Wisnoski Nathan I, Andrade Riley, Castorani Max C N, Catano Christopher P, Compagnoni Aldo, Lamy Thomas, Lany Nina K, Marazzi Luca, Record Sydne, Smith Annie C, Swan Christopher M, Tonkin Jonathan D, Voelker Nicole M, Zarnetske Phoebe L, Sokol Eric R
Department of Biological Sciences, Mississippi State University, Mississippi State, Mississippi, USA.
Wyoming Geographic Information Science Center, University of Wyoming, Laramie, Wyoming, USA.
Ecology. 2023 Sep;104(9):e4136. doi: 10.1002/ecy.4136. Epub 2023 Jul 17.
The relationship between biodiversity and stability, or its inverse, temporal variability, is multidimensional and complex. Temporal variability in aggregate properties, like total biomass or abundance, is typically lower in communities with higher species diversity (i.e., the diversity-stability relationship [DSR]). At broader spatial extents, regional-scale aggregate variability is also lower with higher regional diversity (in plant systems) and with lower spatial synchrony. However, focusing exclusively on aggregate properties of communities may overlook potentially destabilizing compositional shifts. It is not yet clear how diversity is related to different components of variability across spatial scales, nor whether regional DSRs emerge across a broad range of organisms and ecosystem types. To test these questions, we compiled a large collection of long-term metacommunity data spanning a wide range of taxonomic groups (e.g., birds, fish, plants, invertebrates) and ecosystem types (e.g., deserts, forests, oceans). We applied a newly developed quantitative framework for jointly analyzing aggregate and compositional variability across scales. We quantified DSRs for composition and aggregate variability in local communities and metacommunities. At the local scale, more diverse communities were less variable, but this effect was stronger for aggregate than compositional properties. We found no stabilizing effect of γ-diversity on metacommunity variability, but β-diversity played a strong role in reducing compositional spatial synchrony, which reduced regional variability. Spatial synchrony differed among taxa, suggesting differences in stabilization by spatial processes. However, metacommunity variability was more strongly driven by local variability than by spatial synchrony. Across a broader range of taxa, our results suggest that high γ-diversity does not consistently stabilize aggregate properties at regional scales without sufficient spatial β-diversity to reduce spatial synchrony.
生物多样性与稳定性之间的关系,或者其相反面——时间变异性,是多维度且复杂的。在物种多样性较高的群落中,诸如总生物量或丰度等总体属性的时间变异性通常较低(即多样性 - 稳定性关系[DSR])。在更广阔的空间范围上,随着区域多样性的增加(在植物系统中)以及空间同步性的降低,区域尺度的总体变异性也较低。然而,仅关注群落的总体属性可能会忽略潜在的不稳定组成变化。目前尚不清楚多样性如何与跨空间尺度的变异性的不同组成部分相关,也不清楚区域DSR是否在广泛的生物体和生态系统类型中出现。为了检验这些问题,我们汇编了大量涵盖广泛分类群(如鸟类、鱼类、植物、无脊椎动物)和生态系统类型(如沙漠、森林、海洋)的长期集合群落数据。我们应用了一个新开发的定量框架来联合分析跨尺度的总体和组成变异性。我们量化了局部群落和集合群落中组成和总体变异性的DSR。在局部尺度上,更多样化的群落变异性较小,但这种效应在总体属性上比在组成属性上更强。我们发现γ - 多样性对集合群落变异性没有稳定作用,但β - 多样性在减少组成空间同步性方面发挥了重要作用,从而降低了区域变异性。空间同步性在不同分类群之间存在差异,表明空间过程在稳定作用方面存在差异。然而,集合群落变异性受局部变异性的驱动比受空间同步性的驱动更强。在更广泛的分类群范围内,我们的结果表明,在没有足够的空间β - 多样性来减少空间同步性的情况下,高γ - 多样性并不能在区域尺度上始终稳定总体属性。