Floberg J, Belfrage P, Carlsson M, Ohlsen H
Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand. 1986;65(4):321-6. doi: 10.3109/00016348609157352.
A random sample of 798 primiparas was screened with clinical evaluation and radiologic low-dose pelvimetry of the pelvic outlet. The purpose was to study the accuracy of clinical evaluation in comparison with X-ray pelvimetry and to determine whether clinical evaluation could reveal any other factor influencing labor. A significant agreement between clinical and X-ray pelvimetry was found, but the sensitivity of clinical evaluation was low and as many as half the patients with a contracted pelvis, according to pelvimetry, were not detected. Delivery outcomes in two matched groups with similar pelvic outlet measurements but different clinical evaluation did not differ, indicating that clinical evaluation did not detect any other factor not revealed by X-ray pelvimetry.
对798名初产妇进行随机抽样,通过临床评估和骨盆出口低剂量放射学骨盆测量进行筛查。目的是研究临床评估与X线骨盆测量相比的准确性,并确定临床评估是否能揭示影响分娩的任何其他因素。发现临床评估与X线骨盆测量之间存在显著一致性,但临床评估的敏感性较低,根据骨盆测量,多达一半骨盆狭窄的患者未被检测出。两组骨盆出口测量相似但临床评估不同的匹配组的分娩结局并无差异,这表明临床评估未检测出X线骨盆测量未揭示的任何其他因素。