Han Zhengyi, Zhang Yangyang, Xue Chenxi, Jin Shiyun, Chen Qi, Zhang Ye
Department of Anesthesiology, The Second Affiliated Hospital of Anhui Medical University, Hefei, 230601, People's Republic of China.
Key Laboratory of Anesthesiology and Perioperative Medicine of Anhui Higher Education Institutes, Anhui Medical University, Hefei, 230601, People's Republic of China.
J Pain Res. 2024 Jul 11;17:2375-2391. doi: 10.2147/JPR.S463097. eCollection 2024.
Total Knee Arthroplasty (TKA) is a highly invasive procedure causing severe postoperative pain, which hampers early mobility. Effective pain management is crucial for optimal recovery. This study aimed to evaluate how adductor canal block (ACB) and femoral nerve block (FNB) affect opioid use and inflammation factor levels in elderly TKA patients.
This prospective observational study included 120 patients who received TKA, and divided them into three groups, based on the different nerve block technique: ACB, FNB, and no intervention before general anesthesia (CON). Postoperative opioid consumption, pain assessment, inflammation factor, knee function recovery and other clinical indicators were recorded.
The CON group had significantly higher cumulative sufentanil consumption compared to the ACB and FNB groups at both 12 h and 48h postoperative (<0.001). Compared with the CON group, the ACB and FNB groups persistently had lower pain scores until 12 h at rest and 24 h during motion after surgery. The ACB group showed significantly lower serum concentrations of C-reactive protein (CRP) and interleukin-6 (IL-6) compared to the CON group at 24 h postoperative (=0.017, =0.009), and IL-6 levels remained significantly lower at 72 h postoperative (=0.005). Both ACB and FNB groups achieved earlier ambulation compared to the CON group (=0.002). On the first day postoperative, both the ACB and FNB groups showed significantly better knee motion (<0.001), quadriceps strength (<0.001), and daily mobilization (<0.001) compared to the CON group. Additionally, the ACB group exhibited superior quadriceps strength (<0.001) and daily mobilization (<0.001) compared to the FNB group.
The ACB and FNB groups exhibited comparable clinical efficacy outcomes in terms of pain scores and opioid consumption. However, the ACB group experienced reduced postoperative inflammation and improved knee recovery, especially in quadriceps strength.
全膝关节置换术(TKA)是一种侵入性很强的手术,会导致严重的术后疼痛,从而妨碍早期活动。有效的疼痛管理对于最佳恢复至关重要。本研究旨在评估内收肌管阻滞(ACB)和股神经阻滞(FNB)对老年TKA患者阿片类药物使用和炎症因子水平的影响。
这项前瞻性观察性研究纳入了120例行TKA的患者,并根据不同的神经阻滞技术将他们分为三组:ACB组、FNB组和全身麻醉前不进行干预的对照组(CON)。记录术后阿片类药物的消耗量、疼痛评估、炎症因子、膝关节功能恢复情况及其他临床指标。
术后12小时和48小时,CON组的舒芬太尼累计消耗量均显著高于ACB组和FNB组(<0.001)。与CON组相比,ACB组和FNB组在术后休息12小时和活动24小时期间的疼痛评分持续较低。术后24小时,ACB组的血清C反应蛋白(CRP)和白细胞介素-6(IL-6)浓度显著低于CON组(分别为=0.017,=0.009),术后72小时IL-6水平仍显著较低(=0.005)。与CON组相比,ACB组和FNB组的行走时间更早(=0.002)。术后第一天,ACB组和FNB组的膝关节活动度(<0.001)、股四头肌力量(<0.001)和每日活动量(<0.001)均显著优于CON组。此外,与FNB组相比,ACB组的股四头肌力量(<0.001)和每日活动量(<0.001)更优。
ACB组和FNB组在疼痛评分和阿片类药物消耗方面表现出相当的临床疗效。然而,ACB组术后炎症减轻,膝关节恢复改善,尤其是股四头肌力量。