Stanhope C R, Symmonds R E, Lee R A, Williams T J, Podratz K C, O'Brien P C
Am J Obstet Gynecol. 1986 Aug;155(2):288-92. doi: 10.1016/0002-9378(86)90811-2.
Two hundred eighteen patients underwent urinary diversion: 156 with ileal and 62 with sigmoid conduits. There were no significant differences between the two groups regarding frequency of conduit morbidity or patient survival. The ileal conduit is preferred for urinary diversion with anterior exenteration, whereas the sigmoid conduit is preferable for urinary diversion with total exenteration.
218例患者接受了尿流改道术:156例采用回肠通道,62例采用乙状结肠通道。两组在通道并发症发生率或患者生存率方面无显著差异。回肠通道更适合于前盆腔脏器清除术后的尿流改道,而乙状结肠通道更适合于全盆腔脏器清除术后的尿流改道。