• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

运用分布式认知理论重新构建团队诊断中的情境特殊性。

Reframing context specificity in team diagnosis using the theory of distributed cognition.

机构信息

Undergraduate Medical School, School of Medicine, Dentistry and Nursing, University of Glasgow, Glasgow, UK.

School of Medicine, Dentistry and Nursing, University of Glasgow, Glasgow, UK.

出版信息

Diagnosis (Berl). 2023 Jul 4;10(3):235-241. doi: 10.1515/dx-2022-0100. eCollection 2023 Aug 1.

DOI:10.1515/dx-2022-0100
PMID:37401783
Abstract

Context specificity refers to the vexing phenomenon whereby a physician can see two patients with the same presenting complaint, identical history and physical examination findings, but due to specific situational (contextual) factors arrives at two different diagnostic labels. Context specificity remains incompletely understood and undoubtedly leads to unwanted variance in diagnostic outcomes. Previous empirical work has demonstrated that a variety of contextual factors impacts clinical reasoning. These findings, however, have largely focused on the individual clinician; here we broaden this work to reframe context specificity in relation to clinical reasoning by an internal medicine rounding team through the lens of Distributed Cognition (DCog). In this model, we see how meaning is distributed amongst the different members of a rounding team in a dynamic fashion that evolves over time. We describe four different ways in which context specificity plays out differently in team-based clinical care than for a single clinician. While we use examples from internal medicine, we believe that the concepts we present apply equally to other specialties and fields in health care.

摘要

语境特异性是指一种令人困扰的现象,即医生可以看到两个具有相同主诉、相同病史和体检结果的患者,但由于特定的情境(语境)因素,却得出了两个不同的诊断标签。语境特异性仍然未被完全理解,无疑会导致诊断结果出现不必要的差异。先前的实证研究表明,各种情境因素会影响临床推理。然而,这些发现主要集中在个体医生身上;在这里,我们通过分布式认知(DCog)的视角,将这项工作扩展到内科查房团队的临床推理中,重新定义语境特异性。在这个模型中,我们可以看到在一个动态的过程中,意义是如何在查房团队的不同成员之间分配的,并且这种分配会随着时间的推移而演变。我们描述了在以团队为基础的医疗护理中,语境特异性与单个医生的情况相比,表现出的四种不同方式。虽然我们使用了内科的例子,但我们相信,我们提出的概念同样适用于医疗保健的其他专业和领域。

相似文献

1
Reframing context specificity in team diagnosis using the theory of distributed cognition.运用分布式认知理论重新构建团队诊断中的情境特殊性。
Diagnosis (Berl). 2023 Jul 4;10(3):235-241. doi: 10.1515/dx-2022-0100. eCollection 2023 Aug 1.
2
Situativity: a family of social cognitive theories for understanding clinical reasoning and diagnostic error.情境性:用于理解临床推理和诊断错误的一系列社会认知理论。
Diagnosis (Berl). 2020 Aug 27;7(3):169-176. doi: 10.1515/dx-2019-0100.
3
Widening the lens on teaching and assessing clinical reasoning: from "in the head" to "out in the world".拓宽教学和评估临床推理的视角:从“头脑中”到“现实世界中”。
Diagnosis (Berl). 2020 Aug 27;7(3):181-190. doi: 10.1515/dx-2019-0098.
4
Understanding context specificity: the effect of contextual factors on clinical reasoning.理解语境特异性:语境因素对临床推理的影响。
Diagnosis (Berl). 2020 Aug 27;7(3):257-264. doi: 10.1515/dx-2020-0016.
5
Contextual factors and clinical reasoning: differences in diagnostic and therapeutic reasoning in board certified versus resident physicians.情境因素与临床推理:获得委员会认证的医生与住院医师在诊断和治疗推理方面的差异。
BMC Med Educ. 2017 Nov 15;17(1):211. doi: 10.1186/s12909-017-1041-x.
6
Consequences of contextual factors on clinical reasoning in resident physicians.情境因素对住院医师临床推理的影响
Adv Health Sci Educ Theory Pract. 2015 Dec;20(5):1225-36. doi: 10.1007/s10459-015-9597-x. Epub 2015 Mar 10.
7
Distributed cognition: Theoretical insights and practical applications to health professions education: AMEE Guide No. 159.分布式认知:对健康专业教育的理论洞察和实际应用:AMEE 指南第 159 号。
Med Teach. 2023 Dec;45(12):1323-1333. doi: 10.1080/0142159X.2023.2190479. Epub 2023 Apr 12.
8
Sharing the Bandwidth in Cognitively Overloaded Teams and Systems: Mechanistic Insights from a Walk on the Wild Side of Clinical Reasoning.认知过载团队和系统中的带宽共享:临床推理狂野一面的机制洞察
Teach Learn Med. 2022 Apr-May;34(2):215-222. doi: 10.1080/10401334.2021.1924723. Epub 2021 Jun 24.
9
Sequence matters: patterns in task-based clinical reasoning.序列很重要:基于任务的临床推理模式。
Diagnosis (Berl). 2020 Aug 27;7(3):281-289. doi: 10.1515/dx-2019-0095.
10
The impact of selected contextual factors on experts' clinical reasoning performance (does context impact clinical reasoning performance in experts?).所选情境因素对专家临床推理表现的影响(情境是否会影响专家的临床推理表现?)
Adv Health Sci Educ Theory Pract. 2012 Mar;17(1):65-79. doi: 10.1007/s10459-011-9294-3. Epub 2011 Apr 20.

引用本文的文献

1
The logic of medical reasoning: toward an integrated inductive, deductive, and abductive approach to clinical practices.医学推理的逻辑:迈向临床实践中归纳、演绎和溯因相结合的方法。
Philos Ethics Humanit Med. 2025 Sep 17;20(1):16. doi: 10.1186/s13010-025-00178-y.
2
On context specificity and management reasoning: moving beyond diagnosis.论情境特异性与管理推理:超越诊断
Diagnosis (Berl). 2025 Jan 8;12(2):217-222. doi: 10.1515/dx-2024-0122. eCollection 2025 May 1.
3
Bringing team science to the ambulatory diagnostic process: how do patients and clinicians develop shared mental models?
将团队科学引入门诊诊断过程:患者和临床医生如何形成共享心智模型?
Diagnosis (Berl). 2024 Oct 21;12(1):25-34. doi: 10.1515/dx-2024-0115. eCollection 2025 Feb 1.