• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

生物制剂初治克罗恩病患者中英夫利昔单抗与阿达木单抗的比较:单中心 13 年经验。

Comparison of infliximab with adalimumab in biologic-naïve patients with Crohn's disease: a single-center 13-year experience.

机构信息

Department of Gastroenterology, Ankara City Hospital, Ankara, Turkey.

出版信息

Eur Rev Med Pharmacol Sci. 2023 Jun;27(12):5757-5766. doi: 10.26355/eurrev_202306_32814.

DOI:10.26355/eurrev_202306_32814
PMID:37401312
Abstract

OBJECTIVE

Long-term comparison studies between infliximab (IFX) and adalimumab (ADA) with or without immunomodulator therapy are still needed in Crohn's disease (CD). In this study, we evaluated IFX and ADA for long-term clinical effectiveness and safety in CD patients who had not previously received a biologic treatment.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

The data of adult CD patients were collected retrospectively between December 2007 and February 2021. We compared CD-related hospitalization, CD-related abdominal surgery, steroid use, and serious infections.

RESULTS

Out of 224 CD patients, 101 started IFX first (median age: 38.12 years, 61.4% male), while 123 started ADA first (median age: 30.2 years, 64.2% male). The disease durations were 7.01 years and 6.91 years for IFX and ADA, respectively. There were no significant differences between the two groups with respect to age, gender, smoking, immunomodulator usage, and disease activity score at the onset of anti-TNF therapy (p>0.05). Overall, the median follow-up time was 2.36 and 1.86 years after starting anti-tumor necrosis factor-alpha (anti-TNF) therapy in the IFX and ADA groups, respectively. Steroid use (4.0% vs. 10.6%, p=0.109), hospitalization for CD (13.9% vs. 22.8%, p=0.127), abdominal surgery for CD (9.9% vs. 13.0%, p=0.608), and major infections (1.0% vs. 0.8%, p>0.999) did not differ significantly from one another. There were also no significant differences in the rates of these outcomes between concomitant immunomodulator therapy and monotherapy (p>0.05).

CONCLUSIONS

In this study, we observed no significant differences in the long-term effectiveness and safety of IFX and ADA in biologic-naïve patients with CD.

摘要

目的

在克罗恩病(CD)患者中,仍需要进行英夫利昔单抗(IFX)和阿达木单抗(ADA)与或不与免疫调节剂治疗的长期比较研究。在这项研究中,我们评估了未曾接受过生物治疗的 CD 患者中 IFX 和 ADA 的长期临床疗效和安全性。

方法

回顾性收集 2007 年 12 月至 2021 年 2 月期间成年 CD 患者的数据。我们比较了 CD 相关住院、CD 相关腹部手术、类固醇使用和严重感染情况。

结果

在 224 例 CD 患者中,101 例首先开始使用 IFX(中位年龄:38.12 岁,61.4%为男性),而 123 例首先开始使用 ADA(中位年龄:30.2 岁,64.2%为男性)。IFX 和 ADA 的疾病持续时间分别为 7.01 年和 6.91 年。两组在年龄、性别、吸烟、免疫调节剂使用和抗 TNF 治疗起始时疾病活动评分方面无显著差异(p>0.05)。总体而言,IFX 和 ADA 组在开始抗 TNF-α(anti-TNF)治疗后的中位随访时间分别为 2.36 年和 1.86 年。类固醇使用率(4.0%比 10.6%,p=0.109)、CD 相关住院率(13.9%比 22.8%,p=0.127)、CD 相关腹部手术率(9.9%比 13.0%,p=0.608)和重大感染率(1.0%比 0.8%,p>0.999)无显著差异。同时接受免疫调节剂治疗和单药治疗的患者在这些结局的发生率方面也无显著差异(p>0.05)。

