Faculty of Medicine, University of Malaya, Malaysia.
School of Medicine, Imperial College London, England.
Otol Neurotol. 2023 Aug 1;44(7):643-650. doi: 10.1097/MAO.0000000000003940. Epub 2023 Jun 29.
To compare postoperative tympanoplasty outcomes between active versus inactive otitis media (OM) patients with tympanic membrane perforation.
Medline via PubMed, Embase, Web of Science, Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials, and Google Scholar for studies published from inception to March 1, 2023.
Studies of 15- to 60-year-old patients undergoing microscopic/endoscopic myringoplasty using underlay/overlay technique with reported postoperative mean hearing gain and graft uptake were included. Studies requiring simultaneous surgical procedures, reporting patients with comorbidities and with non-English full text articles were excluded. Articles were independently screened by two researchers with data extracted according to a predetermined proforma in Microsoft Excel. Cochrane risk-of-bias assessment was used for risk of bias evaluation of randomized studies and Risk of Bias in Nonrandomized Studies of Interventions for nonrandomized studies. Similar studies were pooled for meta-analysis using the inverse variance random effects model to calculate the mean difference and corresponding 95% confidence interval (CI) for mean hearing gain and DerSimonian and Laird random effects model for graft uptake.
Thirty-three studies comprising 2,373 patients met the inclusion/exclusion criteria, seven were pooled for meta-analysis. Included articles showed inactive OM patients have higher average postoperative mean hearing gain of 10.84 dB and graft uptake of 88.7% compared to active OM patients (9.15 dB and 84.2%). Meta-analysis of mean hearing gain (MD, -0.76 dB; 95% CI, -2.11 to 0.60; p = 0.27, moderate certainty) and graft uptake (OD, 0.61; 95% CI, 0.34-1.09; p = 0.10, moderate certainty) have an overall p value >0.05.
There were no statistically significant differences in postoperative mean hearing gain and graft uptake between active and inactive OM patients undergoing tympanoplasty. Hence, tympanoplasty procedures should not be postponed solely because of patients' preoperative ear discharge status.
比较鼓膜穿孔患者中活动性与非活动性中耳炎(OM)患者的鼓室成形术术后结果。
通过 PubMed、Embase、Web of Science、Cochrane 对照试验中心注册库和 Google Scholar 检索从建库至 2023 年 3 月 1 日发表的研究。
纳入研究对象为年龄 15 岁至 60 岁,接受显微镜/内镜鼓膜成形术,使用底层/覆盖层技术,报告术后平均听力增益和移植物吸收率的研究。排除需要同时进行手术的研究、报告有合并症的患者和非英文全文文章的研究。文章由两名研究人员独立筛选,根据 Microsoft Excel 中的预定方案提取数据。采用 Cochrane 偏倚风险评估对随机研究进行偏倚风险评估,对非随机干预研究的偏倚风险评估采用非随机研究的偏倚风险评估。采用逆方差随机效应模型对相似的研究进行荟萃分析,计算平均听力增益的均数差值和相应的 95%置信区间(CI),采用 DerSimonian 和 Laird 随机效应模型计算移植物吸收率。
33 项研究纳入 2373 例患者,符合纳入/排除标准,7 项研究纳入荟萃分析。纳入的文章显示,与活动性 OM 患者相比,非活动性 OM 患者术后平均听力增益较高,为 10.84 dB,移植物吸收率为 88.7%(9.15 dB 和 84.2%)。平均听力增益的荟萃分析(MD,-0.76 dB;95%CI,-2.11 至 0.60;p = 0.27,中等确定性)和移植物吸收率的荟萃分析(OD,0.61;95%CI,0.34-1.09;p = 0.10,中等确定性)的总体 p 值均大于 0.05。
在接受鼓室成形术的活动性和非活动性 OM 患者中,术后平均听力增益和移植物吸收率无统计学差异。因此,不应仅因为患者术前耳部溢液状况而推迟鼓室成形术。