Suppr超能文献

使用稳定测量法对前交叉韧带重建术后本体感觉的分析:一项前瞻性纵向研究

Proprioception Analysis following Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction using Stabilometry: A Prospective, Longitudinal Study.

作者信息

Al-Dadah Oday, Shepstone Lee, Donell Simon T

机构信息

Instituto de Pesquisa Clinica e Translacional, Faculdade de Ciências Médicas, Universidade de Newcastle, Framlington Place, Newcastle-upon-Tyne, Reino Unido.

Departamento de Trauma e Cirurgia Ortopédica, South Tyneside Hospital, Harton Lane, South Shields, NE34 0PL, Reino Unido.

出版信息

Rev Bras Ortop (Sao Paulo). 2023 Jun 29;58(3):417-427. doi: 10.1055/s-0042-1758360. eCollection 2023 Jun.

Abstract

Commonly used methods for measuring proprioception have resulted in conflicting reports regarding knee proprioception with anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) rupture and the influence of ACL reconstruction.  One hundred subjects (50 patients with radiologically and arthroscopically confirmed unilateral ACL rupture and 50 normal controls) were assessed with regards to proprioception using dynamic single-leg stance postural stabilometry. Instrumented knee ligament laxity and knee outcome scores were also measured. Of the 50 patients in the ACL group, 34 underwent reconstruction and were reassessed postoperatively.  There was a significant proprioceptive deficiency in the ACL group compared with their contralateral knee (  < 0.001) and to the control group (  = 0.01). There was a significant improvement in knee proprioception following ACL reconstruction compared to preoperative findings (  = 0.003). There was no correlation between ligament laxity measurements and outcome scores. A significant correlation was found preoperatively between outcome scores and proprioception measurements. This correlation was not found post-operatively. Pre-operative proprioception testing had a significant correlation (r = 0.46) with post-operative proprioception (  = 0.006).  Patients with an ACL rupture had a proprioceptive deficit which improved following ligament reconstruction. Knee outcome scores had a better correlation with proprioception than ligament laxity. Proprioception may be a superior objective measure than ligament laxity in quantifying functional knee deficits and outcomes in patients with ACL ruptures.

摘要

常用的本体感觉测量方法在关于前交叉韧带(ACL)断裂时的膝关节本体感觉以及ACL重建的影响方面得出了相互矛盾的报告。对100名受试者(50例经放射学和关节镜检查证实为单侧ACL断裂的患者以及50名正常对照者)使用动态单腿站立姿势稳定测量法评估本体感觉。还测量了仪器化的膝关节韧带松弛度和膝关节结果评分。在ACL组的50例患者中,34例接受了重建,并在术后进行了重新评估。与对侧膝关节相比,ACL组存在明显的本体感觉缺陷(<0.001),与对照组相比也存在明显缺陷(=0.01)。与术前结果相比,ACL重建后膝关节本体感觉有显著改善(=0.003)。韧带松弛度测量与结果评分之间没有相关性。术前结果评分与本体感觉测量之间存在显著相关性。术后未发现这种相关性。术前本体感觉测试与术后本体感觉有显著相关性(r = 0.46)(=0.006)。ACL断裂的患者存在本体感觉缺陷,韧带重建后有所改善。膝关节结果评分与本体感觉的相关性比韧带松弛度更好。在量化ACL断裂患者的功能性膝关节缺陷和结果方面,本体感觉可能是比韧带松弛度更优越的客观指标。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/37e9/10310417/fad351b6aae7/10-1055-s-0042-1758360-i2200085en-1.jpg

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验