Department of Surgery, Cedars-Sinai Medical Center, Los Angeles, CA, USA.
Comprehensive Transplant Center, Cedars-Sinai Medical Center, Los Angeles, CA, USA.
Ann Transplant. 2023 Jul 4;28:e940255. doi: 10.12659/AOT.940255.
BACKGROUND The present study evaluated expanded cause of death (COD) definitions and its implications on donor utilization for solid organ transplantation. MATERIAL AND METHODS The OPTN Standard Transplant and Research file was queried for potential donors between 2005 and 2019. Donor- and organ-specific utilization were evaluated. Expanded donor COD were identified: trauma, cardiovascular (CV), cerebrovascular accident (CVA) or stroke, drug intoxication (DI), anoxia not otherwise specified (NOS), and other. Descriptive analyses and multivariable logistic regression analyses for donor utilization were performed. RESULTS Among 132 783 potential donors identified, the most common COD was CVA/Stroke (n=44 707, 33.7%), followed by trauma (n=43 356, 32.7%), CV (n=20 053, 15.1%), anoxia-NOS (n=12 261, 9.2%), DI (n=10 205, 7.7%), and other causes (n=2201, 1.7%). Significant differences between CV, DI, and anoxia-NOS groups existed for donor age, sex, ethnicity, body mass index, and comorbidities. Donors from trauma had the highest unadjusted utilization rate (97.2%) while CV donors had the lowest (90.1%). Multivariable analysis of brain-dead donors (DBD) showed that compared to trauma, donors from DI had higher likelihood of utilization (odds ratio 1.217, 95% 1.025-1.446) while CV donors were lower (OR 0.717, 95% CI 0.642-0.800, P<0.001). Among donation after circulatory death (DCD) donors, there was decreased utilization compared to trauma for both CV (OR 0.607, 95% CI 0.523-0.705) and DI (OR 0.754, 95% CI 0.603-0.914, P<0.001). CONCLUSIONS Current COD definitions should be expanded to capture significant differences in the donor population. DI donors are the fastest growing cohort and the most likely utilized DBD donors, while trauma donors remain the most likely utilized DCD donors.
本研究评估了扩展的死亡原因(COD)定义及其对实体器官移植供体利用的影响。
查询 2005 年至 2019 年期间的潜在供体的 OPTN 标准移植和研究文件。评估供体和器官特异性利用情况。确定了扩展的供体 COD:创伤、心血管(CV)、脑血管意外(CVA)或中风、药物中毒(DI)、非特指性缺氧(NOS)和其他。进行了供体利用的描述性分析和多变量逻辑回归分析。
在确定的 132783 名潜在供体中,最常见的 COD 是 CVA/中风(n=44707,33.7%),其次是创伤(n=43356,32.7%)、CV(n=20053,15.1%)、NOS 缺氧(n=12261,9.2%)、DI(n=10205,7.7%)和其他原因(n=2201,1.7%)。CV、DI 和 NOS 组之间在供体年龄、性别、种族、体重指数和合并症方面存在显著差异。创伤供体的未调整利用率最高(97.2%),而 CV 供体的利用率最低(90.1%)。脑死亡供体(DBD)的多变量分析显示,与创伤相比,DI 供体的利用可能性更高(比值比 1.217,95%置信区间 1.025-1.446),而 CV 供体则更低(OR 0.717,95%CI 0.642-0.800,P<0.001)。在循环死亡后捐赠(DCD)供体中,与创伤相比,CV(OR 0.607,95%CI 0.523-0.705)和 DI(OR 0.754,95%CI 0.603-0.914,P<0.001)的利用率均降低。
目前的 COD 定义应扩大以捕捉供体人群中的显著差异。DI 供体是增长最快的群体,也是最有可能利用的 DBD 供体,而创伤供体仍然是最有可能利用的 DCD 供体。