Broussard Alicia L, Leader Benjamin, Tirado Edna, Russell Helena, Beydoun Hind, Colver Robert, Reuter Laura, Bopp Bradford, Will Matthew, Anspach Will Erica, Adaniya Glen
Midwest Fertility Specialists, Carmel, Indiana.
ReproSource, Marlborough, Massachusetts.
F S Rep. 2023 Apr 25;4(2):183-189. doi: 10.1016/j.xfre.2023.04.006. eCollection 2023 Jun.
To determine the effects of sperm deoxyribonucleic acid (DNA) fragmentation at the time of fertilization on in vitro fertilization (IVF) outcomes and genetic diagnosis using next generation sequencing.
Prospective double-blinded study.
Private Clinic.
Couples (n = 150).
In vitro fertilization with preimplantation genetic testing for aneuploidy and sperm DNA fragmentation assay, as in sperm chromatin structure assay the day of retrieval.
Laboratory outcomes are listed in the results section. Statistical analysis was performed using JMP, XYLSTAT, and STATA version 15.
The sperm DNA fragmentation index (DFI) in the neat ejaculate did not predict fertilization rate, quality, blastulation, or genetic diagnosis. No statistically significant results were obtained comparing <15% with >15%, <20% with >20%, <30% with >30% except for DFI. No statistically significant differences in oocyte source age or male age were observed. No statistically significant differences comparing <15% with >15%, <20% with >20%, <30% with >30% DFI at the time of standard IVF or intracytoplasmic sperm injection (ICSI) were observed for % euploid, aneuploid, mosaic, blastulation, biopsied, or D5/total biopsied. The DFI of >15% had more good quality D3 embryos than the <15% group, as did the >20% group compared with the <20% group. The ICSI fertilization was significantly higher in all 3 lower percentage groups compared with the higher counterpart. Standard IVF had significantly more blastocysts/fertilized suitable for biopsy and more D5/total number biopsied than ICSI embryos despite no difference in DFI.
The DFI at fertilization is correlated with decreased fertilization for ICSI and IVF.
确定受精时精子脱氧核糖核酸(DNA)片段化对体外受精(IVF)结局及使用下一代测序进行基因诊断的影响。
前瞻性双盲研究。
私立诊所。
夫妇(n = 150)。
进行体外受精并同时进行非整倍体植入前基因检测及精子DNA片段化检测,如在取精日进行精子染色质结构检测。
实验室结果列于结果部分。使用JMP、XYLSTAT和STATA 15版进行统计分析。
纯精液中的精子DNA片段化指数(DFI)不能预测受精率、质量、囊胚形成或基因诊断。除DFI外,比较<15%与>15%、<20%与>20%、<30%与>30%时未获得统计学显著结果。卵母细胞来源年龄或男性年龄未观察到统计学显著差异。在标准体外受精或卵胞浆内单精子注射(ICSI)时,比较<15%与>15%、<20%与>20%、<30%与>30%的DFI,在整倍体率、非整倍体率、嵌合体率、囊胚形成率、活检率或D5/总活检数方面未观察到统计学显著差异。DFI>15%组的优质D3胚胎比<15%组更多,>20%组比<20%组也是如此。所有3个较低百分比组的ICSI受精率均显著高于较高百分比组。尽管DFI无差异,但标准体外受精比ICSI胚胎有显著更多适合活检的囊胚/受精卵以及更多的D5/活检总数。
受精时的DFI与ICSI和IVF的受精率降低相关。