结论

在这项研究中,我们观察到生物初治 CD 患者中 IFX 和 ADA 的长期疗效和安全性无显著差异。

相似文献

1
Comparison of infliximab with adalimumab in biologic-naïve patients with Crohn's disease: a single-center 13-year experience.生物制剂初治克罗恩病患者中英夫利昔单抗与阿达木单抗的比较:单中心 13 年经验。
Eur Rev Med Pharmacol Sci. 2023 Jun;27(12):5757-5766. doi: 10.26355/eurrev_202306_32814.
2
Long-term outcomes of patients with Crohn's disease who received infliximab or adalimumab as the first-line biologics.接受英夫利昔单抗或阿达木单抗作为一线生物制剂的克罗恩病患者的长期结局。
J Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2019 Aug;34(8):1329-1336. doi: 10.1111/jgh.14624. Epub 2019 Feb 27.
3
Adalimumab or infliximab as monotherapy, or in combination with an immunomodulator, in the treatment of Crohn's disease.阿达木单抗或英夫利昔单抗单药治疗,或与免疫调节剂联合治疗,用于治疗克罗恩病。
Aliment Pharmacol Ther. 2016 Nov;44(10):1102-1113. doi: 10.1111/apt.13808. Epub 2016 Sep 26.
4
Comparative Effectiveness of Infliximab Versus Adalimumab in Patients with Biologic-Naïve Crohn's Disease.生物制剂初治克罗恩病患者中英夫利昔单抗与阿达木单抗的疗效比较。
Dig Dis Sci. 2018 May;63(5):1302-1310. doi: 10.1007/s10620-017-4874-6. Epub 2017 Dec 14.
5
Comparative real-world outcomes between ustekinumab, infliximab, and adalimumab in bio-naïve and bio-experienced Crohn's disease patients: a retrospective multicenter study.在生物初治和生物经验丰富的克罗恩病患者中,乌司奴单抗、英夫利昔单抗和阿达木单抗的真实世界疗效比较:一项回顾性多中心研究。
BMC Gastroenterol. 2024 Sep 11;24(1):306. doi: 10.1186/s12876-024-03403-8.
6
Comparison of Long-term Outcomes of Infliximab versus Adalimumab in 1,488 Biologic-Naive Korean Patients with Crohn's Disease.比较英夫利昔单抗与阿达木单抗在 1488 例生物初治克罗恩病韩国患者中的长期疗效。
Gut Liver. 2021 Jan 15;15(1):92-99. doi: 10.5009/gnl19377.
7
Adalimumab and infliximab are equally effective for Crohn's disease in patients not previously treated with anti-tumor necrosis factor-α agents.阿达木单抗和英夫利昔单抗对于既往未使用过抗 TNF-α 药物的克罗恩病患者同样有效。
Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2013 Jul;11(7):826-31. doi: 10.1016/j.cgh.2013.01.012. Epub 2013 Jan 29.
8
Superior Efficacy of Infliximab Versus Adalimumab for First-Line Treatment of Crohn's Perianal Fistulae.英夫利昔单抗对比阿达木单抗一线治疗克罗恩病肛周瘘的疗效优势。
Dig Dis Sci. 2023 Oct;68(10):3994-4000. doi: 10.1007/s10620-023-08060-7. Epub 2023 Aug 4.
9
Comparison of infliximab with adalimumab in 827 biologic-naïve patients with Crohn's disease: a population-based Danish cohort study.比较英夫利昔单抗与阿达木单抗在 827 例克罗恩病生物初治患者中的疗效:一项基于人群的丹麦队列研究。
Aliment Pharmacol Ther. 2018 Mar;47(5):596-604. doi: 10.1111/apt.14466. Epub 2017 Dec 14.
10
A Propensity Score-matched Comparison of Infliximab and Adalimumab in Tumour Necrosis Factor-α Inhibitor-naïve and Non-naïve Patients With Crohn's Disease: Real-Life Data From the Sicilian Network for Inflammatory Bowel Disease.在肿瘤坏死因子-α抑制剂初治和未初治的克罗恩病患者中,英夫利昔单抗和阿达木单抗的倾向评分匹配比较:来自西西里炎症性肠病网络的真实数据。
J Crohns Colitis. 2019 Feb 1;13(2):209-217. doi: 10.1093/ecco-jcc/jjy156.