a persistent fistula using a stable drainage system, as well as a lifelong antibiotic suppression therapy, can be an option, in cases where no other surgery is possible. Active clinical surveillance should then be carried out. A debridement, antibiotics, and implant retention procedure in combination with local degradable antibiotics can be used and is an encouraging new option, but should not been carried out twice.

CONCLUSION

Whereas the gold standard in periprosthetic joint infection treatment of late infections remains the exchange of the prosthesis, salvage procedures should be considered in the cases of reduced life expectancy, several recurrences of the infection, patients having preference and negative host factors. In these cases, the appropriate salvage procedure can temporarily lead to remission of the infection and the possibility to maintain mobility.

摘要

背景

在假体周围关节感染的严重病例中,若存在不利于宿主的因素,则需要基于个体情况决定采用根治性治疗还是挽救性手术。我们旨在回顾严重假体周围关节感染病例的挽救性手术,这类病例已无法达到根治性两阶段置换的金标准。本文讨论了膝关节融合术、截肢术、持续性瘘管(稳定引流),以及晚期病例的清创、抗生素治疗和保留植入物手术等选择,包括单纯终身抗生素抑制治疗。

方法

我们重点关注髋膝关节严重假体周围关节感染的已知挽救性手术,如截肢术、关节融合术、抗生素抑制治疗、持续性瘘管,以及晚期感染的清创、抗生素治疗和保留植入物手术,还有局部抗生素的作用。回顾了关于适应证和治疗结果的现有文献。

结果

虽然成功的一期膝上截肢术对年轻患者可能是一种根治性手段,但对老年患者而言,其效果有限,因为接受外骨骼假体后能独立活动的比例较低。因此,当翻修全膝关节置换术不可行时,使用髓内模块化钉进行关节融合术是一种肢体挽救、减轻疼痛、维持生活质量和日常生活活动能力的选择。在无法进行其他手术的情况下,采用稳定引流系统建立持续性瘘管以及终身抗生素抑制治疗可能是一种选择。然后应进行积极的临床监测。清创、抗生素治疗和保留植入物手术联合局部可降解抗生素可以使用,这是一个令人鼓舞的新选择,但不应进行两次。

结论

虽然晚期假体周围关节感染治疗的金标准仍是假体置换,但在预期寿命缩短、感染多次复发、患者有特殊偏好以及存在不利于宿主的因素等情况下,应考虑挽救性手术。在这些情况下,合适的挽救性手术可暂时使感染缓解,并维持活动能力。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/db39/10316561/681b90fd2198/42836_2023_182_Fig1_HTML.jpg

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验