Suppr超能文献

收肌管阻滞技术不会导致坐骨神经分支受累:一项放射学尸体研究。

Adductor canal block techniques do not lead to involvement of sciatic nerve branches: a radiological cadaveric study.

机构信息

Department of Anesthesiology, Amsterdam UMC Location AMC, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.

Department of Anesthesiology, Rijnstate Hospital, Arnhem, The Netherlands.

出版信息

Reg Anesth Pain Med. 2024 Mar 4;49(3):174-178. doi: 10.1136/rapm-2022-104227.

Abstract

INTRODUCTION

Low and high volume mid-thigh (ie, distal femoral triangle) and distal adductor canal block approaches are frequently applied for knee surgical procedures. Although these techniques aim to contain the injectate within the adductor canal, spillage into the popliteal fossa has been reported. While in theory this could improve analgesia, it might also result in motor blockade due to coverage of motor branches of the sciatic nerve. This radiological cadaveric study, therefore, investigated the incidence of coverage of sciatic nerve divisions after various adductor canal block techniques.

METHODS

Eighteen fresh, unfrozen and unembalmed human cadavers were randomized to receive ultrasound-guided distal femoral triangle or distal adductor canal injections, with 2 mL or 30 mL injectate volume, on both sides (36 blocks in total). The injectate was a 1:10 dilution of contrast medium in local anesthetic. Injectate spread was assessed using whole-body CT with reconstructions in axial, sagittal and coronal planes.

RESULTS

No coverage of the sciatic nerve or its main divisions was found. The contrast mixture spread to the popliteal fossa in three of 36 nerve blocks. Contrast reached the saphenous nerve after all injections, whereas the femoral nerve was always spared.

CONCLUSIONS

Adductor canal block techniques are unlikely, even when using larger volumes, to block the sciatic nerve, or its main branches. Furthermore, injectate reached the popliteal fossa in a small minority of cases, yet if a clinical analgesic effect is achieved by this mechanism is still unknown.

摘要

引言

低位和高位股中部(即股骨三角区远端)和股收肌管远端阻滞技术常用于膝关节手术。尽管这些技术旨在将注射物限制在收肌管内,但已有报道称注射物会溢出到腘窝。虽然从理论上讲,这可能会改善镇痛效果,但由于坐骨神经运动支被覆盖,也可能导致运动阻滞。因此,这项影像学尸体研究调查了各种股收肌管阻滞技术后坐骨神经分支被覆盖的发生率。

方法

18 具新鲜、未冷冻、未经防腐处理的人体尸体随机接受超声引导下的股三角区或股收肌管注射,每侧注射 2mL 或 30mL 等渗盐水(共 36 个阻滞)。注射用局部麻醉剂中含 1:10 稀释的造影剂。使用全身 CT 进行评估,在轴位、矢状位和冠状位重建图像。

结果

未发现坐骨神经或其主要分支被覆盖。36 个神经阻滞中有 3 个在股中部阻滞中发现造影剂扩散到腘窝。所有注射后均可见造影剂到达隐神经,但股神经始终未被累及。

结论

即使使用较大的容量,股收肌管阻滞技术也不太可能阻滞坐骨神经或其主要分支。此外,在少数情况下,注射物会到达腘窝,但如果这种机制能达到临床镇痛效果仍不得而知。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验