Department of Pharmacy, Cancer Hospital of Shantou University Medical College, Shantou, 515041, China.
Department of Pharmacy, Fujian Medical University Union Hospital, Fuzhou, 350001, China.
Immunotherapy. 2023 Sep;15(13):1045-1055. doi: 10.2217/imt-2023-0059. Epub 2023 Jul 4.
To evaluate the cost-effectiveness of serplulimab as first-line treatment for patients with advanced esophageal squamous cell carcinoma from the perspective of the Chinese healthcare system. A partitioned survival model was created to evaluate costs and health outcomes. The model's robustness was evaluated using one-way and probabilistic sensitivity analyses. Serplulimab demonstrated an incremental cost-effectiveness ratio of $104,537.375/quality-adjusted life-year in the overall population group. Subgroup analysis showed that serplulimab had incremental cost-effectiveness ratios of $261,750.496/quality-adjusted life-year and $68,107.997/quality-adjusted life-year in the populations with PD-L1 1 ≤ combined positive score <10 and PD-L1 combined positive score ≥10, respectively. Incremental cost-effectiveness ratios of serplulimab therapy were found to exceed the willingness-to-pay threshold of $37,304.34. Thus, serplulimab is not cost-effective compared with chemotherapy as a first-line treatment for esophageal squamous cell carcinoma patients.
从中国医疗体系的角度评估赛普利单抗作为晚期食管鳞癌一线治疗的成本效益。采用分割生存模型评估成本和健康结果。使用单因素敏感性分析和概率敏感性分析评估模型的稳健性。赛普利单抗在总体人群中的增量成本-效果比为 104537.375 美元/质量调整生命年。亚组分析显示,赛普利单抗在 PD-L1 1≤联合阳性评分<10 和 PD-L1 联合阳性评分≥10 的人群中的增量成本-效果比分别为 2617504.96 美元/质量调整生命年和 68107997 美元/质量调整生命年。赛普利单抗治疗的增量成本-效果比超过了 37304.34 美元的意愿支付阈值。因此,与化疗相比,赛普利单抗作为一线治疗食管鳞癌患者并不具有成本效益。