Suppr超能文献

急性心肌梗死中与入院时间相关的急性干预措施的意义。

Implications for acute intervention related to time of hospital arrival in acute myocardial infarction.

作者信息

Turi Z G, Stone P H, Muller J E, Parker C, Rude R E, Raabe D E, Jaffe A S, Hartwell T D, Robertson T L, Braunwald E

出版信息

Am J Cardiol. 1986 Aug 1;58(3):203-9. doi: 10.1016/0002-9149(86)90047-0.

Abstract

The time from onset of symptoms to arrival in the hospital emergency room (ER) was studied in 778 patients randomized into a study of acute myocardial infarction (AMI) size limitation. Patients at relatively high risk of death after AMI (including those with preexisting diabetes mellitus, systemic hypertension or congestive heart failure), women and older patients arrived significantly later in the ER than did patients without these characteristics. A significantly higher mortality rate was observed in patients who arrived late, i.e., those who arrived more than 2 hours after the onset of chest pain, even though patients with hemodynamic compromise (bradycardia, hypotension) tended to arrive earlier. The difference in long-term mortality between those who arrived early (within 2 hours of onset of chest pain) and those who arrived late was accounted for by the baseline differences between these 2 groups. These baseline differences may influence the effects of early interventions in AMI. In addition, these findings have implications for education of high-risk patients who could benefit the most from aggressive early intervention.

摘要

在一项针对急性心肌梗死(AMI)面积限制的研究中,对778例随机分组的患者进行了研究,记录了从症状发作到抵达医院急诊室(ER)的时间。急性心肌梗死后死亡风险相对较高的患者(包括那些既往患有糖尿病、系统性高血压或充血性心力衰竭的患者)、女性患者和老年患者抵达急诊室的时间明显晚于无这些特征的患者。在胸痛发作后2小时以上才抵达的患者(即迟到患者)中观察到显著更高的死亡率,尽管有血流动力学障碍(心动过缓、低血压)的患者往往抵达较早。胸痛发作后2小时内抵达的患者(即早到患者)与迟到患者之间的长期死亡率差异是由这两组患者的基线差异造成的。这些基线差异可能会影响急性心肌梗死早期干预的效果。此外,这些发现对高危患者的教育具有启示意义,这些患者可能从积极的早期干预中获益最大。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验